Skip to content
Millennium Relief and Development Services Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Millennium Relief and Development Services Inc

To provide relief and development assistance in difficult and often hostile parts of the world

$316k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$982kFood & Nutrition$98kArts & Culture$75kReligion$31k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $98,762, the rows itemized in this filing. The $316,011 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $217,249 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$27,100
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc$33,112
Frontiers USA$27,100
International Mission Board$20,800
Literacy Initiatives$17,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MIO Frontiers: $26k → 11%International Sharif Bible Society: $75k → 12%LINACRE INC: $40k → 9%Linacre Inc: $45k → 16%Hope Over Crisis Inc: $20k → 13%Global Serve International Inc: $6k → 11%Kolo Group Inc: $11k → 13%Literacy Initiatives: $28k → 8%Agricultural Development Initiatives Inc: $20k → 14%DESTA: $8k → 8%International Mission Board: $21k → 9%Restoration Farm Ministries: $6k → 21%MIO Frontiers: $26k → 11%The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston: $48k → 16%Kolo Group Inc: $7k → 13%Literacy Initiatives: $25k → 8%Intl Mission Board Southern Baptist Conv: $8k → 9%Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc: $53k → 16%Kolo Group Inc: $6k → 13%Literacy Initiatives: $25k → 8%Small Places: $40k → 16%Literacy Initiatives: $20k → 8%Small Places: $38k → 16%Literacy Initiatives: $18k → 8%Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc: $254k → 16%Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc: $121k → 16%Axia International: $39k → 16%Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc: $33k → 16%Axia International: $8k → 16%Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc: $11k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OR
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
SC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $163k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$158k · 97% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Relief & Development

Sub-Saharan Africa$5k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Relief & Development

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$865k · 8 repeat orgs$321k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$865k
$321k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
0%

Still filing today

63%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $351k · revenue +64%
  • LI
    LINACRE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $85k · revenue +21%
  • SP
    Small Places
    2× · 2021–2022 · $78k · revenue +916%

Funded once

  • MR
    MILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $121k · revenue -8%
  • IS
    International Sharif Bible Society
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -58% · 32% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON
    one grant, 2022 · $48k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Harvest International Min

To provide strategic teaching about prayer, prophecy, and intercession in the US and abroad. Books, manuals, and audio teachings are also used to equip Christians in strategic level spiritual prayer and warfare.

Religion
2
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
3
Frontier Alliance International Inc

FAI is a disciple making ministry trying to reach the least reached peoples with the Gospel of Jesus Christ and mercy ministries.

Religion
4
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

—
5
Global Impact Resources Inc

Global Impact Resources partners with Christian missionaries around the world, providing spiritual support and practical administration to make the fundraising side of ministry an easier process.The organization provides credibility,…

International
6
Discipleship Global Inc

Our vision is to catalyze a Disciple Making Movement that will bless every church and every People, teaching others who will impact others for time and eternity.

—
7
Crossway International Inc

CrossWay International is committed to spreading the clear Gospel message of Gods grace throughout the world.

Religion
8
Partners in Development Worldwide

Train ministers, lay people and students who are involved at any level of ministry in small or large churches at local, national, and international levels. We train to go into the world and spread the gospel by helping people meet their…

International
9
Greater Reach Inc

To present the gospel of Jesus Christ to unreached people groups. Equipping pastors and leaders in foreign lands to promote the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Religion
10
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
11
Restoration Bridge International Inc

Restoration Bridge International endeavors to help supply people in need with food until they no longer need assistance.

Human Services
12
Kingdom Investment International Inc

Kingdom Investment works among the poor and oppressed to bear witness to the good news of the Kingdom of God that results in holistic transformation through the power of the Holy Spirit.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Serve International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Restoration Farm Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $351,037 · InternationalALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INCMILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC: $120,686 · InternationalMILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INCLINACRE INC: $85,000 · InternationalLINACRE INCMIO Frontiers: $134,823 · ReligionMIO FrontiersKOLO GROUP: $24,134 · ReligionKOLO GROUPGOD'S ECONOMY INC: $7,032 · ReligionRestoration Farm Ministries: $6,485 · Religion+1 more: $5,552 · ReligionLITERACY INITIATIVES: $115,965 · EducationLITERACY IN…UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON: $47,763 · OtherUNIVERSITY O…INTERNATIONAL MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION: $29,200 · OtherINTERNATIONA…OIKOS INTERNATIONAL: $10,443 · OtherOIKOS INTERN…AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES: $20,000 · OtherAGRICULTURAL…Hope Over Crisis Inc: $19,608 · OtherHope Over Cr…DESTA: $8,000 · OtherDESTASmall Places: $78,372 · Food & NutritionInternational Sharif Bible Society: $75,000 · Arts & CultureAxia International: $46,789 · Philanthropy
International$556,723Religion$178,026Education$115,965Other$135,014Food & Nutrition$78,372Arts & Culture$75,000Philanthropy$46,789

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $351,037 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMIO Frontiers: $134,823 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC: $120,686 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLITERACY INITIATIVES: $115,965 over 5y, 37% of budgetLINACRE INC: $85,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetSmall Places: $78,372 over 2y, 19% of budgetInternational Sharif Bible Society: $75,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetAxia International: $46,789 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetKOLO GROUP: $24,134 over 3y, 14% of budgetAGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES: $20,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetDESTA: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOD'S ECONOMY INC: $7,032 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetRestoration Farm Ministries: $6,485 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetGLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,552 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Allegro Organizationa…Christian Community F…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Allegro Organizational Solutions IncTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Millennium Relief and Development Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Millennium Relief and Development Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Millennium Relief and Development Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home