How much does Milin Family Foundation give?

Milin Family Foundation reported 3 grants totaling $41,780 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 11 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Milin Family Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are International (53%), Religion (38%), Philanthropy (3%).

Who are Milin Family Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: American Friends of Magen David Adom ($141k), National Jewish Policy Center ($88k), American Israel Education Foundation Inc ($86k).

Does Milin Family Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 14% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Milin Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as Milin Family Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc, National Philanthropic Trust.

Where is Milin Family Foundation based?

Milin Family Foundation is based in FL.

Milin Family Foundation

Milin Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Milin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$42k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$40k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$380kReligion$270kPhilanthropy$20kHuman Services$18kArts & Culture$14kHealth$10kEducation$3kEmployment$2kOther$0

02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $2k
$10k–50k1 grant · $40k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$711k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
CHABAD OF WEST BOCA	$40,280
HEBREW SEMINARY FOUNDATION FOR THE DEAF	$1,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION	$500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 28% of Milin Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Milin Family Foundationlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 23% directed abroad (not shown)

How this is measured

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$664k · 12 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$664k

$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%

+126%

Still filing today

75%

23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
3× · 2022–2024 · $141k · revenue +190%
NJ
NATIONAL JEWISH POLICY CENTER
7× · 2017–2024 · $88k · revenue +86%
FF
Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc
4× · 2021–2024 · $47k · revenue +102%

Funded once

FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
one grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue -33%
JF
JEWISH FEDERATION OF S PALM BEACH
one grant, 2017 · $5k
JK
Joyce K Salzberg Center for Professional Developm
one grant, 2021 · $2k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—

Idf Memorial Foundation

Philanthropy

American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International

Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)

—

American Friends of Mosdos Montreal Inc

To promote and enhance jewish religious observance in canada

Religion

American Friends of Kohelet Policy Forum

The principal and primary intent of the organization is to support kohelet policy forum (the "forum"), a jerusalem-based non-profit policy center founded in 2012, comprised of leading academics and researchers.

—

Sherit Isroel

—

Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida

—

Foundation Stone Institute Inc

To promote a positive relationship between catholics and israelis.

—

Friends of Institute for Zionist

The organization seeks to reinforce the foundations of israel as a jewish and democratic state. it acts to promote programs to educate the israeli public on the importance of both values and to demonstrate how each contributes to and…

International

Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy

Friends of Ir David Inc

To provide assistance to organizations in the old city of jerusalem and the ancient city of david.

International

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Magen David Adom; the most unlike its peers is Hands On Tzedakah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/13

Grantees still filing

10/13

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

International$379,500Other$296,560Philanthropy$20,000Arts & Culture$8,953Human Services$6,900Health$3,500Education$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY13.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Milin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Milin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Milin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home