· Public charity
Milagro Foundation
The Milagro Foundation benefits underserved and vulnerable children around the world by making grants to community based tax-exempt organizations that work with children in the areas of education, health and the arts.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Three Square Food Bank | $30,000 |
| Turning Green | $30,000 |
| Hand in Hand | $25,000 |
| Canal Alliance | $25,000 |
| Performing Stars of Marin | $25,000 |
| Alive & FreeOmega Boys Club | $25,000 |
| Tenderloin Community Benefit District | $25,000 |
| Huckleberry Youth Programs | $25,000 |
| Project 150 | $25,000 |
| Project Avary | $25,000 |
| Enriching Lives Through Music | $15,000 |
| Ambassadors of Hope & Opportunity | $15,000 |
| Los Cenzontles Mexican Art Center | $15,000 |
| Larkin Street Youth Services | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $300k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- 1D10000 DEGREES5× · 2019–2024 · $230k · revenue +101%
- OGOPERATION GENESIS INC3× · 2017–2022 · $120k · revenue +641%
- MPMARIN PERFORMING STARS3× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- TDTiopaSantuario de Luz A Cone grant, 2017 · $100k
- VCVIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +36%
- HIHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRAone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.
For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.
The mission of Oakland Kids First is to increase youth voice, leadership and power to create engaging and equitable public schools where all students learn and lead.
Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.
Support and inspire children's natural curiosity and independence through free play during their out-of-school time.
Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.
The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…
By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
By strategically linking people, practice and policy, we make sure that children and youth in the most under-resourced communities receive quality expanded learning opportunities and that all their learning environments school, afterschool…
We make it possible for people in marin to achieve well-being by providing the vital services they need. together, we break down the barriers that get in the way of fair and lasting change in service to better outcomes for all.
San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bay Area Community Resources Inc and the most unlike its peers is Figo Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
- Who funds OPERATION GENESIS INC ↗
- Who funds MARIN PERFORMING STARS ↗
- Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds Turning Green ↗
- Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
- Who funds CANAL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PROJECT AVARY INC ALTERNATIVE VENTURES FOR AT RISK YOUTH ↗
- Who funds North of MarketTenderloin Community Benefit Corporation ↗
- Who funds LITTLE WISHES ↗
- Who funds VIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MARIN HORIZON SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
- Who funds PROJECT 150 ↗
- Who funds Alive and Free ↗
- Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
- Who funds AMBASSADORS OF HOPE AND OPPORTUNITY ↗
- Who funds Extrafood ↗
- Who funds Bridge the Gap College Prep ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Homeless Prenatal Program Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MOSAIC PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Womens Audio Mission ↗
- Who funds MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAND IN HAND ↗
- Who funds HALE OPIO KAUAI INC ↗
- Who funds PLAY MARIN ↗
- Who funds ANDY VARGAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Multicultural Center of Marin ↗
- Who funds Enriching Lives Through Music ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds OUTRIGHT VERMONT ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE IN MOTION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Fullerton Family Foundation · Crescent Porter Hale Foundation · The Morris Stulsaft Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · McNabb Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Milagro Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Outright Vermont — 13% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Zumix Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Milagro Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Milagro Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.