Skip to content
Mikuni Charitable Organization at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mikuni Charitable Organization

The organization's mission is to fund bequests for charitable and educational purposes by conducting an annual golf tournament fund raising event.

$227k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Education$285kYouth Development$230kHealth$130kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $80,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $226,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $146,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$111k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bayside Covenant Church$30,000
Sierra College Foundation$20,000
William Jessup University$20,000
Alternatives Pregnancy Center$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Gold Star Teen Adventures: $20k → 16%The Gathering Inn: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$595k · 5 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$595k
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-4%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WJ
    WILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2023 · $170k · revenue +28%
  • SC
    Sierra College Foundation
    4× · 2019–2023 · $125k · revenue +49%
  • AP
    Alternatives Pregnancy Center
    3× · 2020–2023 · $30k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • TC
    THRIVING CHURCHES INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -37%
  • GS
    GOLD STAR TEEN ADVENTURES
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -8%
  • CF
    CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Curebound

Curebound's mission is to accelerate cancer research and save lives. we raise and invest strategic funding for innovative adult and pediatric cancer research with one vision: cures in our lifetime.

Health
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
6
Colorectal Cancer Alliance

The mission of the colorectal cancer alliance is end colon and rectal cancer and support the nearly 50,000 afflicted with this disease each year. this is achieved by supporting preventative measures, accelerating research toward cures, and…

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
8
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
9
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
10
Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.

Health
11
Alk Positive Inc

We are a patient-driven organization seeking a cure and working to improve patients' quality of life and life expectancy worldwide.

—
12
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ticket to Dream Foundation; the most unlike its peers is William Jessup University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAYSIDE COVENANT CHURCH GRANITE BAY ROSEVILLE CA: $200,000 · OtherBAYSIDE COVENANT CHURCH GRANITE BAY ROSEVILLE CAWILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY: $170,000 · OtherWILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITYAlternatives Pregnancy Center: $30,000 · OtherAlternatives Pregnancy CenterCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherSierra College Foundation: $125,000 · EducationSierra College FoundationTHRIVING CHURCHES INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 · EducationTHRIVING CHURCHES INTERNA…THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATIONBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $70,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER U…Albie Aware Inc: $10,000 · HealthAlbie Aware In…KEATON'S CHILD CANCER ALLIANCE: $10,000 · HealthKEATON'S CHILD…GOLD STAR TEEN ADVENTURES: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERING INN: $10,000 · Human ServicesTICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$415,000Education$155,000Health$90,000Human Services$30,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY: $170,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSierra College Foundation: $125,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAlternatives Pregnancy Center: $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHRIVING CHURCHES INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGOLD STAR TEEN ADVENTURES: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GATHERING INN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlbie Aware Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetKEATON'S CHILD CANCER ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Placer Community Foun…Baird Foundation IncEnterprise Holdings F…Charities Aid Foundat…Network for GoodVanguard Charitable E…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Placer Community FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Placer Community Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mikuni Charitable Organization funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mikuni Charitable Organization. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mikuni Charitable Organization’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home