Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mike Meinze Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$32kHealth$25kReligion$20kFood & Nutrition$8kPhilanthropy$5kHousing & Shelter$3kArts & Culture$1kInternational$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$30k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ICE HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE$5,000
CENTRO LATINO CENTER$5,000
TOKEN 3 CLUB$4,800
DARE TO CARE FOOD BANK$1,000
SIMPSONVILLE CHRISTIAN CHURCH$1,000
SHELBY COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OPERATION CARE: $2k → 9%OPERATION CARE: $1k → 9%OPERATION CARE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$84k · 24 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
11

Total granted

$84k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+79%

Still filing today

46%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IH
    ICE HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +1%
  • OC
    OPERATION CARE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +90%
  • TH
    THE HOPE CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $3k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • CU
    CENTENARY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • FL
    Feed Louisville Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +31%
  • PR
    PIGEONS ROOST INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Responsibility House Inc

Supportive housing and substance use disorder treatment prorgrams serve the community by providing support and counseling to families and individuals who struggle with substance use disorders, homelessness, mental illness and/or hiv/aids.

Health
2
House of Hope of Kentucky Inc

To reach and help women who struggle with alcohol and chemical dependency; to offer assistance and resources to women while going through the rehabilitation process; to provide a safe environment and shelter to homeless women; to provide…

Health
3
Grace House of Memphis Tennessee

To provide substance abuse treatment and rehabilitation programs to women in-and-around the memphis tennessee area.

—
4
The Mend House Sober Living Community

The Mend House is a sober living community for men, in Knoxville, Tn. which empowers them to gain control over their actions, decisions and choices. The Mend House allows men to enjoy clean, sober and stable housing for up to 2 years while…

Health
5
House of Hope for Recovery Inc

Rehabilitation of adult alcoholics and drug addicts.

—
6
Healing House Inc

Healing House, Inc. is a substance use disorder recovery organization. Our mission is to enrich the lives and spiritual well-being of all we serve and improve the safety and welfare of our community by equipping each participant with…

Human Services
7
Jefferson Street Baptist Center Inc

Re:center ministries reconciles homeless and hurting people to god, family and community by the power of christ in partnership with the local church.

Religion
8
Greater Louisville Behavior Health Center

The mission of Greater Louisville Behavioral Health is to provide services surrounding behavioral health and substance abuse, especially to those in the criminal justice system

Human Services
9
Favor House Ministries Inc

To provide temporary housing for substance abusers

Health
10
Hope House Rescue Mission Inc

Hope house rescue mission strives to eliminate homelessness. our mission is "to break the cycle of poverty and despair... one life at a time." we provide physical, emotional, mental and spiritual resources regardless of race, religion or…

Human Services
11
Place of Hope Inc

The primary exempt purpose of the organization is to provide excellent alcohol and drug treatment programs and services, temporary shelter for the homeless, and food for the hungry, in a caring, christian environment.

Health
12
Harwood House

To provide non-hospital, in-patient treatment to adult men and women recovering from drug and alcohol dependence.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Healing Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Family Community Clinic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
15/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRO LATINO CENTER: $23,500 · OtherCENTRO LATINO CENTERSIMPSONVILLE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $13,000 · OtherSIMPSONVILLE CHRISTIAN CHURCHTOKEN 3 CLUB: $4,800 · OtherTOKEN 3 CLUBFRANCISCAN SHELTER HOUSE INC: $4,100 · OtherFRANCISCAN SHELTER HOUSE INCTHE HEALING PLACE INC: $3,200 · OtherPROPAPA MISSIONS: $3,000 · OtherBRIGHTON RECOVERY CENTER: $2,450 · Other+20 more: $16,300 · Other+20 moreICE HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INC: $13,500 · HealthICE HOUSE OF LOUI…HOUSE OF RUTH INC: $800 · HealthHOUSE OF RUTH INC+1 more: $200 · HealthOPERATION CARE INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $3,200 · Housing & ShelterSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC: $600 · Housing & ShelterDARE TO CARE INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionFeed Louisville Inc: $1,500 · Food & NutritionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 · International
Other$70,350Health$14,500Human Services$4,000Housing & Shelter$3,800Food & Nutrition$3,500International$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetICE HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INC: $13,500 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetOPERATION CARE INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $3,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEALING PLACE INC: $3,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDARE TO CARE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPIGEONS ROOST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE MORTON CENTER INC: $950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN CENTER INC: $950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH INC: $800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRHAVEN RESCUE MISSION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC: $600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFamily Community Clinic Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ICE HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALING PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds DARE TO CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Feed Louisville Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds PIGEONS ROOST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MORTON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRHAVEN RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Community Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Louisville IncKY25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Judge Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mike Meinze Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mike Meinze Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mike Meinze Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mike Meinze Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mike Meinze’s filings →

    More from the funding graph