Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mike and Dorothy Vondra Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$294k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.0MArts & Culture$190kHealth$129kReligion$120kCrime & Legal$54kCommunity Improvement$45kEnvironment$44kYouth Development$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $192k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY SCHOOL NAPLES$130,200
NAPLES PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$61,632
HIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUND$20,000
GOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF$16,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
COMMUNITY SCHOOL NAPLES$11,800
AMERICA SCORES$10,000
BARRINGTON AREA CONSERVATION TRUST$10,000
SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES$5,000
MARCH OF DIMES$3,500
CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF WILL &$3,200
Individual grant recipient$3,000
CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL CAUCUS FOUNDAT$2,500
THREE FIRES COUNCIL$2,500
ST CHARLES COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BAPS CHARITIES: $500 → 11%BAPS CHARITIES: $500 → 11%BAPS CHARITIES: $500 → 11%ST CHARLES COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%LAZARUS HOUSE: $1k → 8%BLACK MEN UNITED FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%CHRISTMAS IN THE WARDS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 28 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
40

Total granted

$1.6M
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+17%

Still filing today

46%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $978k · revenue +53%
  • NP
    NAPLES PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $161k · revenue +12%
  • KF
    KENNEDY FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $22k · revenue +182%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • IA
    Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +14%
  • PH
    PROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue ×13
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
2
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Us Naval Academy Foundation Inc

To support, promote, and advance the mission of the naval academy.

Education
5
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
6
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
7
The Executives' Club of Chicago

To be chicagos premier resources for connecting, developing, and growing best-in-class leaders to provide established and emerging leaders opportunities to develop and nurture meaningful relationships, participate in innovative…

—
8
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
11
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
12
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
22/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $977,786 · EducationCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC+5 more: $9,654 · EducationHIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUND: $81,207 · OtherHIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FO…Individual grant recipient: $52,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JOHN NEUMANN CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherST JOHN NEUMANN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIllinois Asphalt Pavement Association: $20,000 · OtherST MARGARET MARY CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherAMERICA SCORES: $20,000 · OtherPROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $17,000 · Other+46 more: $140,625 · Other+46 moreNAPLES PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $161,467 · Arts & CultureNAPLES PERFO…GOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC: $18,000 · Arts & CultureGOLISANO CHI…THEATREZONEINC: $10,900 · Arts & CultureTHEATREZONEI…BARRINGTON AREA CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentMARCH OF DIMES INC: $19,500 · HealthMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $2,500 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · Health+2 more: $800 · HealthKENNEDY FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $21,540 · PhilanthropySEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Public Benefit
Education$987,440Other$475,832Arts & Culture$190,367Environment$30,000Health$23,800Philanthropy$21,540Public Benefit$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $977,786 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetNAPLES PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $161,467 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetBARRINGTON AREA CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $30,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetKENNEDY FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $21,540 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetIllinois Asphalt Pavement Association: $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $19,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $17,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHEATREZONEINC: $10,900 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSpecial Children's Charities: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $5,554 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA KANE COUNTY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAPS CHARITIES INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWARD 365 NFP: $1,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBLACK MEN UNITED FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST CHARLES COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWESTERN SOCIETY OF ENGINEERS: $1,200 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLAZARUS HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO CITY COUNCIL LATINO CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRESIDENTIAL HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHREE FIRES COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #127: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $210 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIREFIGHTERS SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON AREA CONSERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds KENNEDY FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association ↗
  • Who funds SEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THEATREZONEINC ↗
  • Who funds BARTLETT HANOVER PARK SPORTS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Special Children's Charities ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA SCORES ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds CASA KANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BAPS CHARITIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Foundation IncFL13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · United Way Worldwide · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mike and Dorothy Vondra Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mike and Dorothy Vondra Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mike and Dorothy Vondra Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mike and Dorothy Vondra Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mike and Dorothy Vondra’s filings →

    More from the funding graph