· Private foundation
Diabetes Care Foundation
TO FOCUS ON IMPOVING THE LIVES OF THOSE WITH DIABETES.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $210k
- $250k+3 grants · $3.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $1,450,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION | $1,400,000 |
| BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE | $700,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100,000 |
| CUES SCHOOL SYSTEM | $60,000 |
| VILLAGE FIRE DEPARTMENT | $50,000 |
| HEALING GIFT FREE CLINIC | $20,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY - LOCAL NE BRANCH | $20,000 |
| FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND | $15,000 |
| PROJECT HARMONY | $15,000 |
| OPEN DOOR MISSION | $15,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS | $10,000 |
| EAST SPRING BRANCH FOOD PANTRY | $5,000 |
| WESTSIDE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $9.2M · revenue +31%
- CUCreighton University5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +45%
- CHCHI HEALTH FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $285k · revenue +124%
Funded once
- HAHIGHER AIMone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +8%
- AOANNUNCIATION ORTHODOX CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $25k
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -58%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.
Provides a means whereby the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the pediatric specialty physicians can be marshaled to develop, promote, and make available to patients from omaha, ne and the surrounding area, pediatric, academic, and…
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and committees through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.
Support the mission and social services programs of catholic charities of the archdiocese of omaha, inc.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
Nebraska methodist hospital (commonly know as "methodist hospital") is an acute care facility dedicated to bringing high quality care for the mind, body and spirit of every person. we provide community-based health care, health education…
Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chi Health Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Whyarts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Creighton University ↗
- Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
- Who funds CHI HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MADONNA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA WRITERS COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds THE COALITION ON HUMAN TRAFFICKING INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
- Who funds ATAXIA CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds WHYARTS INC ↗
- Who funds EAST SPRING BRANCH FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds HIGHER AIM ↗
- Who funds HEALING GIFT FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HARMONY ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Backer Family Charitable Trust · Seline Family Foundation · Duncan Family Trust · Mammel Family Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Diabetes Care Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Diabetes Care Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Diabetes Care Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.