Skip to content

· Community foundation

Midlands Community Foundation

To be a catalyst for lasting impact in sarpy and cass counties and to give opportunities to organizations and individuals to pursue their charitable goals.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$767k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.5MRecreation & Sports$1.3MEducation$805kReligion$726kArts & Culture$688kHealth$580kHousing & Shelter$514kPublic Safety & Disaster$420kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 38 grants below total $1,598,778, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,930,337 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $331,559 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $551k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $218k
  • $250k+1 grant · $767k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBORGOOD COMMUNITY PANTRY$767,000
CITY OF BELLEVUE$125,637
PAPILLION LAVISTA SOUTH HIGH SCHOOL$91,918
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD$48,862
FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND$40,000
ST PATRICKS CATHOLIC CHURCH$40,000
LOFTE COMMUNITY THEATRE$36,619
PAPILLION LAVISTA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$35,000
SARPY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$30,000
LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN$25,000
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$24,500
CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH$24,000
GRETNA NEIGHBORS$23,707
Individual grant recipient$20,668
NEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $451k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GLEN DOHERTY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%SENCA: $5k → 13%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $6k → 6%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $7k → 17%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 12%SHARE A FARE INC: $5k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $20k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $12k → 12%BOYSTOWN: $10k → 12%BOYSTOWN: $10k → 12%BOYSTOWN: $7k → 12%METRO AREA CONTINUUM OF CARE FOR HOMELESS: $15k → 12%BOYSTOWN: $5k → 12%SARPY COMMUNITY YMCA: $10k → 6%SARPY COMMUNITY YMCA: $5k → 6%BELLEVUE TOGETHER: $8k → 6%GRIEF'S JOURNEY: $8k → 12%CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER: $15k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $8k → 12%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC: $6k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $6k → 12%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC: $6k → 12%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA INC: $5k → 12%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA INC: $5k → 12%HETRA: $13k → 6%HETRA: $11k → 6%OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $35k → 12%HETRA: $8k → 6%DREAMWEAVER FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $5k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $10k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $7k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $55k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $20k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $10k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $8k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $5k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Midlands Community Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in NE; by stated purpose, 82%.

Midlands Community Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 90 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

90 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 62 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
153

Total granted

$5.7M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+4%

Still filing today

61%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $147k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NeighborGood Community Pantry
    9× · 2017–2025 · $975k · revenue +942%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2022 · $265k · revenue +57%
  • SC
    SARPY COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    3× · 2020–2023 · $245k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • MF
    MUSCO FINANCE LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $183k
  • PR
    PAPIO-MISSOURI RIVER NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT
    one grant, 2021 · $105k
  • CO
    CITY OF BELLEVUE
    one grant, 2018 · $94k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
2
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
3
Nebraska Realtors Association

Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members

—
4
Nebraska Safety Council

Provide education and leadership to empower people to live safe and healthy.

—
5
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska Foundation
Human Services
6
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
7
Nebraska Organ Recovery System

We transform lives through organ and tissue donation.

Health
8
Nebraska Pediatric Practice Inc

Provides a means whereby the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the pediatric specialty physicians can be marshaled to develop, promote, and make available to patients from omaha, ne and the surrounding area, pediatric, academic, and…

Health
9
Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy
10
Nebraska Alliance of Child Advocacy Centers

To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
11
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
12
Support Nebraska

To promote charitable giving, community involvement and prosperity in the state of nebraska by engaging community and business leaders through charitable assistance and to bring people together and support community causes in a fun and…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Bridges Out of Poverty Inc; the most unlike its peers is Whyarts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 255 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
116/122
Grantees still filing
78/122
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $408,600 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHSARPY COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $245,255 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $217,898 · OtherTHE LOFTE ASSOCIATION INC: $199,119 · OtherMUSCO FINANCE LLC: $182,500 · Other+149 more: $3,980,021 · Other+149 moreNeighborGood Community Pantry: $975,077 · Food & NutritionNeighborGood …+1 more: $10,000 · Food & NutritionHEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $98,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $52,000 · Human ServicesGLEN DOHERTY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesOMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY INC: $30,919 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC: $21,500 · Human ServicesKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $16,500 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $15,126 · Human ServicesCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHRESHOLD COC: $15,000 · Human Services+5 more: $43,066 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $265,000 · EducationPAPILLION LA VISTA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $54,150 · EducationBELLEVUE KIWANIS FOUNDATION: $25,723 · EducationBellevue University: $20,000 · Education+2 more: $17,000 · EducationMIDLANDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $192,125 · PhilanthropyLouisville Public School Foundation: $52,280 · PhilanthropyMETRO AREA YOUTH FOUNDATION: $40,000 · PhilanthropyCATTLEMEN'S BALL OF NEBRASKA INC: $27,500 · PhilanthropyARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,500 · PhilanthropyPATRIOTIC PRODUCTIONS INC: $171,159 · Arts & CultureHONOR AND REMEMBER INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureSarpy County Historical Society: $48,500 · Arts & CultureOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY: $25,000 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $9,775 · Arts & CultureLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $169,900 · HealthAssure Womens Center: $37,550 · HealthCHI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $24,700 · HealthProject Pinkd Inc: $20,600 · HealthHARBOR HOUSE: $14,900 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $13,093 · Health+4 more: $38,000 · Health
Other$5,233,393Food & Nutrition$985,077Human Services$429,111Education$381,873Philanthropy$324,405Arts & Culture$319,434Health$318,743

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNeighborGood Community Pantry: $975,077 over 9y, 20% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $265,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSARPY COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $245,255 over 3y, 17% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $217,898 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LOFTE ASSOCIATION INC: $199,119 over 5y, 18% of budgetMIDLANDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $192,125 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetPATRIOTIC PRODUCTIONS INC: $171,159 over 4y, 12% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $169,900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $98,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGRETNA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $78,628 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetEASTERN NEBRASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $72,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $70,317 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SARPY COUNTY INC: $69,650 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetPAPILLION LA VISTA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $54,150 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLouisville Public School Foundation: $52,280 over 4y, 20% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $52,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $51,230 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetPAPILLION-LA VISTA TRAP TEAM: $50,261 over 2y, 29% of budgetHONOR AND REMEMBER INC: $50,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetGLEN DOHERTY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetSarpy County Historical Society: $48,500 over 3y, 15% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC: $45,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKiwanis Club of Omaha Inc Foundation: $44,053 over 4y, 33% of budgetLift Up Sarpy County: $41,297 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetSHELTERING TREE INC: $40,360 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMETRO AREA YOUTH FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetAssure Womens Center: $37,550 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES: $35,300 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC: $35,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $33,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY INC: $30,919 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMOSAIC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA VIETNAM VETERANS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS WILDLIFE CENTER: $30,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetNEBRASKA CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS ASSN: $29,857 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetCATTLEMEN'S BALL OF NEBRASKA INC: $27,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBELLEVUE KIWANIS FOUNDATION: $25,723 over 3y, 63% of budgetBANISTER'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $25,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $24,700 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFONTENELLE FOREST: $23,216 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMERRYMAKERS ASSOCIATION: $22,900 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC: $21,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetProject Pinkd Inc: $20,600 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetIRONHAWK JUNIORS TRIATHLON CLUB: $20,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOMAHA MULTI SPORT COMPLEX: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEBRASKA MISSION OF MERCY: $20,000 over 1y, 23% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NeighborGood Community Pantry ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SARPY COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds THE LOFTE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLANDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PATRIOTIC PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds GRETNA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN NEBRASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SARPY COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PAPILLION LA VISTA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Louisville Public School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PAPILLION-LA VISTA TRAP TEAM ↗
  • Who funds HONOR AND REMEMBER INC ↗
  • Who funds GLEN DOHERTY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Sarpy County Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE85.4× affinity44 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · Nebraska Community Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Midlands Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Midlands Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Midlands Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Midlands Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 255 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Midlands’ filings →

    More from the funding graph