Skip to content

· Public charity

Mid America Assistance Coalition

The mission of the MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION, maac, is to improve the lives of economically vulnerable populations through innovative client services, public policy advocacy, and by developing information systems that help other assistance organizations serve clients more efficiently and comprehensively.

$6.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6.2M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$29MCrime & Legal$148kReligion$98kFood & Nutrition$97kHousing & Shelter$81kPhilanthropy$41kEducation$16kCommunity Improvement$14k
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $89k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $84k
  • $250k+2 grants · $6.6M
$5,768
Median grant
2
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE LIHEAP$6,159,019
EVERGY KANSAS CENTRAL INC$436,554
THE SALVATION ARMY$41,184
BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER INC$15,243
GREATER KC LINC INC$14,649
METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY$13,238
REDEMPTORIST CENTER$7,451
GRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM$7,413
COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE COUNCIL$7,358
RECONCILIATION SERVICES$6,878
GUADALUPE CENTERS INC$6,484
COUNTY OF JOHNSON (KANSAS)$6,411
NORTHLAND ASSISTANCE CENTER$5,917
LEE'S SUMMIT SOCIAL SERVICES$5,768
MOUND CITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,705
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF EXCELSIOR SPRINGS: $8k → 8%GREATER KC LINC INC: $1.6M → 15%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF EXCELSIOR SPRINGS: $7k → 8%GREATER KC LINC INC: $844k → 15%GREATER KC LINC INC: $295k → 15%IN AS MUCH MINISTRY: $5k → 8%GREATER KC LINC INC: $17k → 15%GREATER KC LINC INC: $15k → 15%GREATER KC LINC INC: $13k → 15%REDEMPTORIST CENTER: $12k → 15%REDEMPTORIST CENTER: $9k → 15%GREATER KC LINC INC: $9k → 15%REDEMPTORIST CENTER: $8k → 15%REDEMPTORIST CENTER: $7k → 15%REDEMPTORIST CENTER: $7k → 15%GREATER KC LINC INC: $7k → 15%HEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER: $7k → 15%GREATER KC LINC INC: $6k → 15%HEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER: $5k → 15%HEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER: $5k → 15%BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER INC: $26k → 15%BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER INC: $21k → 15%BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER INC: $19k → 15%BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER INC: $19k → 15%BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER INC: $18k → 15%BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER INC: $16k → 15%BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER INC: $15k → 15%BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER INC: $12k → 15%BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER INC: $11k → 15%GRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $14k → 15%GRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $11k → 15%GRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $9k → 15%GRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $7k → 15%GRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $7k → 15%GRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $6k → 15%GRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $6k → 15%RECONCILIATION SERVICES: $36k → 15%RECONCILIATION SERVICES: $7k → 15%RECONCILIATION SERVICES: $7k → 15%RECONCILIATION SERVICES: $5k → 15%GUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $12k → 15%GUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $12k → 15%GUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $11k → 15%GUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $8k → 15%GUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $7k → 15%GUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $6k → 15%GUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $6k → 15%GUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30M · 30 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -35% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
1

Total granted

$30M
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-35%

Still filing today

77%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $995 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GK
    GREATER KC LINC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +134%
  • ML
    METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $233k · revenue +120%
  • BS
    Bishop Sullivan Center Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $157k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KANSAS CITY - ST JOSEPH INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southeast Kansas Community Action P

Addressing the causes and effects of poverty by uniting staff, individuals, families, and community partners to provide quality, comprehensive services through compassionate, respectful relationships.

Community Improvement
2
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
3
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
4
Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri

Inspired by the gospel of the beatitudes as proclaimed by Jesus Christ, Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri is committed to providing care and creating hope for the lives of the vulnerable through compassionate social…

Human Services
5
Mental Health Center of East Central Kansas

To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.

Health
6
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

—
7
Community Services Inc of Northwest Missouri

Community services, incorporated's mission is to empower the people of need in northwest missouri to achieve their goals and improve their quality of life.

—
8
Community Action Inc

Helping people move from poverty towards prosperity.

Human Services
9
Council Apartments Inc

Provide high quality living and services to enable lower income older adult residents of the managed apartment buildings to flourish independently; and create inspiring programming to enable both residents and community seniors to maintain…

Housing & Shelter
10
St Louis Association of Community Organizations

Community Development and Community Center and social services

—
11
Kansas Association of Community Action Programs Inc

Kacap supports community action agencies and other human services organizations in thier local, state and national efforts to end poverty.

Public Benefit
12
Central City Churches Inc

To provide food through our pantry, hot meals, day shelter, (computer, fax, copier and phone access), for people in need residing in zips 53205, 53208, 53210 and 53233.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc; the most unlike its peers is In As Much Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE LIHEAP: $24,523,934 · OtherMID AMERICA ASSISTANCE LIHEAP+16 more: $1,930,488 · Other+16 moreGREATER KC LINC INC: $2,787,185 · Human ServicesGREATER KC L…Bishop Sullivan Center Inc: $157,144 · Human Services+10 more: $415,107 · Human Services+10 moreDELLA LAMB COMMUNITY SERVICES: $40,884 · PhilanthropyCity Union Mission: $28,379 · Housing & ShelterOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $16,388 · Education
Other$26,454,422Human Services$3,359,436Philanthropy$40,884Housing & Shelter$28,379Education$16,388

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER KC LINC INC: $2,787,185 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetMETROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY: $233,254 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetBishop Sullivan Center Inc: $157,144 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC: $113,139 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLEE'S SUMMIT SOCIAL SERVICES: $74,409 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetRECONCILIATION SERVICES: $71,272 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetGUADALUPE CENTERS INC: $69,319 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Services League of Jackson County: $61,586 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetGRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $60,825 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetREDEMPTORIST SOCIAL SERVICES CENTER INC: $53,930 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetGREATER KANSAS CITY HOUSING INFORMATION CENTER: $52,551 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE COUNCIL INC: $50,148 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetTHE NORTHLAND ASSISTANCE CENTER: $43,937 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetDELLA LAMB COMMUNITY SERVICES: $40,884 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER: $33,937 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF EXCELSIOR SPRINGS ASSOCIATION: $31,454 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetRAYTOWN EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $29,359 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetCity Union Mission: $28,379 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetIN AS MUCH MINISTRY: $22,106 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $16,388 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSeton Center Inc: $16,069 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWEST CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $14,473 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $9,260 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KANSAS CITY - ST JOSEPH INC: $1,418 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER KC LINC INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds Bishop Sullivan Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds LEE'S SUMMIT SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds RECONCILIATION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GUADALUPE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Services League of Jackson County ↗
  • Who funds GRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds REDEMPTORIST SOCIAL SERVICES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER KANSAS CITY HOUSING INFORMATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NORTHLAND ASSISTANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DELLA LAMB COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF EXCELSIOR SPRINGS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds RAYTOWN EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds City Union Mission ↗
  • Who funds IN AS MUCH MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
  • Who funds Seton Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEST CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KANSAS CITY - ST JOSEPH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO46.3× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Judge C F Moulton Christmas Poor Fund · Health Forward Foundation · Giving the Basics Inc · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mid America Assistance Coalition funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mid America Assistance Coalition. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mid America Assistance Coalition?

    Find your warmest path to Mid America Assistance Coalition through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mid America Assistance Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph