How much did MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION grant in FY2025?

MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION reported 28 grants totaling $6,769,265 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION based?

MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION is based in MO.

MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION

The mission of the MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION, maac, is to improve the lives of economically vulnerable populations through innovative client services, public policy advocacy, and by developing information systems that help other assistance organizations serve clients more efficiently and comprehensively.

$6.8M

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$6.2M

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 89% of MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

ministryfood pantrysocialemergencychurchneedypotential

2020

ministryfood pantrysocialeducationalchurchemergencyneedy

2021

ministryfood pantryaccesssocialencourageeducationalemergency

2022

immediatecounseling

2023

—

2024

ministryfood pantryeducationallow-incomesocialchurchemergency

2025

educationalnecessarylow-incomesocialeconomicself-sufficiencyneedy

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k22 grants · $89k
$10k–50k4 grants · $84k
$250k+2 grants · $6.6M

$5,768

Median grant

States reached

$16M

Total assets

Largest grants

MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE LIHEAP$6,159,019
EVERGY KANSAS CENTRAL INC$436,554
THE SALVATION ARMY$41,184
BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER INC$15,243
GREATER KC LINC INC$14,649
METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY$13,238
REDEMPTORIST CENTER$7,451
GRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM$7,413
COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE COUNCIL$7,358
RECONCILIATION SERVICES$6,878
GUADALUPE CENTERS INC$6,484
COUNTY OF JOHNSON (KANSAS)$6,411
NORTHLAND ASSISTANCE CENTER$5,917
LEE'S SUMMIT SOCIAL SERVICES$5,768
MOUND CITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,705

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 8%. 99% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$30M · 29 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$30M

$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%

+45%

Still filing today

76%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $995 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GK
GREATER KC LINC INC
8× · 2018–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +58%
ML
METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY
8× · 2018–2025 · $197k · revenue +107%
BS
BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER INC
8× · 2018–2025 · $136k · revenue +34%

Funded once

SC
SETON CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +45%
CC
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KANSAS CITY-ST JOSEPH INC
one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Catholic Charities of Central and

Inspired by the Gospel of the Beatitudes as proclaimed by Jesus Christ, Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri is committed to providing care and creating hope for the lives of the vulnerable through compassionate social…

Human Services

Southeast Kansas Community Action P

Addressing the causes and effects of poverty by uniting staff, individuals, families, and community partners to provide quality, comprehensive services through compassionate, respectful relationships.

Community Improvement

Kc Common Good Inc

Our mission is to create an environment where all citizens can live safely and have access to real opportunities.

Employment

The Food Bank for Central

Hunger relief network sharing millions of pounds of nutritious food with thousands of missourians.

Food & Nutrition

St Louis Association of Community Organizations

Community Development and Community Center social services

—

Kansas Association of Community

Kacap supports community action agencies and other human services organizations in thier local, state and national efforts to end poverty.

Public Benefit

Care Center of Kansas City

Swope ridge geriatric center is a not for-profit corporation whose mission is to provide a continuum of long term care services to our community. we are committed to delivering quality health care with compassion and caring for adult…

—

Jewish Community Center

To provide health and welfare services to the st. louis community

Human Services

Community Council of South Central

To be the service delivery agent to the poor. the agency will identify needs and prioritize them and promote, secure, and use all available resources to alleviate poverty. our intent is to enable low-income individuals and families to…

—

Mid-America Regional Council Community

Marc csc administers collaborative programs that benefit kansas city area communities.

Community Improvement

North Central Kansas Housing

Community Improvement

Mental Health Center of East Central

To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Kansas City - and the most unlike its peers is Greater Kc Linc Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/32

the rest of the field

11%

731/6,397

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/24

Grantees still filing

19/24

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$26,215,336Human Services$3,267,085Philanthropy$33,046Housing & Shelter$23,631Education$13,556

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO43.5× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Health Care Foundation of Greater Kc · Judge C F Moulton Christmas Poor Fund · Giving the Basics Inc · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · After the Harvest

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NORTHLAND ASSISTANCE CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue held over 9 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 431351983 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on NORTHLAND ASSISTANCE CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Mid America Assistance Coalition?

Find your warmest path to Mid America Assistance Coalition through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mid America Assistance Coalition?

More from the funding graph

MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mid America Assistance Coalition?

More from the funding graph