Skip to content

· Private foundation

Micole Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$321k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$251k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.6MEducation$260kAnimals$165kHuman Services$165kEnvironment$80kReligion$70kHealth$69kYouth Development$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $250k+1 grant · $251k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEGGY NOTEBAERT NATURE MUSEUM$250,500
WEST MILWAUKEE POLICE COM$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
RANCH HAND RESCUE$15,000
HOPE CHICAGO$15,000
CHICAGO BOTANICAL GARDEN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $166k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HESED HOUSE: $70k → 8%HESED HOUSE: $45k → 8%OMNI YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 8%HESED HOUSE: $30k → 8%HESED HOUSE: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
AR
TN
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 13 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$3.3M
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+134%

Still filing today

54%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +5%
  • PA
    PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $165k · revenue +139%
  • RH
    Ranch Hands Rescue
    7× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +210%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • CF
    CHILDREN'S FUND INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
2
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
3
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
4
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
5
Children's Museum of Oak Park

To spark curiosity and creativity in all young children through positive, play-based learning experiences.

Arts & Culture
6
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
7
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
10
The Chicago Scholars Foundation

Chicago scholars is transforming the leadership landscape of our city by resolving the fundamental barriers to success for academically driven, first generation college students from under-resourced communities.

Education
11
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
12
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Horticultural Society; the most unlike its peers is Ranch Hands Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
13/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $2,545,500 · Arts & CultureTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureST RAPHAEL CATHOLIC HOME & SCHOOL: $72,100 · OtherST RAPHAEL CAT…ST FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL: $65,000 · OtherST FRANCIS HIG…SAINT MARY CHURCH: $55,000 · OtherSAINT MARY CHU…STEVENSON HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherSTEVENSON HIGH…Individual grant recipient: $49,000 · OtherIndividual gra…Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual gra…ST OLAF FUND: $23,300 · OtherHOPE CHICAGO INC: $20,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S FUND INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 · OtherWEST MILWAUKEE POLICE COM: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherST MARY'S PARISH: $15,000 · Other+5 more: $30,000 · Other+5 morePUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $165,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesRanch Hands Rescue: $120,000 · AnimalsHouston Zoo Inc: $45,000 · AnimalsCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $76,500 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF RADNOR LAKE: $3,000 · EnvironmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $43,000 · Youth DevelopmentAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $15,000 · Health
Arts & Culture$2,550,500Other$449,400Human Services$166,000Animals$165,000Environment$79,500Youth Development$43,000Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $2,545,500 over 9y, 12% of budgetPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $165,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetRanch Hands Rescue: $120,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $76,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Zoo Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $43,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE CHICAGO INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUNITING VOICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE MILLION DEGREES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF RADNOR LAKE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOMNI YOUTH SERVICES INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Ranch Hands Rescue ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Houston Zoo Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds AROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD ↗
  • Who funds UNITING VOICES ↗
  • Who funds ONE MILLION DEGREES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF RADNOR LAKE ↗
  • Who funds OMNI YOUTH SERVICES INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Micole Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Micole Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Micole Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Micole Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Micole’s filings →

    More from the funding graph