Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michelle Chiou Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$181k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$153k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$333kHousing & Shelter$71kReligion$45kInternational$33kYouth Development$31kHuman Services$12kPhilanthropy$8kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $153k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Michelle Chiou Foundation-MCF Taiwa$153,306
Individual grant recipient$20,000
CHU FOUNDATION$8,059
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 45% of grant dollars ($243k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 55% that went abroad ($300k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Downtown Women's Center: $5k → 14%Solutions for Change: $10k → 11%Downtown Women's Center: $1k → 14%Children of the Night: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 55% of all-years giving ($300k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Taiwan$300k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Michelle Chiou Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Michelle Chiou Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 60% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$483k · 13 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$483k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+42%

Still filing today

38%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesReligionEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $33k · revenue +2%
  • IF
    INDIVIDUAL & FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK
    2× · 2019–2020 · $10k · revenue +208%
  • DW
    DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER
    2× · 2019–2020 · $6k · revenue +193%

Funded once

  • PO
    Pencils of Promise Inc POP
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • SF
    SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +42%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
2
Transition House

Transition House is dedicated to the solution of family homelessness in the Santa Barbara community. Capable and motivated families with children are offered life tools and respectful, non-sectarian residential services designed to…

Housing & Shelter
3
San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation

San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation works to empower and support women who are experiencing housing instability and sexual exploitation or trafficking, by creating survivor-centered spaces, services advocacy and community…

Unclassified
4
Colette's Children's Home Inc

Colettes childrens home provides housing and supportive services to homeless women and children with nowhere to turn. we work to remove the barriers that cause displacement and provide the means for transition from homelessness to stable…

Housing & Shelter
5
Fair Opportunity for Change Inc

The mission of fair opportunity for change, inc. is to provide quality interim supportive housing services to homeless single adults and families with children.

Crime & Legal
6
Women in Need Inc

To provide safe housing, critical services, and ground-breaking programs to help homeless women and their children rebuild their lives.

Human Services
7
Sun Community Service

Serving people in whatcom county with behavioral health needs by providing emergency shelter and supportive housing.

—
8
Children of the Immaculate Heart

Children of The Immaculate Heart Exists to promote the dignity of the human person and to uphold the goodness and beauty of both the masculine and feminine genius. Specifically, Children of The Immaculate Heart serves men, women, and…

Human Services
9
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
10
New Orleans Women & Children's Shelter Inc

Homeless shelter for women and children and families transitioning through training from homelessness and poverty to stability and self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
11
Children's Home of Stockton Inc

CHS guides youth and young adults forward to hope and resiliency.

—
12
Urban Angels Sf

Urban Angels SF (Urban Angels) is a not-for-profit organization with the mission to sustain the homeless of San Francisco while they are in transition from living on the streets to safe permanent housing. Our volunteers provide sustenance…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Let It Be Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Michelle Chiou Foundation-MCF Taiwa: $299,902 · OtherMichelle Chiou Foundation-MCF TaiwaIndividual grant recipient: $44,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPencils of Promise Inc POP: $29,750 · OtherPencils of Promise Inc POPMARINERS CHURCH: $18,102 · Other+12 more: $68,059 · Other+12 moreSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $33,066 · EducationBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION: $21,000 · ReligionZOE INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 · ReligionSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $6,000 · Human ServicesChildren of the Night: $1,000 · Human ServicesINDIVIDUAL & FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK: $10,000 · PhilanthropyLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$459,813Education$33,066Religion$22,000Human Services$17,000Philanthropy$10,000Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $33,066 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetINDIVIDUAL & FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LET IT BE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetZOE INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of the Night: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INDIVIDUAL & FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE LET IT BE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ZOE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Children of the Night ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michelle Chiou Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michelle Chiou Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Michelle Chiou Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Michelle Chiou Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michelle Chiou’s filings →

    More from the funding graph