· Private foundation
Michael M Peacock Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $61k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $31,000 |
| ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE | $11,000 |
| THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO | $9,000 |
| CAT RESCUE CORP | $7,778 |
| PAWSITIVE RESCUERS OF EL PASO | $7,530 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER | $5,000 |
| CENTERSTONE OF TENNESSEE | $5,000 |
| I'M ALMOST HOME ANIMAL RESCUE | $4,000 |
| MOBILITY WORLDWIDE SAN ANTONIO | $2,530 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,530 |
| CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL & FAMILY VIOLENCE | $2,530 |
| BOOKS ARE GEMS | $2,530 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO | $2,530 |
| COLEL CHABAD | $2,530 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCHILDSAFE3× · 2020–2022 · $52k · revenue +497%
- FOFriends of Santa Rosa Foundation2× · 2020–2021 · $40k · revenue +6%
- LTLas Trampas School Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $40k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- MCMILITARY-CIVILIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +44%
- CBCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER S TXone grant, 2021 · $19k
- CBChildren's Bereavement Ctr of San Antonioone grant, 2020 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…
Hospice of san angelo, inc. (hospice or organization) provides an expert approach to care for those living with a limiting illness in the comfort of their own home and designated nursing homes throughout the twelve counties in the west…
See schedule orancho coastal is dedicated to the rescue and shelter of abandoned companion animals. it encourages adoptions into loving homes and provides educational and community outreach programs designed to enhance the human-animal…
To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.
To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.
The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…
The prevention of suffering, neglect, abuse, and cruelty of animalsby providing information, raising public awareness of animal issues,and promoting responsible pet ownership and kindness to all livingthings in west texas.
The mission of hospice of el paso, inc. is to provide interdisciplinary care designed to meet the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of patients and their families who are coping with terminal illness and resulting losses.
Pajaro Valley Shelter Services provides families with a path toward self-sufficient futures through short-and longer-term housing and supportive services.
To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…
To support animals, save lives, and spread compassion.
The spca of texas is dedicated to providing every animal exceptional care and a loving home.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Bereavement Center of South Texas and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDSAFE ↗
- Who funds Friends of Santa Rosa Foundation ↗
- Who funds Las Trampas School Inc ↗
- Who funds VETERANS NON PROFIT ↗
- Who funds MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER ↗
- Who funds MILITARY-CIVILIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION ↗
- Who funds Books Are Gems ↗
- Who funds Child Crisis Center of El Paso Inc ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF EL PASO INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HOSPICE SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds EL PASO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: El Paso Community Foundation · Paso del Norte Community Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Alternative House Inc · Robert E & Evelyn McKee Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · The Klesse Foundation · United Way of El Paso County · Brittingham Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Michael M Peacock Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.