Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michael M Peacock Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$103k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Animals$276kHuman Services$229kHealth$227kFood & Nutrition$89kHousing & Shelter$33kEducation$30kInternational$27kRecreation & Sports$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$31,000
ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE$11,000
THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO$9,000
CAT RESCUE CORP$7,778
PAWSITIVE RESCUERS OF EL PASO$7,530
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$5,000
SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER$5,000
CENTERSTONE OF TENNESSEE$5,000
I'M ALMOST HOME ANIMAL RESCUE$4,000
CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL & FAMILY VIOLENCE$2,530
BOOKS ARE GEMS$2,530
CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TX$2,530
MOBILITY WORLDWIDE SAN ANTONIO$2,530
COLEL CHABAD$2,530
VILLA MARIA$2,530
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Las Trampas: $20k → 9%Rescue Mission Alliance: $5k → 10%LAS TRAMPAS INC: $20k → 9%Futures Explored: $2k → 9%Domestic Violence Solutions: $5k → 14%MEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION: $13k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS (DIABLO REGION): $8k → 9%Meals on Wheels & Senior Outreach Services: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $10k → 16%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TX: $3k → 16%Monument Crisis Center: $9k → 9%CHILDSAFE: $20k → 16%ChildSafe: $20k → 16%CHILDSAFE: $12k → 16%HOSPICE OF THE EAST BAY: $5k → 9%Meals on Wheels: $2k → 16%CHILD CRISIS CENTER OF EL PASO: $15k → 21%CHILD CRISIS CENTER OF EL PASO: $5k → 21%Child Crisis Center of El Paso: $1k → 21%RESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO: $19k → 21%RESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO: $5k → 21%Rescue Mission of El Paso: $300 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$660k · 27 repeat orgs$375k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
55

Total granted

$660k
$335k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+13%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CHILDSAFE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $52k · revenue +497%
  • FO
    Friends of Santa Rosa Foundation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $40k · revenue +6%
  • LT
    Las Trampas School Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $40k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • MC
    MILITARY-CIVILIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +44%
  • CB
    CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER S TX
    one grant, 2021 · $19k
  • CB
    Children's Bereavement Ctr of San Antonio
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
2
Hospice of San Angelo Inc

Hospice of san angelo, inc. (hospice or organization) provides an expert approach to care for those living with a limiting illness in the comfort of their own home and designated nursing homes throughout the twelve counties in the west…

—
3
Rancho Coastal Humane Society

See schedule orancho coastal is dedicated to the rescue and shelter of abandoned companion animals. it encourages adoptions into loving homes and provides educational and community outreach programs designed to enhance the human-animal…

Animals
4
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
5
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
6
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
7
Humane Society of El Paso Inc

The prevention of suffering, neglect, abuse, and cruelty of animalsby providing information, raising public awareness of animal issues,and promoting responsible pet ownership and kindness to all livingthings in west texas.

Animals
8
Hospice of El Paso Inc

The mission of hospice of el paso, inc. is to provide interdisciplinary care designed to meet the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of patients and their families who are coping with terminal illness and resulting losses.

Human Services
9
Pajaro Valley Shelter Services

Pajaro Valley Shelter Services provides families with a path toward self-sufficient futures through short-and longer-term housing and supportive services.

Human Services
10
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
11
Santa Fe Animal Shelter and Humane Society Inc

To support animals, save lives, and spread compassion.

Animals
12
Spca of Texas

The spca of texas is dedicated to providing every animal exceptional care and a loving home.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Bereavement Center of South Texas; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/56
Grantees still filing
36/56
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $153,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVETERANS NON PROFIT: $33,000 · OtherVETERANS NON PROFITTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $22,333 · Other+54 more: $351,480 · Other+54 moreCHILDSAFE: $52,467 · Human ServicesCHILDSAFELas Trampas School Inc: $39,500 · Human ServicesLas Trampas School IncMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $29,000 · Human ServicesMONUMENT CRISIS CENTERRESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO INC: $23,800 · Human ServicesRESCUE MISSION OF EL PAS…MEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION: $23,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO R…Child Crisis Center of El Paso Inc: $20,500 · Human ServicesChild Crisis Center of E…CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $12,530 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CE…+6 more: $21,000 · Human Services+6 moreFriends of Santa Rosa Foundation: $40,000 · HealthFriends of …CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $18,334 · HealthCHRISTUS CH…Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation: $10,000 · HealthSanta Barba…American Heart Association Inc: $10,000 · HealthAmerican He…FAMILY HOUSE INC: $9,500 · HealthFAMILY HOUS…CENTERSTONE OF TENNESSEE INC: $5,000 · HealthCANCER FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA: $5,000 · HealthCONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER: $4,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF EL PASO INC: $18,500 · AnimalsHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $16,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT): $12,533 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $9,333 · AnimalsCAT RESCUE CORP: $7,778 · AnimalsEl Paso Zoological Society: $3,000 · AnimalsEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $25,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $11,500 · Food & NutritionMILITARY-CIVILIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Public BenefitBooks Are Gems: $22,030 · Education
Other$559,813Human Services$221,797Health$102,834Animals$67,644Food & Nutrition$36,500Public Benefit$25,000Education$22,030

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDSAFE: $52,467 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFriends of Santa Rosa Foundation: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLas Trampas School Inc: $39,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVETERANS NON PROFIT: $33,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $29,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMILITARY-CIVILIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO INC: $23,800 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION: $23,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBooks Are Gems: $22,030 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetChild Crisis Center of El Paso Inc: $20,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF EL PASO INC: $18,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $18,334 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $16,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $16,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO: $13,864 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT): $12,533 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $12,530 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOSPICE SAN ANTONIO INC: $11,333 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $9,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $9,333 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL PASO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $8,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCAT RESCUE CORP: $7,778 over 1y, 21% of budgetCENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC: $7,530 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInsights-El Paso Science Center Inc: $5,300 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetRESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTECITO FIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetEAST BAY INTEGRATED CARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAFE & SOUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTERSTONE OF TENNESSEE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRim Country Hospice Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNASHVILLE SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA POLICE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF SANTA BARBARA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FIREFIGHTERS ALLIANCE: $3,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEl Paso Zoological Society: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFUTURES EXPLORED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA RESCUE MISSION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

El Paso Community FoundationTX26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Paso Community Foundation · Paso del Norte Community Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Alternative House Inc · Robert E & Evelyn McKee Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · The Klesse Foundation · United Way of El Paso County · Brittingham Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael M Peacock Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael M Peacock Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael M Peacock’s filings →

    More from the funding graph