· Private foundation
Michael Inganamort Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $6,663 |
| PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY | $4,000 |
| NMC FOUNDATION | $3,660 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,575 |
| FAR HILLS RACE MEETING | $2,050 |
| PATRIOTS PATH COUNCIL | $1,738 |
| CHESTER TWP PBA LOCAL 315 | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| CRAIG G DOKA FDN | $1,500 |
| SSP CCM FOUNDATION | $1,010 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| SADDLE RIVER FIRE DEPARTMENT | $1,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT | $1,000 |
| PP FAMILY PROMIS OF S NEWTON | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IFINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT INC6× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +0%
- SFSCARC FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +23%
- PSPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC2× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- EHENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $3k
- LCLAKELAND CHARITIESone grant, 2021 · $2k
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +125%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
It is the mission of the new jersey firefighters mutual benevolent association to represent, protect, and educate the firefighters, emts, and dispatchers throughout the state of new jersey through representation at the local, state, and…
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
To serve as lifelong guardians and advocates for people with developmental disabilities who cannot acquire needed services independently. (continued on schedule o)we will work with persons with developmental disabilities, their families,…
Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…
The Organization's mission is to support healthcare education, research and patient care programs in the State of New Jersey and for other scientific, charitable, literary and educational purposes.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The organization was established to promote, advance, and improve, financially and otherwise, the welfare, working conditions, and other interests of police and law enforcement officers through out the state of new jersey.
To support the charitable purposes, programs and services of saint peter's university hospital ("the hospital"); a related internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, which provides medically necessary healthcare…
The mutual protection and benefit of all its members.
The organization was established to enhance the relationship between public and private entities and the nj state troopers non commissioned officers association.
The mission of the organization is to facilitate and develop an environment of patient-oriented care that serves the health needs of morristown medical center patients. the organization maintains physicians committed to the excellence of…
The mission is to support morris hospital through financial support and volunteer service. specifically, the auxiliary raises funds through special events, sales, and the gift shop and provides a wide array of volunteer opportunities in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds SCARC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds NEWTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENT CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Troops Direct ↗
- Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
- Who funds ADOPT-A-SOLDIER PLATOON INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Perona Farms Foundation · Hudson Farm Foundation Inc · Brueckner Family Charitable Foundation · John L & Grace P Soldoveri Foundation In · Atlantic Health System Inc Group Return · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Michael Inganamort Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Sparta Ambulance Service Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.