Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michael Inganamort Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$68kReligion$21kHuman Services$21kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kYouth Development$8kInternational$7kPhilanthropy$6kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$600
Median grant
8
States reached
$625k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$6,663
PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY$4,000
NMC FOUNDATION$3,660
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,575
FAR HILLS RACE MEETING$2,050
PATRIOTS PATH COUNCIL$1,738
CRAIG G DOKA FDN$1,500
CHESTER TWP PBA LOCAL 315$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
SSP CCM FOUNDATION$1,010
INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT$1,000
PP FAMILY PROMIS OF S NEWTON$1,000
NORTH STAR CLAY TARGET FOUNDATION$1,000
NMH FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SCARC FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%SCARC FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%SCARC FOUNDATION: $368 → 6%SCARC FOUNDATION: $250 → 6%SCARC FOUNDATION: $250 → 6%SCARC FOUNDATION: $250 → 6%PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY: $4k → 6%SCARC FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%PROJECT SELF SUFFICIENCY: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$134k · 32 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
23

Total granted

$134k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+28%

Still filing today

41%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
HealthPublic BenefitHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +0%
  • SF
    SCARC FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +23%
  • NM
    NEWTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $6k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • EH
    ENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • LC
    LAKELAND CHARITIES
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nj State Firefighters Mutual Benevolent Assoc Inc

It is the mission of the new jersey firefighters mutual benevolent association to represent, protect, and educate the firefighters, emts, and dispatchers throughout the state of new jersey through representation at the local, state, and…

—
2
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
3
Scarc Guardianship Services Inc

To serve as lifelong guardians and advocates for people with developmental disabilities who cannot acquire needed services independently. (continued on schedule o)we will work with persons with developmental disabilities, their families,…

Recreation & Sports
4
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
5
New Jersey Health Foundation Inc

The Organization's mission is to support healthcare education, research and patient care programs in the State of New Jersey and for other scientific, charitable, literary and educational purposes.

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
New Jersey State Policemen's Benevolent Association Inc

The organization was established to promote, advance, and improve, financially and otherwise, the welfare, working conditions, and other interests of police and law enforcement officers through out the state of new jersey.

—
8
Saint Peter's Healthcare System Physician Associates Pc

To support the charitable purposes, programs and services of saint peter's university hospital ("the hospital"); a related internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, which provides medically necessary healthcare…

—
9
New Jersey Superior Officers Law Enforcement Association

The mutual protection and benefit of all its members.

Philanthropy
10
State Troopers Nco Assoc Foundation Inc

The organization was established to enhance the relationship between public and private entities and the nj state troopers non commissioned officers association.

Philanthropy
11
Medical Dental Staff of Morristown Mem Hospital

The mission of the organization is to facilitate and develop an environment of patient-oriented care that serves the health needs of morristown medical center patients. the organization maintains physicians committed to the excellence of…

Health
12
Morris Hospital Auxiliary

The mission is to support morris hospital through financial support and volunteer service. specifically, the auxiliary raises funds through special events, sales, and the gift shop and provides a wide array of volunteer opportunities in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST GABRIEL'S CHURCH: $15,500 · OtherST GABRIEL'S CHURCHSADDLE RIVER POLICE EQUIPMENT FUND: $7,500 · OtherSADDLE RIVER POLICE EQUIPMENT FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $6,663 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN COUNCIL OF YOUNG POLITICAL: $6,500 · OtherAMERICAN COUNCIL OF YOUNG POLITICALBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $6,300 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICANEWTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,700 · Other+66 more: $63,711 · Other+66 moreINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT INC: $37,610 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION…SCARC FOUNDATION INC: $8,468 · Human ServicesPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC: $5,700 · Human ServicesTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $750 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $500 · HealthSPARTA AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $250 · Health+1 more: $200 · HealthPROVIDENT CHARITIES INC: $3,650 · PhilanthropyTroops Direct: $2,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $200 · PhilanthropyTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,050 · Public BenefitADOPT-A-SOLDIER PLATOON INC: $2,000 · Public BenefitGARDEN STATE INITIATIVE INC: $250 · Public BenefitNORTH STAR CLAY TARGET FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsSPARTA TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $200 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$111,874Education$37,610Human Services$14,168Health$6,700Philanthropy$5,850Public Benefit$4,300Recreation & Sports$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT INC: $37,610 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSCARC FOUNDATION INC: $8,468 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNEWTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC: $5,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTroops Direct: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH STAR CLAY TARGET FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget200 CLUB OF SUSSEX COUNTY: $780 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOSPICE OF THE LAKEWAY AREA INC: $255 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPARTA AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPARTA TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSA Shooting Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds SCARC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENT CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADOPT-A-SOLDIER PLATOON INC ↗
  • Who funds Troops Direct ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Perona Farms FoundationNJ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Perona Farms Foundation · Hudson Farm Foundation Inc · Brueckner Family Charitable Foundation · John L & Grace P Soldoveri Foundation In · Atlantic Health System Inc Group Return · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael Inganamort Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael Inganamort Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Sparta Ambulance Service Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michael Inganamort’s filings →

More from the funding graph