Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michael Dunitz Crisis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$93kHealth$76kPublic Safety & Disaster$29kCivil Rights$22kHuman Services$12kEnvironment$9kFood & Nutrition$4kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$262k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN ATTN DONOR SERVICES TEAM$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,000
DIRECT RELIEF$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,000
ACLU$2,000
NAACP LDF$2,000
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$1,000
THE PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION$1,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT$1,000
EARTH JUSTICE$1,000
THE HUNGER PROJECT$1,000
UNICEF$1,000
HEBREW IMMIGRANT AID SOCIETY$1,000
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%mag america: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%MAG AMERICA: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$241k · 28 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
10

Total granted

$241k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+38%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +98%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    8× · 2018–2025 · $18k · revenue +9%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • Feeding America
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +23%
  • COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +203%
  • EW
    EMPOWERED WOMEN INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
2
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
3
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
The Fund for Peace Inc

Building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. a leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the fund for peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing…

International
7
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
8
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
9
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
10
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
11
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
12
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Violence Policy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $13,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODHEBREW IMMIGRANT AID SOCIETY: $12,000 · OtherHEBREW IMMIGRANT AID SOCIETYACLU: $11,000 · OtherACLUWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN ATTN DONOR SERVICES TEAM: $10,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN ATTN DONOR SERVICES TEAMMED SHARE: $9,000 · OtherMED SHAREGLOBAL IMPACT - MOAS: $9,000 · OtherGLOBAL IMPACT - MOASREADING HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER: $8,000 · OtherREADING HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION: $7,000 · OtherNATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITIONFeeding America: $4,000 · Other+11 more: $17,000 · Other+11 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $24,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $16,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFDIRECT RELIEF: $9,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $9,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INCTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $9,000 · InternationalTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECTAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · InternationalTHE SAMBURU PROJECT INC: $3,000 · InternationalSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $3,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $18,000 · Human ServicesAmerican …MAG AMERICA INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesMAG AMERI…MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $9,000 · Civil RightsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $3,000 · HealthPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $8,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $9,000 · Environment
Other$108,000International$78,000Human Services$21,000Civil Rights$19,000Health$12,000Philanthropy$10,000Environment$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $24,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAMBURU PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAG AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIOLENCE POLICY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANDICAP INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds THE SAMBURU PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAG AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds VIOLENCE POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HANDICAP INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael Dunitz Crisis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael Dunitz Crisis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michael Dunitz Crisis’ filings →

More from the funding graph