Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michael D Levin and Joanne Levin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$114k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$218kCivil Rights$183kHealth$111kPhilanthropy$101kHousing & Shelter$95kYouth Development$91kEducation$68kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $70k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Friends Magen David Adom$10,000
Planned Parenthood$10,000
New Israel Fund$10,000
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention$10,000
Elem Youth in Distress Israel$10,000
Step Up On Second$10,000
Philadelphia Youth Basketball$10,000
Hand in Hand$5,000
Ohana One Intl Surgical Aid$5,000
PS Science$5,000
Southern Poverty Law Ctr$5,000
Holocaust Museum LA$2,500
Museum of Tolerance$2,500
Jewish Federation$2,500
Jewish Federation Women's Campaign$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $166k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CORAZON DE VIDA: $3k → 10%EMMAS TORCH: $5k → 20%CORAZON DE VIDA: $3k → 10%EMMAS TORCH: $3k → 20%CORAZON DE VIDA: $3k → 10%EMMAS TORCH: $3k → 20%Emmas Torch: $3k → 20%EMMAS TORCH: $3k → 20%NARAL PRO CHOISE AMERICA: $1k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%NARAL PRO CHOISE AMERICA: $1k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $3k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $10k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $3k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $10k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $3k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $10k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $3k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $10k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $3k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $5k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $5k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $3k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $5k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $3k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $1k → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $500 → 14%Step Up On Second: $10k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $5k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $5k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $5k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $5k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $5k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $5k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $5k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $5k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $3k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $3k → 14%ONE VOICE: $1k → 14%ONE VOICE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
PA
CA
UT
CO
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$878k · 36 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against -56% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
4

Total granted

$878k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
-56%

Still filing today

64%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureInternationalEducationCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +10%
  • UI
    UNITED IN HARMONY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +176%
  • SU
    STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +400%

Funded once

  • UJ
    UCLA JONSSON COMPREHENSIVE CANCER
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION LA
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • CN
    CAMINO NUEVO ACADEMY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
2
Alliance for Safety and Justice

Just safe's mission is to educate the public about the needs of communities most impacted by crime, violence, and incarceration; and promote new safety solutions through community-building, leadership development, grassroots mobilization,…

Crime & Legal
3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
4
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
5
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
6
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
7
The Anti-Recidivism Coalition

The anti-recidivism coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. to ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network,…

Crime & Legal
8
Public Counsel

Public counsel is a nonprofit public interest law firm dedicated to advancing civil rights and racial and economic justice, as well as to amplifying the power of our clients through comprehensive legal advocacy. (see sch o for…

Crime & Legal
9
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
10
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
Anti-Defamation League

Anti-defamation league (the "league") is a leading anti-hate organization that was founded in 1913 in response to an escalating climate of antisemitism and bigotry. (continued in sch. o)its timeless mission is to stop the defamation of the…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild Inc; the most unlike its peers is CHORDS2CURE Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $95,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODJEWISH FEDERATION: $92,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONACLU FOUNDATION: $65,000 · OtherACLU FOUNDATIONAMERICAN FRIENDS MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $35,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS MAGEN DAVID ADOMAM FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $20,000 · OtherEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $15,500 · Other+23 more: $128,000 · Other+23 moreUNITED IN HARMONY: $57,500 · Human ServicesUNITED IN HARMONYSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesSTEP UP ON SECOND …DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S C…EMMA'S TORCH LTD: $15,000 · Human ServicesEMMA'S TORCH LTDUNION RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSI…CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Human Services+5 more: $11,000 · Human Services+5 moreNEW ISRAEL FUND: $85,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDELEM YOUTH IN DISTRESS INC: $40,000 · InternationalELEM YOUTH IN DIST…OHANA ONE INTL SURGICAL AID: $30,000 · InternationalOHANA ONE INTL SUR…HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $10,000 · InternationalHAND IN HAND AMERI…SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $80,000 · Crime & LegalPS Science: $35,000 · EducationCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES: $30,000 · Education+1 more: $1,800 · EducationPHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $11,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$451,000Human Services$166,000International$165,000Crime & Legal$80,000Education$66,800Recreation & Sports$40,000Arts & Culture$39,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $85,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $80,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED IN HARMONY: $57,500 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetELEM YOUTH IN DISTRESS INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetPS Science: $35,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetOHANA ONE INTL SURGICAL AID: $30,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $15,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEMMA'S TORCH LTD: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHORDS2CURE CORPORATION: $10,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOne Voice: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATH: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ocean Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for California Traditional Arts: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED IN HARMONY ↗
  • Who funds STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds ELEM YOUTH IN DISTRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds PS Science ↗
  • Who funds OHANA ONE INTL SURGICAL AID ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EMMA'S TORCH LTD ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CHORDS2CURE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
  • Who funds CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA ↗
  • Who funds One Voice ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA19.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · M B Seretean Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Rose Hills Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael D Levin and Joanne Levin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael D Levin and Joanne Levin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael D Levin and Joanne Levin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph