Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michael and Karen Schley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$286k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$640kEducation$575kInternational$156kEmployment$31kReligion$31kYouth Development$5kFood & Nutrition$3kCommunity Improvement$1k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $44k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $238k
$14,400
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NC JUSTICE CENTER$102,500
KONGONI NETWORK COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATION$80,000
NORTH RALEIGH MINISTRIES INC$55,000
MILLBROOK MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL PTSA$14,400
HOPE COLLEGE$10,000
THE IFMA FOUNDATION$10,000
FAITH MINISTRY$10,000
SAINT ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 74% of grant dollars ($1.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 26% that went abroad ($370k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $322k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%STAFF OF HOPE: $63k → 11%Staff of Hope: $25k → 11%STAFF OF HOPE: $20k → 11%Staff of Hope: $9k → 8%NC JUSTICE CENTER: $103k → 8%Staff of Hope: $25k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONALS: $26k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONALS: $25k → 8%North Carolina Society of Hispanic Professionals: $25k → 8%NC SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONALS: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 26% of all-years giving ($370k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Kenya$370k · 5 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 12 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$1.2M
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-3%

Still filing today

50%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTH RALEIGH MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $165k · revenue +150%
  • HC
    HOPE COLLEGE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +25%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KENYA INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $10k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • Loaves and Fishes Ministry Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -3%
  • HH
    HELPING HAND MISSION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • A PLACE AT THE TABLEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Academy of Charlotte Inc

Christ-centered, college preparatory, academic program.

Education
2
Hope Venture

The hope venture exists to bring hope and dignity to the most disadvantaged people through education and health projects.

International
3
North Country Mission of Hope

The mission is committed to fostering hope and empowering relationships with people of nicaragua through sustainable programs in education, health care, community and ecological development, and ecological sustainability, and by supporting…

Religion
4
Norfolk Christian Schools

It is the mission of norfolk christian schools to equip students spiritually, intellectually, and physically to love god and to serve him as christ's ambassadors in the world.

Education
5
Norfolk Collegiate School

To educate a diverse body of students to thrive in a college setting and beyond.

Education
6
Northpoint College

Northpoint college seeks to make a demonstrably positive impact on the faith communities it serves by facilitating an educational experience consistent with the mission and evidenced by low graduate indebtedness, the quality and…

—
7
Africa New Hope Empowerment Inc

At anehope, our mission is to facilitate bright children from refugee and less privileged communities to access quality education. we are driven by a deep desire to empower these students, transform their lives, and create positive change…

Religion
8
North Carolina a Philip Randolph Educational Fund

To bring about civic betterment and social improvements.

Human Services
9
School of Hope Foundation

School of hope foundation was formed to conduct fundraising activities to support st. aloysius gonzaga high school located in nairobi serving kids from the kibera slum.

International
10
Education for Hope
Education
11
Possibilities Africa

To mobilize and equip christians to become agents of spiritual and socio-economic transformation in africa.

International
12
Apt Ministries

To train pastors/leaders in africa who have little or no formal training and resources. teach them how to study and prepare bible-based messages using the thompson chain reference study bible and to provide bible to trained pastors/leaders.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Raleigh Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Kenya Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $326,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $289,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKONGONI NETWORK COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATION: $80,000 · OtherKONGONI NETWORK COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATIONMILLBROOK MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL PTSA: $77,400 · OtherMILLBROOK MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL PTSASAINT ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $43,300 · OtherIFMA FOUNDATION: $31,000 · OtherFAITH MINISTRY: $30,500 · Other+3 more: $6,000 · OtherSTAFF OF HOPE: $141,848 · Human ServicesSTAFF OF HOPENORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $102,500 · Human ServicesNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CE…NORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONALS INCORPORATED: $77,715 · Human ServicesNORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY OF…NORTH RALEIGH MINISTRIES INC: $165,000 · ReligionNORTH RALEIG…HOPE COLLEGE: $50,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KENYA INC: $10,000 · EducationLoaves and Fishes Ministry Inc: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentA PLACE AT THE TABLE: $2,500 · Food & NutritionPOLARIS PROJECT: $2,000 · International
Other$883,700Human Services$322,063Religion$165,000Education$60,000Youth Development$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,500International$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH RALEIGH MINISTRIES INC: $165,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetSTAFF OF HOPE: $141,848 over 4y, 38% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $102,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONALS INCORPORATED: $77,715 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIFMA FOUNDATION: $31,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KENYA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetA PLACE AT THE TABLE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH RALEIGH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds STAFF OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONALS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds IFMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KENYA INC ↗
  • Who funds Loaves and Fishes Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE AT THE TABLE ↗
  • Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC15.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael and Karen Schley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael and Karen Schley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Michael and Karen Schley Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Michael and Karen Schley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael and Karen Schley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph