· Private foundation
Michael and Karen Schley Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $4k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $44k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $238k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NC JUSTICE CENTER | $102,500 |
| KONGONI NETWORK COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATION | $80,000 |
| NORTH RALEIGH MINISTRIES INC | $55,000 |
| MILLBROOK MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL PTSA | $14,400 |
| THE IFMA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HOPE COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| FAITH MINISTRY | $10,000 |
| SAINT ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 74% of grant dollars ($1.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 26% that went abroad ($370k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $322k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Beyond the US — 26% of all-years giving ($370k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
NORTH RALEIGH MINISTRIES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $165k · revenue +150%- HCHOPE COLLEGE5× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +25%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KENYA INC2× · 2020–2022 · $10k · revenue +76%
Funded once
Loaves and Fishes Ministry Incone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -3%- HHHELPING HAND MISSIONone grant, 2020 · $3k
A PLACE AT THE TABLEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +63%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christ-centered, college preparatory, academic program.
The hope venture exists to bring hope and dignity to the most disadvantaged people through education and health projects.
The mission is committed to fostering hope and empowering relationships with people of nicaragua through sustainable programs in education, health care, community and ecological development, and ecological sustainability, and by supporting…
It is the mission of norfolk christian schools to equip students spiritually, intellectually, and physically to love god and to serve him as christ's ambassadors in the world.
To educate a diverse body of students to thrive in a college setting and beyond.
Northpoint college seeks to make a demonstrably positive impact on the faith communities it serves by facilitating an educational experience consistent with the mission and evidenced by low graduate indebtedness, the quality and…
At anehope, our mission is to facilitate bright children from refugee and less privileged communities to access quality education. we are driven by a deep desire to empower these students, transform their lives, and create positive change…
To bring about civic betterment and social improvements.
School of hope foundation was formed to conduct fundraising activities to support st. aloysius gonzaga high school located in nairobi serving kids from the kibera slum.
To mobilize and equip christians to become agents of spiritual and socio-economic transformation in africa.
To train pastors/leaders in africa who have little or no formal training and resources. teach them how to study and prepare bible-based messages using the thompson chain reference study bible and to provide bible to trained pastors/leaders.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Raleigh Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Kenya Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTH RALEIGH MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds STAFF OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONALS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds IFMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KENYA INC ↗
- Who funds Loaves and Fishes Ministry Inc ↗
- Who funds A PLACE AT THE TABLE ↗
- Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Michael and Karen Schley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Michael and Karen Schley Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Michael and Karen Schley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.