· Private foundation
Micah 68 Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $140k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST DUNSTAN ACADEMY | $50,000 |
| WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY | $50,000 |
| CHURCH OF THE INCARNATION | $30,000 |
| CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION - CHARLOTTESVILLE | $25,000 |
| WORD OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL | $20,000 |
| HOPE CHURCH | $16,000 |
| CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION - WASHINGTON DC | $15,000 |
| THE NETWORK | $12,000 |
| THE WORLD NEWS GROUP | $12,000 |
| SERVANT'S HEART MINISTRY | $10,000 |
| CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS | $8,000 |
| CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN STUDIES AT UVA | $5,000 |
| CORNERSTONE SUMMIT CHURCH | $5,000 |
| SPOOKSTOCK FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $157k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SDST DUNSTAN'S ACADEMY3× · 2021–2024 · $568k · revenue +766% · 94% of their budget
- GWGod's World Publications Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $87k · revenue +52%
- TCTHE COVENANT SCHOOL INC2× · 2020–2021 · $60k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- COCHURCH OF THE RESSURECTIONone grant, 2020 · $50k
- COCHURCH OF THE LAMBone grant, 2022 · $40k
- WOWORLD OF LIFE INTERNATIONALone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.
To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…
Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.
Provides seminary, under-graduate, graduate, doctoral, and other continuing education programs
New york theological seminary is a diverse and inclusive community of learning grounded in biblical witness and christian tradition, with a historic urban focus. the seminary prepares women and men for faith-based ministries in the city…
Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Regents' mission is to provide a classical and christian education, founded upon and informed by a biblical worldview, that equips our students to know, love, and practice that which is true, good, and the beautiful and challenges them to…
Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.
Ohio christian university (ocu) is committed to offering a complete education that develops students intellectually, professionally, and spiritually. (continued on schedule o)ocu offers degree programs designed to equip students to become…
Northpoint college seeks to make a demonstrably positive impact on the faith communities it serves by facilitating an educational experience consistent with the mission and evidenced by low graduate indebtedness, the quality and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's World Publications Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Neighbors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST DUNSTAN'S ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds God's World Publications Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COVENANT SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds REGENT COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORD OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CAMPS OF PITTSBURGH INC ↗
- Who funds SERVANTS HEART MINISTRY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds International Neighbors Inc ↗
- Who funds UGANDA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds SPOOKSTOCK FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Micah 68 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Servants Heart Ministry Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Micah 68 Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Micah 68 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.