Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mfa Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$768k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$639kHealth$231kFood & Nutrition$83kPhilanthropy$45kScience & Tech$15kYouth Development$10kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $221,700, the rows itemized in this filing. The $767,700 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $546,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Missouri - Mental Health$125,000
Heart of Missouri United Way$15,000
Missouri Colleges Fund$10,000
ALOT Foundation$10,000
Missouri FFA Associaion$10,000
Central Missouri Food Bank$10,000
Drury University$5,000
Missouri 4-H Foundation$5,000
Stephens College$5,000
Missouri 4-H Foundation (Robotics)$5,000
Agriculture Future of America$3,000
College of the Ozarks$2,500
Missouri Valley College$2,500
Missouri Young Farmers Association$2,500
University of Missouri - Bill Streeter Scholarship$2,100
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$938k · 22 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
3

Total granted

$938k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-20%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • M4
    MISSOURI 4-H FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +8%
  • DU
    Drury University
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +16%
  • SC
    STEPHENS COLLEGE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • EF
    EAGLE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -95%
  • MF
    Missouri Farm Bureau Federation
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -20%
  • M4
    Missouri 4-H Foundation (Robotics) (2 of 5)
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
2
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
3
Missouri Farm Bureau Foundation for Agriculture

To assist in providing agricultural related education to all persons and developing agricultural leaders for the future.

Youth Development
4
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
5
Mid-America Christian University Inc

Mid-america christian university prepares students through a wesleyan perspective to create, collaborate, and innovate to solve local and global problems for the glory of god through jesus christ and the good of society.

—
6
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
7
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
8
Midwest University

Christian institution of higher learning dedicated to the exploration, discernment, sustentation, and dissemination of god's truth. midwest is committed to excellence in education encouraging students to comprehensively consider god's word…

Education
9
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
10
Dunwoody College of Technology

Dunwoody college changes lives by building opportunities for graduates to have successful careers, to develop into leaders and entrepreneurs, and to engage in "the better performance of life's duties." quote is from the last will and…

Education
11
Lincoln University Aka Lincoln College

Lincoln college uniquely empowers students to realize their full potential

Education
12
Columbia College

Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri 4-H Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Eagle Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Missouri - MFA Chair: $375,000 · OtherUniversity of Missouri - MFA ChairUniversity of Missouri - Mental Health: $225,000 · OtherUniversity of Missouri - Mental HealthHEART OF MISSOURI UNITED WAY INC: $45,000 · OtherHEART OF MISSOURI UNITED WAY INCMissouri FFA Associaion: $36,200 · Other+13 more: $124,300 · Other+13 moreMISSOURI COLLEGES FUND INC: $51,000 · EducationMISSOURI CO…Drury University: $20,000 · EducationDrury Unive…STEPHENS COLLEGE: $20,000 · EducationSTEPHENS CO…MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationMISSOURI VA…COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $10,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF …EAGLE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyEAGLE FOUN…THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $19,000 · Food & NutritionAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $6,000 · Youth Development
Other$805,500Education$111,000Philanthropy$100,000Food & Nutrition$19,000Youth Development$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEAGLE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetMISSOURI COLLEGES FUND INC: $51,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetHEART OF MISSOURI UNITED WAY INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMISSOURI 4-H FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetDrury University: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHENS COLLEGE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMissouri Farm Bureau Federation: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWoodhaven Learning Center d/b/a Woodhaven: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EAGLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI COLLEGES FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF MISSOURI UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI 4-H FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Drury University ↗
  • Who funds STEPHENS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds Missouri Farm Bureau Federation ↗
  • Who funds Woodhaven Learning Center d/b/a Woodhaven ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orscheln Industries Foundation IncMO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Veterans United Foundation · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · Truman Heartland Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mfa Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mfa Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.1M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mfa’s filings →

More from the funding graph