· Private foundation
Metro Health Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LINC UP NONPROFIT HOUSING CORP | $50,000 |
| FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY | $50,000 |
| MICHIGAN PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION | $50,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGES OF MICHIGAN | $50,000 |
| MICHIGAN ADVOCACY PROGRAM | $30,000 |
| WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY | $14,718 |
| CAMP FIRE SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN | $10,000 |
| BALDWIN CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| FREE CLINICS OF MICHIGAN | $10,000 |
| COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS | $2,350 |
| STREET OUTREACH TEAMS | $2,116 |
| Individual grant recipient | $830 |
| MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY | $250 |
| MALTA DENTAL AND MEDICAL CENTER | $220 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 17% of Metro Health Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 84% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $237k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC3× · 2020–2023 · $76k · revenue +79%
RUTH ELLIS CENTER3× · 2021–2023 · $76k · revenue +51%- MAMichigan Advocacy Program3× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +93%
Funded once
- GCGILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROITone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +22%
- HEHEALTH EMERGENCY LIFELINE PROGRAMSgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +114%
- CCCovenant Community Care Incone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.
Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.
The mission of the Center for Family Health is opening the door to health care for all.
To provide high quality health care to individuals and community groups in Saginaw, Bay, and other nearby counties. Services are provided without regard to race, beliefs or ability to pay.
The mission of the michigan health council is to facilitate the education, recruitment and retention of a diverse healthcare workforce by maximizing technology and partnerships.
To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.
The organization's mission is to support community-based, stakeholder driven training for care teams including physicians, care managers, care coordinators, medical assistants and behavioral health specialists; facilitate training and…
To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…
To provide quality medical and dental primary care services to persons of all ages in northwest michigan regardless of ability to pay.
Creating healthy communities - together
Creating healthy communities - together
Muskegon family care is a federally qualified health center with medical and dental clinics reaching out to uninsured and underinsured patients in muskegon county.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Michigan Health Endowment Fund and the most unlike its peers is National Association of Social Workers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC ↗
- Who funds RUTH ELLIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Michigan Advocacy Program ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FERNCARE FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds GILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT ↗
- Who funds HEALTH EMERGENCY LIFELINE PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds Covenant Community Care Inc ↗
- Who funds Presbyterian Villages of Michigan ↗
- Who funds Health Unit on Davison Avenue ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LINC UP NONPROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN HEALTH ENDOWMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds MyCare Health Center ↗
- Who funds MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds WAYNE CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE ACCESS PROGR AM INC ↗
- Who funds DAMES AND KNIGHTS OF THE ORDER OF MALTA MEDICAL AND DENTAL CLINIC OF ↗
- Who funds WORLD MEDICAL RELIEF INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Oakland Integrated Healthcare Network ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds C-ASSIST ↗
- Who funds ALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS ↗
- Who funds PONTIAC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH & TRANSFORMATION ↗
- Who funds BRIDGING COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds THE BALDWIN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES CENTER INC & AFFILIATE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · The Kresge Foundation · The Jewish Fund · Dmc Foundation · McGregor Fund · The Carls Foundation · Dte Energy Foundation · Delta Dental Fund · WK Kellogg Foundation · Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Metro Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Metro Health Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Metro Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.