Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Dmc Foundation

The purpose of the foundation is to operate exclusively for charitable, scientific and educational purposes including to promote the welfare of the general public through the support of research, education, and community benefit activities such as the encouragement and facilitation of the provision of medical, health care, and disease…

$2.5M
Granted FY2023
20
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2023.

Health$4.6MEducation$3.5MHuman Services$270kPublic Safety & Disaster$176kHousing & Shelter$145kEmployment$120kInternational$65kCommunity Improvement$50k
02FY2023 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$75,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$1,090,103
HEALTH EMERGENCY LIFELINE PROGRAMS$100,000
NEW DETROIT INC$100,000
VISION TO LEARN$100,000
MHA KEYSTONE CENTER$99,800
ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL$85,000
DETROIT INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION$80,604
DETROIT PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION$76,180
AVALON HEALING CENTER$75,000
CENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC$75,000
MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION FOR INFANT MENTAL HEALTH$75,000
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM$75,000
GRANDMONT ROSEDALE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$75,000
ALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS$70,000
VHS HURON VALLEY-SINAI HOSPITAL INC$65,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $452k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $40k → 8%MICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK: $75k → 16%ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL: $85k → 21%ZAMAN INTERNATIONAL: $65k → 21%HANNAN CENTER: $25k → 21%BLACK MOTHERS BREASTFEEDING ASSOCIATION: $37k → 21%DETROIT RECOVERY PROJECT INC: $75k → 21%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $50k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Dmc Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Dmc Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.0M · 9 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
28

Total granted

$6.0M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+35%

Still filing today

78%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $861k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    4× · 2020–2023 · $325k · revenue +48%
  • HE
    HEALTH EMERGENCY LIFELINE PROGRAMS
    2× · 2021–2023 · $175k · revenue +151%
  • VISION TO LEARN
    2× · 2021–2023 · $175k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • WB
    WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +4%
  • BA
    BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $127k · revenue +23%
  • CO
    CITY OF DEARBORN
    one grant, 2022 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Greater Detroit Health Transition Company

Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…

—
2
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
3
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
4
Detroit Healthcare for the Homeless

To improve the health status of the individuals and the communities we serv by providing access to high quality, respectful and efficient health care services. advantage health centers will also be a catalyst for access to health care and…

—
5
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
6
Detroit Community Health Connection

Dchc is a primary care organization committed to providing accessible, affordable and quality service to all members of the communities we serve.

—
7
Henry Ford Macomb Hospital Corporation

Henry ford health macomb hospital (hfmh) is an affiliate of henry ford health system dba henry ford health ("hf health") serving the northeastern metropolitan detroit michigan communities. as an integrated component of one of the nation's…

Health
8
Mclaren Greater Lansing

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
9
Center for Family Health

The mission of the Center for Family Health is opening the door to health care for all.

Health
10
Mymichigan Medical Group

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
11
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
12
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Detroit Central City Cmh Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dr Gary Burnstein Community Health Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDetroit Community Developme…Youth and Adult Skills Trai…Community Development Organ…Education Support Organizat…Arab & Interfaith Community…Diverse Social ServicesFamily Philanthropic Founda…Jewish Community ServicesOakland County Community Se…Healthcare Delivery Organiz…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr12%20%35–55yr13%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr12%9%35–55yr13%62%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/51
the rest of the field
17%
2,883/16,557

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
34/43
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY — $4,157,999 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYCITY OF DETROIT — $465,886 · OtherCITY OF DETROIT+15 more — $1,028,464 · Other+15 moreHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $325,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMDETROIT INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $311,069 · HealthDETROIT INTERNATIONAL RESEA…HEALTH EMERGENCY LIFELINE PROGRAMS — $175,000 · HealthHEALTH EMERGENCY LIFELINE P…VISION TO LEARN — $175,000 · HealthVISION TO LEARNWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL — $150,000 · HealthWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITALBARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE — $127,000 · HealthBARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER…DR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC — $120,000 · HealthDR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY…American Heart Association Inc — $100,000 · HealthMHA KEYSTONE CENTER DBA MHA PATIENT SAFETY ORGANIZATION — $99,800 · HealthCovenant Community Care Inc — $78,100 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES CENTER INC & AFFILIATE — $75,000 · HealthOakland Integrated Healthcare Network — $75,000 · HealthPACE SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN F/K/A CENTER FOR SENIOR INDEPENDENCE — $75,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $75,000 · HealthAVALON HEALING CENTER — $75,000 · Health+3 more — $157,879 · Health+3 moreZAMAN INTERNATIONAL — $150,000 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK — $75,000 · Human ServicesDETROIT RECOVERY PROJECT — $75,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $50,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT — $40,000 · Human ServicesBLACK MOTHERS BREASTFEEDING ASSOCIATION — $37,000 · Human ServicesHANNAN CENTER — $25,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN — $150,000 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FUND — $63,000 · PhilanthropyGRANDMONT ROSEDALE DEVELOPMENT CORP — $75,000 · Housing & ShelterALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS — $70,000 · Housing & ShelterSAY DETROIT — $28,000 · Housing & ShelterGILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT — $85,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION — $76,180 · EducationDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Education
Other$5,652,349Health$2,193,848Human Services$452,000Philanthropy$213,000Housing & Shelter$173,000Arts & Culture$160,000Education$126,180

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $325,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $311,069 over 4y, 49% of budgetHEALTH EMERGENCY LIFELINE PROGRAMS — $175,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetVISION TO LEARN — $175,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetZAMAN INTERNATIONAL — $150,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN — $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE — $127,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC — $120,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetNEW DETROIT INC — $100,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMHA KEYSTONE CENTER DBA MHA PATIENT SAFETY ORGANIZATION — $99,800 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT — $85,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetRUTH ELLIS CENTER — $80,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCovenant Community Care Inc — $78,100 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION — $76,180 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetVISTA MARIA — $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES CENTER INC & AFFILIATE — $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOakland Integrated Healthcare Network — $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPACE SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN F/K/A CENTER FOR SENIOR INDEPENDENCE — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC — $75,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetMICHIGAN ASSN INFANT MENTAL HEALTH — $75,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetDETROIT2NEPAL FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN BREASTFEEDING NETWORK — $75,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetGRANDMONT ROSEDALE DEVELOPMENT CORP — $75,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAVALON HEALING CENTER — $75,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDETROIT RECOVERY PROJECT — $75,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS — $70,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $63,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN — $62,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetCHALDEAN AMERICAN LADIES OF CHARITY — $50,464 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHOPE VILLAGE REVITALIZATION — $50,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDETROIT CENTRAL CITY CMH INC — $45,879 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT — $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBLACK MOTHERS BREASTFEEDING ASSOCIATION — $37,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetSAY DETROIT — $28,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHANNAN CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetSER METRO DETROIT JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …United Way for Southe…Michigan Health Endow…The Jewish FundDte Energy FoundationMetro Health Foundati…Ethel and James Flinn…The Kresge FoundationThe Carls FoundationThe Skillman Foundati…Ford PhilanthropyMcGregor Fund
Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI54.8× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · The Jewish Fund · Dte Energy Foundation · Metro Health Foundation · Ethel and James Flinn Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · The Carls Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · McGregor Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dmc Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines