Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Medi-Rec Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$29k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$170kHealth$18kReligion$3kRecreation & Sports$3kHuman Services$1kArts & Culture$1kFood & Nutrition$950Public Safety & Disaster$750Other$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$300
Median grant
6
States reached
$267k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$22,247
MOUNT ST MICHAEL ACADEMY$5,000
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$300
SPECIAL OLYMPICS NC$300
SAINT ANNE'S SHRINE$300
CARLOS BELTRAN BASEBALL ACADEMY$300
NEW CANAAN LIBRARY$200
MEALS ON WHEELS$150
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $300 → 7%FORDHAM UNIVERSITY: $15k → 17%MOUNT ST MICHAEL ACADEMY: $5k → 28%ALS ASSOCIATION NORTH CAROLINA CHAP: $10k → 8%NOVANT HEALTH PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL: $300 → 10%BEAVERTAIL LIGHTHOUSE MUSEUM ASS: $1k → 7%WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOC: $500 → 12%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $250 → 14%SAINT ANNE'S SHRINE: $300 → 9%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $300 → 7%BRIDGES TO COMMUNITY: $500 → 9%MOUNT ST MICHAEL ACADEMY: $5k → 28%ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL: $200 → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200 → 8%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $300 → 10%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $250 → 14%SAINT ANNE'S SHRINE: $300 → 9%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $300 → 7%MOUNT ST MICHAEL ACADEMY: $5k → 28%CAROLINA BREAST FRIENDS INC: $300 → 10%SAINT ANNE'S SHRINE: $300 → 9%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $300 → 7%MOUNT ST MICHAEL ACADEMY: $5k → 28%NOVANT HEALTH PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL: $300 → 10%SAINT ANNE'S SHRINE: $300 → 9%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $300 → 7%MOUNT ST MICHAEL ACADEMY: $5k → 28%NEW CANAAN LIBRARY: $250 → 9%CAROLINA BREAST FRIENDS INC: $300 → 10%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $200 → 7%MOUNT ST MICHAEL ACADEMY: $5k → 28%NEW CANAAN LIBRARY: $250 → 9%ACTIVATE GOOD: $200 → 8%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $300 → 10%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $200 → 7%MOUNT ST MICHAEL ACADEMY: $5k → 28%NEW CANAAN LIBRARY: $250 → 9%MOUNT ST MICHAEL ACADEMY: $5k → 28%NEW CANAAN YMCA: $250 → 9%NEW CANAAN LIBRARY: $250 → 9%NEW CANAAN LIBRARY: $250 → 9%NEW CANAAN LIBRARY: $200 → 9%NEW CANAAN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP: $200 → 9%NEW CANAAN LIBRARY: $200 → 9%THE COVENT OF ST BRIGITTA: $500 → 9%BENNETT CANCER CENTER: $250 → 9%BENNETT CANCER CENTER: $250 → 9%NEW COVENANT CENTER: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
OH
CT
RI
CO
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$184k · 21 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
23

Total granted

$184k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+20%

Still filing today

57%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    Fordham University
    7× · 2017–2024 · $128k · revenue +47%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +132%
  • TN
    THE NEW CANAAN LIBRARY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • AU
    ALS UNITED NORTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -44%
  • BL
    BEAVERTAIL LIGHTHOUSE MUSEUM ASS
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • TW
    THE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
The N 1 Collaborative Inc

To make individualized medicines routinely and rapidly accessible to rare disease patients worldwide.

Health
8
Nuvance Health Medical Practice Ct Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

9
American Society for Nutrition Inc

The american society for nutrition, inc. (asn) was established to advance health around the world through evidence based nutrition. this is accomplished through innovative programs and services designed to advance knowledge, create and…

Food & Nutrition
10
National Association of Corporate Directors New England Chapter Inc

The organization promotes high professional standards and provides governance education to boards of directors and senior corporate management.

Philanthropy
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New Canaan Community Young Men's Christian Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports Booster Organi…Community FoundationsFood Pantries & AssistancePublic Library SupportHomeless Services & ShelterVolunteer Fire DepartmentsYmca Community CentersCommunity Health CentersCancer Support OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%1%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr16%92%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Fordham University — $128,214 · EducationFordham University+2 more — $2,250 · EducationMOUNT ST MICHAEL ACADEMY — $40,000 · OtherMOUNT ST MICHAEL ACADEMY+25 more — $10,375 · Other+25 moreALS UNITED NORTH CAROLINA — $10,000 · HealthALS UNITE…MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $2,500 · HealthMUSCULAR …Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $2,050 · HealthDana-Farb…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $800 · HealthCarolina Breast Friends Inc — $600 · Health+2 more — $825 · HealthTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION — $500 · Recreation & SportsCARLOS BELTRAN BASEBALL ACADEMY INC — $300 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $25 · Recreation & SportsINTEGRO FOUNDATION INC — $500 · Human ServicesBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC — $150 · Human ServicesAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $400 · InternationalA PLACE AT THE TABLE — $200 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $100 · Food & NutritionTHE COMMUNITY FUND OF DARIEN — $100 · Philanthropy
Education$130,464Other$50,375Health$16,775Recreation & Sports$825Human Services$650International$400Food & Nutrition$300Philanthropy$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFordham University — $128,214 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALS UNITED NORTH CAROLINA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $2,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW CANAAN LIBRARY INC — $1,850 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC — $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCarolina Breast Friends Inc — $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTEGRO FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $475 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetACTIVATE GOOD INC — $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSPIRICA INC — $350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARLOS BELTRAN BASEBALL ACADEMY INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW CANAAN COMMUNITY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW CANAAN EMS INC — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA PLACE AT THE TABLE — $200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FUND OF DARIEN — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hobbs Family Charitable TrustCT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hobbs Family Charitable Trust · Syd & Jan M Silverman Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Duke Energy Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Medi-Rec Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc42% of income from government
  • Inspirica Inc30% of income from government
  • The Community Fund of Darien9% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph