Skip to content

· Private foundation

Meah Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$190k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$470kEducation$270kInternational$142kReligion$76kCivil Rights$69kArts & Culture$65kEnvironment$20kPhilanthropy$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $190k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - CLEAR LAKE$190,000
ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF GREATER HOUSTON$10,300
INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR ROHINGYA$6,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL$3,000
JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE$2,000
CODEPINK$1,650
GLOBAL CITIZENS FOR HUMANITY$1,500
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INDIAN MUSLIM RELIEF CHARITIES: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
PA
CA
VA
AZ
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 25 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
16

Total granted

$1.0M
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+21%

Still filing today

48%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROHINGYA CULTURE CENTER
    2× · 2021–2023 · $23k · revenue +15%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $18k · revenue +102%
  • UP
    UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue ×21

Funded once

  • V
    Various
    one grant, 2024 · $26k
  • TU
    the university of houston clear lak
    one grant, 2021 · $26k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
3
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
6
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
7
Partnersglobal

Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.

International
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment
10
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
11
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
12
The International Refugee Rights Initiative

To enhance the protection of rights of the displaced worldwide by the provision of advice and assistance on the application of international law, the conducting of research on the interpretation and application of international law and the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Palestinian Appeal Inc; the most unlike its peers is Houston Public Media Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - CLEAR LAKE: $683,643 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - CLEAR LAKEISLAMIC SOCIETY OF GREATER HOUSTON: $75,800 · OtherISLAMIC SOCIETY OF GREATER HOUSTON+27 more: $236,038 · Other+27 moreCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $63,250 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Brazoria County: $12,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC: $17,500 · InternationalA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $11,000 · InternationalUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $10,000 · InternationalISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $10,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 · International+2 more: $1,495 · InternationalROHINGYA CULTURE CENTER: $23,000 · Arts & CultureHouston Public Media Foundation: $7,500 · Arts & CultureBRAZOSPORT COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $21,000 · EducationCODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE: $1,650 · EducationAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$995,481Philanthropy$75,250International$55,995Arts & Culture$30,500Education$22,650Civil Rights$18,000Crime & Legal$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $63,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROHINGYA CULTURE CENTER: $23,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetBRAZOSPORT COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Brazoria County: $12,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $11,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENT ERIE: $8,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetHouston Public Media Foundation: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE: $1,650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIndian Muslim Relief and Charities: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Borgen Project: $495 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ROHINGYA CULTURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOSPORT COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Brazoria County ↗
  • Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds UNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENT ERIE ↗
  • Who funds Houston Public Media Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Indian Muslim Relief and Charities ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Meah Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Meah Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Meah Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph