Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

McJunkin Family Foundation Truist Foundations and Endowment Spec Pract Tr

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18k
Granted FY2022
14
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$2k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

90% of McJunkin Family Foundation Truist Foundations and Endowment Spec Pract Tr’s FY2023 grant dollars went to The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year McJunkin Family Foundation Truist Foundations and Endowment Spec Pract Tr named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $18k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
18
6
19
8
20
8
21
7
22
9
23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182023.

Philanthropy$315kFood & Nutrition$24kHuman Services$17kInternational$11kEducation$8kHealth$2kAnimals$500Other$95k
02FY2022 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM$2,000
MANNA MEAL$2,000
SALVATION ARMY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$2,000
MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK$1,500
WV HEALTH RIGHT$1,500
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA$1,500
GKVF-ELEVATORS PROGRAM$1,000
CAMC FOUNDATION - ZIEBOLD FUND$1,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,000
UNITED WAY OF WV$1,000
WV YOUTH SYMPHONY$1,000
CHARLESTON Y M C A$1,000
CHARLESTON SLED HOCKEY CORP$1,000
CHARLESTON HUMANE ASSOCIATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $3k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $2k → 14%KANAWHA VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$124k · 16 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$124k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+17%

Still filing today

44%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesInternationalEducationFood & NutritionHealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MANNA MEAL INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $12k · revenue +64%
  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $12k · revenue +117%
  • UM
    UNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $3k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +8%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY FOR KANAWHA AND PUTNAM
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • GP
    GABRIEL PROJECT OF WEST VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding Southwest Virginia

To provide food and other related products primarily to member agencies for distribution to those in need, and also for direct distribution.

Food & Nutrition
2
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

3
Philanthropy West Virginia Inc

Strengthening philanthropy in the mountain state.

Philanthropy
4
United Methodist Foundation of West Virginia Inc

The mission of the Foundation is to create a culture of generosity by raising, managing, and distributing funds for charitable and religious purposes, with a special interest on United Methodist causes.

Religion
5
Region Iii Workforce Investment Board of Kanawha County

Administer workforce innovation and opportunity act (wioa) funds in kanawha county, west virginia

Employment
6
West Virginia Nonprofit Association Inc

The wvnpa is a membership association dedicated to serving west virginia's nonprofit sector by providing year-round programming, serving as a clearing house of information, tools and resources through our website, and connect the sector…

Public Benefit
7
Washington University of Virginia

Provides seminary, under-graduate, graduate, doctoral, and other continuing education programs

8
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

9
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
10
West Virginia Rural Health Association Inc

The west virginia rural health association (wvrha) advocates for empowering all west virginians to advance their quality of life, their well-being, and their access to excellence in rural health care. our mission is to unite people,…

Health
11
West Virginia University Medical Corporation

To support the West Virginia University School of Medicine in the furtherance of its charitable, scientific, and educational purposes by serving as its faculty practice plan and providing a full range of business management services to its…

Health
12
West Virginia University Innovation Corporation

To offer a wide range of strategic partnerships, academia, employment and community opportunities to the state, while promoting innovation and critical thinking within our workforce. Our vision is to catalyze economic growth and improve…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kanawha Valley Senior Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION — $315,366 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATIONWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC — $12,500 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH R…MANNA MEAL INC — $12,000 · OtherMANNA MEAL INCGREATER NITRO YOUTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherGREATER NITRO YOUTH FO…GKVF-ELEVATORS PROGRAM — $8,500 · OtherGKVF-ELEVATORS PROGRAMUNITED WAY OF WV — $7,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF WVTHE SALVATION ARMY — $6,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYWV YOUTH SYMPHONY — $6,000 · OtherWV YOUTH SYMPHONYAMERICAN RED CROSS — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $4,000 · Other+12 more — $19,000 · Other+12 moreMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC — $23,500 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $11,500 · Human ServicesUNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesKANAWHA VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $5,000 · InternationalHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · InternationalTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC — $4,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 · EducationGABRIEL PROJECT OF WEST VIRGINIA — $2,000 · HealthKANAWHA-CHARLESTON HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC — $500 · Animals
Philanthropy$315,366Other$95,000Food & Nutrition$23,500Human Services$16,500International$11,000Education$8,000Health$2,000Animals$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION — $315,366 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC — $23,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC — $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA MEAL INC — $12,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN MISSION INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGABRIEL PROJECT OF WEST VIRGINIA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKANAWHA VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANAWHA-CHARLESTON HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC
  • Who funds MANNA MEAL INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN MISSION INC
  • Who funds UNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds GABRIEL PROJECT OF WEST VIRGINIA
  • Who funds KANAWHA VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES INC
  • Who funds READ ALOUD WEST VIRGINIA INC
  • Who funds HEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KANAWHA-CHARLESTON HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Encova Foundation of West VirginiaWV24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Encova Foundation of West Virginia · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Tgkvf Inc · The Martha Gaines & Russell Wehrle Memorial Foundation · Bernard H and Blanche E Jacobson Foundation · The Daywood Foundationinc · Bowles Rice Foundation · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Charleston Gazette Mail Charities Inc · Charleston Retail Credit Associatio

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization McJunkin Family Foundation Truist Foundations and Endowment Spec Pract Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph