· Private foundation
The Martha Gaines & Russell Wehrle Memorial Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $143k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHARLESTON AREA MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON | $75,000 |
| A NEW CLENDENIN | $50,000 |
| THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA COUNTY | $25,000 |
| MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK | $25,000 |
| BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| CODA MOUNTAIN ACADEMY | $12,500 |
| TGKVF - COMMUNITY INITIATIVE FUND | $10,000 |
| WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER OF WEST VIRGINIA | $10,000 |
| CLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV | $10,000 |
| WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT | $10,000 |
| EDUCATION ELEVATORS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SAINT MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $10,000 |
| WEST VIRGINIA FOOD AND FARM COALITION | $5,000 |
| READ ALOUD WEST VIRGINIA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCAMC FOUNDATION INC3× · 2022–2025 · $300k · revenue +86%
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC2× · 2024–2025 · $150k · revenue +3%
- CCCLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INC2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +163%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Charleston - INNOVATIVE SCHOLARSone grant, 2024 · $25k
- UOUniversity of Charleston - Innovative Scholarsone grant, 2022 · $25k
- WHWomen's Health Center of WVone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The west virginia chamber of commerce provides opportunities for broad based prosperity throughout west virginia.
The west virginia rural health association (wvrha) advocates for empowering all west virginians to advance their quality of life, their well-being, and their access to excellence in rural health care. our mission is to unite people,…
Promotion and advancement of dentistry in west virginia
To improve the health and health care quality for the residents of west virginia.
Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv
Mountain state justice provides free legal services to low income people in west virginia and assures that low income people have access to the court system.
Communityworks in west virignia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…
Improve the administration of justice and the provision of legal services for west virginia's citizens.
Strengthening philanthropy in the mountain state.
The wvhii is a statewide collaboration among multiple stakeholders focusing on improving the health and health care of the citizens of west virginia.
The wvnpa is a membership association dedicated to serving west virginia's nonprofit sector by providing year-round programming, serving as a clearing house of information, tools and resources through our website, and connect the sector…
Strengthening public health agencies and the broader public health and health care systems in west virginia.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Care of West Virginia Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dr Groves B Smith Guardianship Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 26. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAMC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC ↗
- Who funds LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Coda Mountain Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INC ↗
- Who funds TGKVF INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION ELEVATORS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DAYMARK INC ↗
- Who funds DR GROVES B SMITH GUARDIANSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds KANAWHA COUNTY DENTAL HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds THE APPALACHIAN READING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds READ ALOUD WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds Greenbrier Community School Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANAWHA AND PUTNAM COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Tgkvf Inc · Bernard H and Blanche E Jacobson Foundation · Charles & Mary Fayne Glotfelty Foundation Inc · Herscher Foundation Inc · The Daywood Foundationinc · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · HB Wehrle Foundation Stephen D Wehrle TTEE
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Martha Gaines & Russell Wehrle Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Martha Gaines & Russell Wehrle Memorial Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Martha Gaines & Russell Wehrle Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.