Skip to content

· Private foundation

McGehee Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$315k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$774kReligion$573kEducation$410kInternational$345kHuman Services$176kYouth Development$110kCrime & Legal$21kHousing & Shelter$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $220k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$55,000
SHARE INTERNATIONAL$40,000
TMS GLOBAL (FORMERLY THE MISSION SOCIETY)$35,000
LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$35,000
GRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$30,000
JUVINILE DIABETES ASSOCIATION$25,000
PASSION FOR THE POOR INTL (CHINA-AMERICA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC)$15,000
LIFE CHOICES OF NORTH CENTRAL LOUISIANA$15,000
LOUISIANA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES$15,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH CENTRAL LOUISIANA$10,000
MISSION FOUNDATION INC$5,000
FREEDOM 13 MINISTRIES INC$5,000
TOP OF THE HILL$5,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHELETES$5,000
FREIDRICH'S ATAXI RESEARCH ALLIANCE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $281k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHARE INTERNATIONAL: $40k → 17%SHARE INTERNATIONAL: $40k → 17%SHARE INTERNATIONAL: $35k → 17%SHARE INTERNATIONAL: $35k → 17%SHARE INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 17%SHARE INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 17%SHARE INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 17%SHARE INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 17%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $3k → 32%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $3k → 32%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $2k → 32%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $2k → 32%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $2k → 32%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $2k → 32%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $1k → 32%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $1k → 32%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
PA
MO
VA
MD
TN
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 30% of McGehee Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

McGehee Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 27 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
10

Total granted

$2.4M
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+41%

Still filing today

44%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LT
    LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $410k · revenue +5%
  • SI
    SHARE INTERNATIONAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $265k · revenue +17%
  • LU
    LOUISIANA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • LM
    LTP MEDICAL MOBILE INC DBA THE HEALTH HUT
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • SI
    SEED INDIAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +359%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Mission

To bring the gospel of jesus christ to those who have never heard it and take care of orphans

Religion
2
Activation International Ministries

Teaching and ministering to pastors internationally and in the usa.

Religion
3
Lifehouse Church Missions Inc

The promotion of the gospel of Jesus christ through international evangelism through the establishment of churches, support organizations, and missionaries.

Religion
4
Livingwaterinme Ministries

To spread the love of christ, to restore joy to people, and to revive the lands - revival prayer walks in the us; prayer walks in other countries; speeches and life testimony sharing; mercy ministry; worship & music ministry; children…

Religion
5
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
6
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
7
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
8
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
9
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
10
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
11
Christ Life Ministries

Christ Life Ministries' vision is transforming lives for Christ through the preaching of the gospel and discipleship.

Religion
12
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commission to Every Nation; the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of North Louisiana Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $417,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTMS GLOBAL (FORMERLY THE MISSION SOCIETY): $260,000 · OtherTMS GLOBAL (FORMERLY THE MISSION SOCIETY)GRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $175,000 · OtherGRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHAmerican Diabetes Association Research Foundation Inc: $125,000 · OtherAmerican Diabetes Association Research Foundation IncJUVINILE DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $75,000 · OtherJUVINILE DIABETES ASSOCIATIONPASSION FOR THE POOR INTL (CHINA-AMERICA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC): $54,500 · Other+16 more: $188,800 · Other+16 moreLOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $410,000 · EducationLOUISIANA TECH UNIV…+1 more: $10,000 · EducationSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $265,000 · Human ServicesSHARE INTERNATIONA…LOUISIANA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesLOUISIANA UNITED M…CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $105,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentLIFE CHOICES OF NORTH CENTRAL LOUISIANA: $105,000 · HealthThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $5,000 · HealthTHE MISSION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · ReligionFREEDOM13 MINISTRIES INC: $19,000 · ReligionONEPASSION MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 · ReligionCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $5,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 · ReligionMCWA Inc: $9,000 · InternationalSEED INDIA: $5,000 · InternationalTHE WELL OF NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $7,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,295,800Education$420,000Human Services$401,000Youth Development$110,000Health$110,000Religion$62,000International$14,000Philanthropy$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $410,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $265,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association Research Foundation Inc: $125,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLOUISIANA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $120,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $105,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetLIFE CHOICES OF NORTH CENTRAL LOUISIANA: $105,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetTHE MISSION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetFREEDOM13 MINISTRIES INC: $19,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $16,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetONEPASSION MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPASSION FOR THE POOR INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetMCWA Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE WELL OF NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $7,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetSEED INDIA: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CHOICES OF NORTH CENTRAL LOUISIANA ↗
  • Who funds THE MISSION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM13 MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds ONEPASSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PASSION FOR THE POOR INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MCWA Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WELL OF NORTH LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds SEED INDIA ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North LouisianaLA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McGehee Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McGehee Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McGehee Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to McGehee Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McGehee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph