Skip to content

· Private foundation

McDowell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$164k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$104k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$418kEducation$141kHousing & Shelter$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$85kPhilanthropy$27kFood & Nutrition$20kYouth Development$5kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $104k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$897k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Nebraska$104,420
Haven House St Louis$20,000
Children's Hospital$20,000
St Louis University$10,000
Food Bank of the Rockies$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Jewish Family Services: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 49% of McDowell Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

McDowell Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$686k · 8 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$686k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+42%

Still filing today

63%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HAVENHOUSE ST LOUIS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $385k · revenue +577%
  • GG
    GLOBAL GAMING WOMEN CHARITABLE EDUCATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +588%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • SL
    St Louis Community Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +62%
  • PA
    PROJECT ANGEL HEARTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
2
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
3
Western Colorado Healthcare Alliance

To help rural providers with collaborative solutions and resources focusing on rural healthcare.

Education
4
Denver Health and Hospitals Foundation

Support the work of the denver health and hospital authority in its mission to sustain and advance the health and well-being of denver, colorado and the rocky mountain region.

—
5
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
6
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
7
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
8
Children's Hospital Colorado Health System

to manage the investment of funds on behalf of Children's Hospital Colorado ("Hospital") and Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ("Foundation").

Health
9
St Luke Community Hospital

The mission of st. luke community healthcare is to remain an integral component of the communities of the mission valley through the delivery of personal, compassionate, quality health care in a dignified manner that values our patients,…

Health
10
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
11
Colorado West Healthcare System

The mission of colorado west healthcare system and community hospital is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
12
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Global Gaming Women Charitable Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAVENHOUSE ST LOUIS: $385,000 · HealthHAVENHOUSE ST LOUIS+1 more: $170 · HealthUniversity of Nebraska: $104,420 · OtherUniversity of NebraskaHaven House Saint Louis: $100,000 · OtherHaven House Saint LouisChildren's Hospital: $31,742 · OtherChildren's HospitalUnited Way: $20,000 · OtherUnited Way+3 more: $12,810 · OtherGLOBAL GAMING WOMEN CHARITABLE EDUCATION: $85,000 · Public Safety & DisasterGLOBAL GAMIN…ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $37,000 · EducationFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $20,000 · Food & NutritionJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT ANGEL HEART: $1,500 · Community Improvement
Health$385,170Other$268,972Public Safety & Disaster$85,000Education$37,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Human Services$3,000Community Improvement$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAVENHOUSE ST LOUIS: $385,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetGLOBAL GAMING WOMEN CHARITABLE EDUCATION: $85,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $37,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENDALL & TAYLOR ATKINSON FOUNDATION: $7,155 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL HEART: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $170 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAVENHOUSE ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GAMING WOMEN CHARITABLE EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds KENDALL & TAYLOR ATKINSON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL HEART ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McDowell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McDowell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McDowell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph