Skip to content
McCutchin-Collins Charitable Trust Mass 031292 at a glance

· Private foundation

McCutchin-Collins Charitable Trust Mass 031292

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$6.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$6.3MEducation$535kInternational$450kHealth$405kArts & Culture$351kReligion$169kHuman Services$82kAnimals$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $41k
  • $250k+1 grant · $6.3M
$300
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
T Rowe Price Charitable Fund$6,319,278
St Dunstans Church$41,200
The Admiral Fund$2,400
St Dunstans Church$500
WGBH$400
Coasta Maine Botanical Garden$375
Clark University$300
Museum of Fine Arts$300
Trustees of Reservations$250
St Jude Childrens Hospital$200
Dana Farber Cancer Institute$200
Animal Welfare Society$200
Maine Island Trail Association$100
New York Team for Kids$100
Appalachian Mountain Club$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Ronald Mc Donald House: $500 → 15%Friends of Thai Daughters: $600 → 9%Friends of Thai Daughters: $600 → 9%Friends of Thai Daughters: $600 → 9%Friends of Thai Daughters: $600 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
NJ
CT
RI
CA
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 71 repeat orgs$6.3M to everyone else

71 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 62 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
23

Total granted

$1.9M
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+45%

Still filing today

46%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    STUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $400k · revenue +116%
  • ST
    STEEP THEATRE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $346k · revenue +24% · 32% of their budget
  • PC
    PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $160k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • CC
    CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGYgraduated
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue +25%
  • DI
    DANA-FARBER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +279%
  • C
    CaringBridge
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
7
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
8
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
9
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
12
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West End House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hoparts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
39/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

T Rowe Price Charitable Fund: $6,319,278 · OtherT Rowe Price Charitable Fund+70 more: $656,350 · Other+70 moreSTUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC: $400,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $24,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $23,000 · International+2 more: $2,600 · InternationalSTEEP THEATRE: $346,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $3,585 · Arts & CultureBowdoin College: $111,400 · EducationLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $108,000 · EducationTHE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC: $14,000 · Education+5 more: $11,400 · EducationNewbridge Services Inc: $159,000 · Health+5 more: $13,550 · HealthPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $160,000 · PhilanthropySYLVAN HEIGHTS WATERFOWL PARK & ECO-CENTER INC: $7,000 · AnimalsMEDFIELD ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $4,700 · Animals+1 more: $200 · Animals
Other$6,975,628International$449,600Arts & Culture$349,585Education$244,800Health$172,550Philanthropy$160,000Animals$11,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC: $400,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetSTEEP THEATRE: $346,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNewbridge Services Inc: $159,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBowdoin College: $111,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $108,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSYLVAN HEIGHTS WATERFOWL PARK & ECO-CENTER INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMorgan Memorial Goodwill Industries Inc: $6,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDFIELD ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $4,700 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetROGERS PARK MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $4,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEST END HOUSE INC: $3,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $3,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZEN SCHOOLS INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $2,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetACCION INTERNATIONAL: $2,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC: $2,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PARK SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC: $2,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDOVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,200 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHALE EDUCATION INC: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $1,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MEALI INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAILING HEALS INC: $900 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $585 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPARTS: $500 over 1y, 13% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Island Trail Association: $475 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER INK INC: $400 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetORLEANS CONSERVATION TRUST: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON HARBOR NOW INC: $300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSALT PONDS COALITION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GARDNER MUSEUM INC: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEEP THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Newbridge Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bowdoin College ↗
  • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds THE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds SYLVAN HEIGHTS WATERFOWL PARK & ECO-CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDFIELD ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROGERS PARK MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST END HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITIZEN SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ACCION INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank Foundati…Aaf Charitable Founda…Boston Foundation IncLiberty Mutual Founda…T Rowe Price Program …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Fidelity FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…The Pfizer Foundation…Renaissance Charitabl…
Eastern Bank FoundationMA14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Aaf Charitable Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McCutchin-Collins Charitable Trust Mass 031292 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McCutchin-Collins Charitable Trust Mass 031292. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Boston Harbor Now Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Newbridge Services Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Citizen Schools Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Trustees of Clark University: 2% of income from government
  • West End House Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Orleans Conservation Trust: 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Epiphany School Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McCutchin-Collins Charitable Trust Mass 031292’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home