· Private foundation
McCutchin-Collins Charitable Trust Mass 031292
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $5k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $41k
- $250k+1 grant · $6.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| T Rowe Price Charitable Fund | $6,319,278 |
| St Dunstans Church | $41,200 |
| The Admiral Fund | $2,400 |
| St Dunstans Church | $500 |
| WGBH | $400 |
| Coasta Maine Botanical Garden | $375 |
| Museum of Fine Arts | $300 |
| Clark University | $300 |
| Trustees of Reservations | $250 |
| Dana Farber Cancer Institute | $200 |
| Animal Welfare Society | $200 |
| St Jude Childrens Hospital | $200 |
| Appalachian Mountain Club | $100 |
| New York Team for Kids | $100 |
| Maine Island Trail Association | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
71 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 62 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SDSTUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC4× · 2020–2023 · $400k · revenue +116%
- STSTEEP THEATRE4× · 2020–2023 · $346k · revenue +24% · 32% of their budget
- PCPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2023 · $160k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- DIDANA-FARBER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +192%
- CCaringBridge3× · 2021–2023 · $1k · revenue -3%
- CCCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGYgraduated2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.
Education and Research
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West End House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hoparts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STUDENT DIPLOMACY CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds STEEP THEATRE ↗
- Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Newbridge Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Bowdoin College ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds THE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds SYLVAN HEIGHTS WATERFOWL PARK & ECO-CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries Inc ↗
- Who funds MEDFIELD ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds ROGERS PARK MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WEST END HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds CITIZEN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ACCION INTERNATIONAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Aaf Charitable Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization McCutchin-Collins Charitable Trust Mass 031292 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boston Harbor Now Inc — 45% of income from government
- Newbridge Services Inc — 24% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries Inc — 17% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Citizen Schools Inc — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Trustees of Clark University — 2% of income from government
- West End House Inc — 2% of income from government
- Orleans Conservation Trust — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
- The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Epiphany School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Museum of Fine Arts — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.