Skip to content

· Private foundation

McCune-Brooks Health Care Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$398k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$510kEducation$326kCrime & Legal$100kHuman Services$48kReligion$2kEmployment$620Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $348k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACCESS FAMILY CARE$105,330
MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION$100,000
CARTHAGE R-9 FOUNDATION$82,500
MERCY HOSPITAL CARTHAGE$59,690
JASPER COUNTY CASA$25,000
FAIR ACRES FAMILY YMCA$20,400
COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SW MO$4,000
Individual grant recipient$603
CARTHAGE TECHNICAL CENTER$500
LAVERNE WILLIAMS CHILDREN'S CHRISTM$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HAPPY BOTTOMS: $743 → 15%FAIR ACRES FAMILY YMCA: $20k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$912k · 10 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
15

Total granted

$912k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEmploymentHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MERCY HOSPITAL CARTHAGE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $378k · revenue +37%
  • MS
    MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $200k · revenue +89%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI
    2× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • CC
    CARTHAGE CROSSLINES MINISTRYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +81%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HAVEN
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Health Center of Se Kansas Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
2
Ccmh Corporation

Provide a healthcare facility offering acure care, skilled care, outpatient services, and emergency medical services to residents of carroll county, kentucky and surrounding areas.

Health
3
Christian Community Care Clinic

To provide medical care to the uninsured.

Health
4
Health Ministries Clinic Inc

To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ

Religion
5
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
6
Labette County Medical Center

We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.

Health
7
Baptist Community Health Services Inc

Motivated by the love and compassion of christ and in keeping with our baptist heritage, bchs provides quality primary healthcare and behavioral healthcare to individuals in medically underserved communities.

Health
8
Southwest Utah Community Health Center

Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.

Health
9
Copiah County Human Resource Agency

To provide a safe and customer friendly service to the citizens in a manner consistent with the agencys Steaerdship of the communities trust and resources.

Philanthropy
10
Ozark Health Inc Van Buren Co Mem Hosp & Nursing Home

Acute care hospital, nursing home, rural health clinic, and home health agency

Health
11
Mercy Health Southwest Missourikansas Communities

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

—
12
Southeast Missouri Health Network

Semo health network is committed to providing affordable, quality healthcare to the communities of southeast missouri.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Clinic of Southwest Missouri; the most unlike its peers is Innovative Industries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MERCY HOSPITAL CARTHAGE: $377,681 · OtherMERCY HOSPITAL CARTHAGEIndividual grant recipient: $69,658 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $24,031 · Other+17 more: $71,239 · Other+17 moreMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EducationMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATIONCARTHAGE R-9 SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $123,528 · EducationCARTHAGE R-9 SCHOOL FOUNDATIONOZARK TRI-COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSORTIUM: $105,330 · Housing & ShelterOZARK TRI-…JASPER COUNTY CASA: $100,000 · Crime & LegalJASPER COU…FAIR ACRES FAMILY YMCA INC: $20,400 · Human ServicesHAPPYBOTTOMS: $743 · Human ServicesLIFECHOICES: $7,200 · HealthInnovative Industries: $620 · Employment
Other$542,609Education$323,528Housing & Shelter$105,330Crime & Legal$100,000Human Services$21,143Health$7,200Employment$620

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCY HOSPITAL CARTHAGE: $377,681 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCARTHAGE R-9 SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $123,528 over 4y, 19% of budgetOZARK TRI-COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSORTIUM: $105,330 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJASPER COUNTY CASA: $100,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCARTHAGE CROSSLINES MINISTRY: $13,366 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLIFECHOICES: $7,200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHAPPYBOTTOMS: $743 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInnovative Industries: $620 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERCY HOSPITAL CARTHAGE ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARTHAGE R-9 SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OZARK TRI-COUNTY HEALTH CARE CONSORTIUM ↗
  • Who funds JASPER COUNTY CASA ↗
  • Who funds FAIR ACRES FAMILY YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds CARTHAGE CROSSLINES MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds LIFECHOICES ↗
  • Who funds HAPPYBOTTOMS ↗
  • Who funds Innovative Industries ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ir Tua KD&ML Steadley CharitableTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ir Tua KD&ML Steadley Charitable · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Helen S Boylan Foundation · W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services · Marsh Family Fdn · Ruth I Kolpin Foundation · Jasper County Association for Social Ser · Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable · Arvest Foundation · Servant Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McCune-Brooks Health Care Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McCune-Brooks Health Care Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McCune-Brooks Health Care Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to McCune-Brooks Health Care Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McCune-Brooks Health Care’s filings →

    More from the funding graph