Skip to content

· Private foundation

McCortney Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$113kFood & Nutrition$106kEducation$95kInternational$62kHealth$34kCrime & Legal$29kArts & Culture$25kAnimals$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $87k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $43k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$792k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUR LADY OF TEPEYAC HIGH SCHOOL$12,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$11,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$10,000
THE FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL AND NE MO$10,000
THE NIGHT MINISTRY$8,000
TRUE NORTH OF COLUMBIA INC$7,000
CASA CENTRAL$6,000
HEART OF MISSOURI - CASA$6,000
WBEZ$5,000
COLUMBIA CENTER FOR URBAN AGRICULTURE$5,000
KMOS UNIV OF CENTRAL MO$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
KBIA UNIVERSITY OF MO$5,000
HAVE DREAMS$5,000
WTTW$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CITY OF REFUGE: $5k → 17%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $8k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $7k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $6k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $5k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $4k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $4k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $4k → 14%SHARE OUR SPARE: $5k → 14%SHARE OUR SPARE: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$483k · 25 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
5

Total granted

$483k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+79%

Still filing today

48%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalArts & CultureInternationalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $62k · revenue +39%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +17%
  • HO
    HEART OF MISSOURI CASA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +427%

Funded once

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF TEPEYAC HS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COOK COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +79%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF GOOD SHEPARD
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens Advocacy Center of East Central Illinois

To assist children who have been victims of abuse

Crime & Legal
2
Chicago Children's Advocacy Center

The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.

Crime & Legal
3
Citizens Against Spouse Abuse Inc

The mission of citizens against spouse abuse, inc. is to empower domestic and sexual violence survivors to regain control of their lives through education, advocacy, and coordination of community resources.

—
4
Casa of St Louis

Casa of st. louis advocates for abused and neglected children and youth in st. louis by representing their best interests in court and in the community. our vision is that every child lives in a safe permanent home and has the opportunity…

Civil Rights
5
Child Safe of Central Missouri Inc

Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…

Crime & Legal
6
Casa of Dupage County Inc

Recruit, train, and support volunteer citizen advocates to effectively speak to the best interests of abused, neglected, and dependent children in dupage county's juvenile court system because every child has a right to a safe, permanent…

Civil Rights
7
Casa of South Central Missouri

To provide a voice for the abused and neglected children in the 25th judicial court system. trained and committed volunteers work in conjunction with key agencies and legal representatives of the children to shorten the time from the court…

Human Services
8
Jackson County Casa

Casa is a unique non-profit helping abused and neglected children in the jackson county family court system. our team of trained volunteers,staff case supervisors, and staff attorneys allow each child to be represented in a court of law…

Civil Rights
9
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Southwest Missouri

Recruit, train and support community volunteers who assist the court in protecting the best interests of abused and neglected children in southwest missouri.

Civil Rights
10
Casa of East Central Illinois

Court appointed special advocates for abused and neglected children in the juvenile court jurisdictions of coles and cumberland counties, illinois

Civil Rights
11
Casa of West Central Illinois

To advocate for abused and neglected children in the legal welfare system.

Crime & Legal
12
Casa of Southwestern Illinois

To recruit, train, supervise and support volunteers who advocate for the best interest (reduction of physical, emotional, intellectual and social injuries) for abused and neglected children in the court system.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa Central Social Services Corporation; the most unlike its peers is True North of Columbia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUR LADY OF TEPEYAC HIGH SCHOOL: $54,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF TEPEYAC HIGH SCHOOLTHE FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL AND NE MO: $32,500 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL AND NE MOLAMBS INC: $21,500 · OtherLAMBS INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBIA: $16,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBIAIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherKBIA UNIVERSITY OF MO: $10,500 · OtherKMOS UNIV OF CENTRAL MO: $10,500 · OtherOUR LADY OF TEPEYAC HS: $10,000 · OtherCHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $9,000 · OtherCOYOTE HILL FOSTER CARE MINISTIES: $8,000 · OtherCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL: $10,500 · Other+10 more: $45,000 · Other+10 moreTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $34,500 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRYTRUE NORTH OF COLUMBIA INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesTRUE NORTH OF COLUMB…CASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION: $21,500 · Human ServicesCASA CENTRAL SOCIAL …Share our Spare: $8,500 · Human ServicesShare our SpareCITY OF REFUGE: $5,000 · Human ServicesCITY OF REFUGEMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $62,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $46,500 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICA…THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $13,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD BANK…HEART OF MISSOURI CASA: $25,000 · Crime & LegalCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COOK COUNTY: $3,500 · Crime & LegalHAVE DREAMS: $23,500 · EmploymentColumbia Center for Urban Agriculture: $13,500 · Environment
Other$238,500Human Services$92,500International$62,000Food & Nutrition$59,500Crime & Legal$28,500Employment$23,500Environment$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $62,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $46,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $34,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHEART OF MISSOURI CASA: $25,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHAVE DREAMS: $23,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTRUE NORTH OF COLUMBIA INC: $23,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION: $21,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetColumbia Center for Urban Agriculture: $13,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetShare our Spare: $8,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COOK COUNTY: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINVESTIGATIVE REPORTERS & EDITORS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF MISSOURI CASA ↗
  • Who funds HAVE DREAMS ↗
  • Who funds TRUE NORTH OF COLUMBIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Columbia Center for Urban Agriculture ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds CHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Share our Spare ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COOK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds INVESTIGATIVE REPORTERS & EDITORS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orscheln Industries Foundation IncMO17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Veterans United Foundation · Boone County Community Trust · Heart of Missouri United Way Inc · Stafford Family Charitable Trust · Allen P and Josephine B Green · AbbVie Foundation · Boone Electric Community Trust · WP & HB White Foundation · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Dr Scholl Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McCortney Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McCortney Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McCortney Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to McCortney Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McCortney’s filings →

    More from the funding graph