Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

McCarthy Redland Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$112k
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$171kReligion$133kHealth$51kInternational$49kHuman Services$27kCommunity Improvement$21kHousing & Shelter$8kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k35 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $58k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUTHORIZED ACQUISITIONS LLC$19,690
ST LEO'S PARISH$18,000
THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF$10,000
GLOBAL PARTNERS IN HOPE$10,000
ST PIUS XST LEO SCHOOL$6,000
ACCELERATED SCHOOLS OF OVERLAND$5,000
ST WENCESLAUS PARISH$5,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$4,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF$2,000
FOOD BANK OF THE HEARTLAND$2,000
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$2,000
LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF$1,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
KICKS FOR A CURE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $1k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $1k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $1k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $1k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $1k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $1k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $1k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $1k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF: $2k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA INC: $1k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA INC: $1k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $1k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $1k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $1k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $1k → 12%WOMENS CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $1k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADAVNCEMENT: $1k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $1k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MN
IL
NY
SD
IA
UT
CO
NE
MD
KS
AR
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$321k · 43 repeat orgs$162k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
26

Total granted

$321k
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+54%

Still filing today

63%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND
    4× · 2018–2025 · $6k · revenue +121%
  • CU
    Creighton University
    4× · 2018–2025 · $5k · revenue +56%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    4× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • SL
    ST LEO PARISH
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
  • SL
    ST LEO THE GREAT
    one grant, 2018 · $18k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DA
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
2
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
3
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
4
Catholic Charities Foundation

Support the mission and social services programs of catholic charities of the archdiocese of omaha, inc.

Religion
5
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

6
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
7
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

8
Advocate Health Care Network

The mission of advocate health care is to serve the health needs of individuals, families and communities through a wholistic philosophy rooted in our fundamental understanding of human beings as created in the image of god.

Health
9
Nebraska Methodist Hospital

Nebraska methodist hospital (commonly know as "methodist hospital") is an acute care facility dedicated to bringing high quality care for the mind, body and spirit of every person. we provide community-based health care, health education…

Health
10
Nebraska Organ Recovery System

We transform lives through organ and tissue donation.

Health
11
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

12
Good Samaritan Foundation

Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Nebraska and the most unlike its peers is Curepsp Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-8 SchoolsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Food Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support OrganizationsVeteran Support ServicesYouth Sports Booster Organi…Pregnancy Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Public University Foundatio…Community Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number15%0%<5yr10%3%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr15%8%20–35yr17%24%35–55yr24%47%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value15%0%<5yr10%2%5–10yr19%33%10–20yr15%5%20–35yr17%15%35–55yr24%44%55yr+

The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/41
the rest of the field
8%
1,067/14,071

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST PIUS X CHURCH ST LEO SCHOOL — $69,500 · OtherST PIUS X CHURCH ST LEO SCHOOLMARIAN HIGH SCHOOL — $36,000 · OtherMARIAN HIGH SCHOOLTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS — $20,000 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSST LEO THE GREAT PARISH — $20,000 · OtherST LEO THE GREAT PARISHAUTHORIZED ACQUISITIONS LLC — $19,690 · OtherAUTHORIZED ACQUISITIONS LLCST LEO PARISH — $18,000 · OtherST LEO'S PARISH — $18,000 · OtherST LEO THE GREAT — $18,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONAL — $14,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL EXCHANGEINC — $14,000 · Other+43 more — $113,000 · Other+43 moreACCELERATED SCHOOLS OF OVERLAND PARK INC — $30,000 · EducationACCELERATE…Creighton University — $5,000 · EducationCreighton …UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $4,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $4,000 · EducationHASTINGS C…CHI HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthHEALING KADI FOUNDATION — $4,000 · HealthKICKS FOR A CURE INC — $4,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $4,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $4,000 · HealthCUREPSP INC — $2,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SURGERY OF THE HAND — $2,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS NEBRASKA — $2,000 · HealthTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS — $4,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT — $4,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE — $4,000 · Human ServicesEPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE — $3,000 · Human ServicesUnbound — $2,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL PARTNERS IN HOPE — $10,000 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated — $4,000 · InternationalFriends of Extension and 4-H in Douglas-Sarpy County — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $4,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$360,190Education$43,000Health$32,000Human Services$24,500International$14,000Youth Development$5,000Housing & Shelter$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetACCELERATED SCHOOLS OF OVERLAND PARK INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetGLOBAL PARTNERS IN HOPE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHI HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING KADI FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetKICKS FOR A CURE INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 4y, 72% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Extension and 4-H in Douglas-Sarpy County — $3,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBETHLEHEM HOUSE — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCUREPSP INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnbound — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SURGERY OF THE HAND — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS NEBRASKA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF OMAHA NEBRASKA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION RED WINGS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABIDE NETWORK INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ACCELERATED SCHOOLS OF OVERLAND PARK INC
  • Who funds GLOBAL PARTNERS IN HOPE
  • Who funds CHI HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND
  • Who funds Creighton University
  • Who funds THE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds HEALING KADI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KICKS FOR A CURE INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE
  • Who funds EPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC
  • Who funds Friends of Extension and 4-H in Douglas-Sarpy County

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charles and Mary Heider Family FoundationNE24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · Spreetail Foundation · The Fred and Sally Bekins Foundation · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · The Sherwood Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization McCarthy Redland Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McCarthy Redland Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to McCarthy Redland Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph