Skip to content

· Private foundation

McCarthy Redland Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$112k
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$171kReligion$133kHealth$51kInternational$49kHuman Services$27kCommunity Improvement$21kHousing & Shelter$8kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k35 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $58k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUTHORIZED ACQUISITIONS LLC$19,690
ST LEO'S PARISH$18,000
GLOBAL PARTNERS IN HOPE$10,000
THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF$10,000
ST PIUS XST LEO SCHOOL$6,000
ST WENCESLAUS PARISH$5,000
ACCELERATED SCHOOLS OF OVERLAND$5,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$4,000
FOOD BANK OF THE HEARTLAND$2,000
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$2,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF$2,000
LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF$1,500
BETHLEHEM HOUSE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $1k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $1k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $1k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $1k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $1k → 12%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $1k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $1k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $1k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF: $2k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA INC: $1k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA INC: $1k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $1k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $1k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $1k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $1k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADAVNCEMENT: $1k → 12%WOMENS CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $1k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $1k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
NY
SD
IA
UT
CO
NE
MD
KS
AR
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$331k · 43 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
25

Total granted

$331k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+54%

Still filing today

63%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND
    4× · 2018–2025 · $6k · revenue +121%
  • CU
    Creighton University
    4× · 2018–2025 · $5k · revenue +56%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    3× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • SL
    ST LEO PARISH
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
  • SL
    ST LEO THE GREAT
    one grant, 2018 · $18k
  • CH
    CHI HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
2
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
3
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
4
Catholic Charities Foundation

Support the mission and social services programs of catholic charities of the archdiocese of omaha, inc.

Religion
5
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
6
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
7
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
8
Advocate Health Care Network

The mission of advocate health care is to serve the health needs of individuals, families and communities through a wholistic philosophy rooted in our fundamental understanding of human beings as created in the image of god.

Health
9
Nebraska Methodist Hospital

Nebraska methodist hospital (commonly know as "methodist hospital") is an acute care facility dedicated to bringing high quality care for the mind, body and spirit of every person. we provide community-based health care, health education…

Health
10
Nebraska Organ Recovery System

We transform lives through organ and tissue donation.

Health
11
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
12
Good Samaritan Foundation

Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Nebraska; the most unlike its peers is Curepsp Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PIUS X CHURCH ST LEO SCHOOL: $69,500 · OtherST PIUS X CHURCH ST LEO SCHOOLMARIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $36,000 · OtherMARIAN HIGH SCHOOLTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $30,000 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSST LEO THE GREAT PARISH: $20,000 · OtherST LEO THE GREAT PARISHAUTHORIZED ACQUISITIONS LLC: $19,690 · OtherAUTHORIZED ACQUISITIONS LLCST LEO PARISH: $18,000 · OtherST LEO THE GREAT: $18,000 · OtherST LEO'S PARISH: $18,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $14,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL EXCHANGEINC: $14,000 · Other+42 more: $103,000 · Other+42 moreACCELERATED SCHOOLS OF OVERLAND PARK INC: $30,000 · EducationACCELERATE…Creighton University: $5,000 · EducationCreighton …HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationHASTINGS C…UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…CHI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthHEALING KADI FOUNDATION: $4,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,000 · HealthKICKS FOR A CURE INC: $4,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $4,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SURGERY OF THE HAND: $2,000 · HealthCUREPSP INC: $2,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS NEBRASKA: $2,000 · HealthOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $4,000 · Human ServicesEPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $4,000 · Human ServicesTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $4,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $3,000 · Human ServicesUnbound: $2,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL PARTNERS IN HOPE: $10,000 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated: $4,000 · InternationalFriends of Extension and 4-H in Douglas-Sarpy County: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $4,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$360,190Education$43,000Health$32,000Human Services$24,500International$14,000Youth Development$5,000Housing & Shelter$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACCELERATED SCHOOLS OF OVERLAND PARK INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetGLOBAL PARTNERS IN HOPE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING KADI FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKICKS FOR A CURE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetEPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 72% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Extension and 4-H in Douglas-Sarpy County: $3,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SURGERY OF THE HAND: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETHLEHEM HOUSE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCUREPSP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS NEBRASKA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF OMAHA NEBRASKA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUnbound: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABIDE NETWORK INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION RED WINGS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ACCELERATED SCHOOLS OF OVERLAND PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL PARTNERS IN HOPE ↗
  • Who funds CHI HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds HEALING KADI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds KICKS FOR A CURE INC ↗
  • Who funds EPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charles and Mary Heider Family FoundationNE24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · Spreetail Foundation · The Fred and Sally Bekins Foundation · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · The Sherwood Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McCarthy Redland Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McCarthy Redland Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McCarthy Redland Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to McCarthy Redland Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McCarthy Redland Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph