· Private foundation
Mb Caddyshack Charity Golf Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k39 grants · $166k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST CECILIA FOUNDATION | $12,371 |
| NIKKI MITCHELL FOUNDATION | $11,942 |
| GIANTS 4 CHRIST | $11,942 |
| BIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS OF NE FL | $11,941 |
| FOUNDATION TO BE NAMED LATER | $7,961 |
| GEORGIA NATURAL RESOURCES FOUNDATIO | $7,961 |
| TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION | $7,961 |
| THE FIRST TEE OF NORTH FLA | $7,961 |
| THE DAILY'S FOUNDATION | $7,961 |
| FIRST IN FOUNDATION | $7,961 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESERACH HOSPITAL | $7,961 |
| THE FIRST TEE OF AUGUSTA | $7,961 |
| STOP CHILDRENS CANCER | $7,961 |
| GRANT FUHR FOUNDATION | $7,961 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MISSISSIPPI VA | $7,961 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
41 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCENTRAL COAST JR GOLF INC7× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +80%
- GFGRANT FUHR FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +242%
- NMNikki Mitchell Foundation Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $26k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- HSHOPE4HOPETOWN - SIPone grant, 2019 · $13k
- FSFirehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Incone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -6%
- CCCHIVE CHARITIESone grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue -15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to make a difference in the lives of children affected by cancer and other life-threatening illnesses. we strive to improve the quality of life and well-being for them and their families by offering financial…
To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.
Raise money to support families and children suffering from childhood cancer.
CancerFree KIDS exists to raise awareness of the need for more funding for pediatric cancer research and to raise funds that are invested in early stage, potentially game-changing research focused on gentler treatments and cures for…
Provide monetary or financial aid exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and to solicit, receive, maintain and disburse funds for these purposes and for the betterment of children.
The sam day foundation advances research for childhood and young adult cancers and facilitates wellness-centered support and experiences so kids with cancer can survive and live well.
The organization's primary mission is to support children battling cancer by funding programs that improve patients' quality of life, treatment programs that increase survivorship, and pediatric medical research dedicated to finding a cure.
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
Enabling people battling cancer and other diseases to obtain vital quality of life needs and services not funded by traditional medical reimbursements.
National pediatric cancer foundation (npcf) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to funding research to eliminate childhood cancer. our focus is to fund research to find less toxic, more targeted therapies by partnering with leading…
A leading voice in the young adult cancer movement, ulman foundation creates a community of support for young adults and their loved ones impacted by cancer. this is carried out through our four pillars of action: giving and getting…
The andrew mcdonough b+ foundation fights childhood cancer by: providing financial assistance to families of kids with cancer; funding cutting-edge pediatric cancer research; and advocating for increased funding and awareness.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marine Toys for Tots Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Jim and Tabitha Furyk Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE STEVE AZAR ST CECILIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENNY HAMLIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL COAST JR GOLF INC ↗
- Who funds GRANT FUHR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Nikki Mitchell Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE JIM AND TABITHA FURYK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FORE AUGUSTA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Dailys Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds RESPECT 90 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STOP CHILDREN'S CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds CURE DUCHENNE ↗
- Who funds Sisters of St Joseph Inc ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DEE NORTON LOWCOUNTRY CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pga Tour Inc · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mb Caddyshack Charity Golf Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dbwpc Inc — 10% of income from government
- Barry University Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mb Caddyshack Charity Golf Inc?
Find your warmest path to Mb Caddyshack Charity Golf Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.