· Private foundation
Maytiv Foundation of Nevada
Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2021.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k3 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $86k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IB DONOR ADVISED FUND | $1,257,000 |
| CLALIT HEALTH | $571,428 |
| Individual grant recipient | $85,714 |
| Individual grant recipient | $22,127 |
| BONEI OLAM | $15,000 |
| WEST SIDE KOLLEL | $10,640 |
| THE HAMPTON SYNAGOGUE | $5,000 |
| LINCOLN SQUARE SYNAGOGUE | $3,200 |
| STAND WITH US | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 100% of Maytiv Foundation of Nevada’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 69% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 0%.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2021, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- COCONGREGATION OF ATERES SHALOM2× · 2019–2020 · $1.2M
- COCONGREGATION OF CHABAD YISRAEL2× · 2019–2020 · $800k
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2018–2019 · $300k
Funded once
- CACONGREGATION ATERES SHALOMone grant, 2018 · $450k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $200k
- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH OF ISRAELone grant, 2018 · $150k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Friends of united hatzalah, inc .(fouh) raises and provides funding to not-for-profit organizations that provide medical and trauma-related first responder services in israel and around the world. fouh focuses the majority of its support…
To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.
The mission of children's health alliance for israel, inc. (chai) is to raise and administer funds for schneider children medical center of israel (scmci), israel's only hospital exclusively dedicated to the healthcare of all children,…
To further jewish education in israel
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EMUNAH OUTREACH CORP ↗
- Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI CHILDREN'S CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE LITTLE ORCHESTRA SOCIETYORPHEON INC ↗
- Who funds MAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Maytiv Foundation of Nevada funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maytiv Foundation of Nevada. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Maytiv Foundation of Nevada?
Find your warmest path to Maytiv Foundation of Nevada through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Maytiv Foundation of Nevada’s filings →