Skip to content
Mayor's Charity Ball Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mayor's Charity Ball Inc

To encourage the Saint Charles County community to support local charitable organizations.

$121k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Health$90kHuman Services$81kYouth Development$37kEmployment$25kHousing & Shelter$17kArts & Culture$15kCrime & Legal$10kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $113,952, the rows itemized in this filing. The $120,852 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,900 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $107k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$194k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Justin Delivers Hope$35,000
Boys & Girls Club of St Charles Co$16,952
Green Lantern Senior Center$15,000
St Charles Co Veterans Museum$15,000
Boone Center Inc$15,000
Share Pregnancy & Infant Loss Support$10,000
Habitat for Humanity St Charles Co$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%OUR LADYS INN: $10k → 11%YOUTH IN NEED: $10k → 5%UNLIMITED PLAY: $10k → 5%COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $10k → 5%FIRST STEP BACK HOME: $10k → 5%FAMILY FORWARD: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Advocacy and Community Training Inc

Enhance the opportunities and quality of life for children and youth with disabilities. the organization achieves this objective through parent training, emotional support, direct advocacy, community education, self-advocacy and navigation…

—
2
St Louis Arc Inc

To empower people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families to lead better lives by providing a lifetime of high-quality services, family support and advocacy.

Human Services
3
St Louis Center

Serving individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in an intentional, faith-based community.

—
4
Child Center-Marygrove

Providing a safe home, compassionate care and high-quality mental health services to children and youth who have experienced significant trauma, to restore their childhood and equip them to productive adulthood.

Health
5
Perry County Services Inc

Provide support services to developmentally disabled individuals of perry county,missouri through areas of community employment, job preparation, day programs, transportation and personal assistance.

Human Services
6
Recovery St Louis
Health
7
Creative Concepts for Living Inc

Assist individuals with developmental disabilities in achieving the goal of living in their community of choice with the necessary support

Human Services
8
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

—
9
St Martin's Child Center

Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri

—
10
Linkability Inc

Provide Case Management for people with developmental disabilities such as autism services, respite care, crisis intervention, self directed services, and Medicaid Home and Cummunity Based Waiver programs. A daycare was opened in 2025 to…

Human Services
11
Child Safe of Central Missouri Inc

Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…

Crime & Legal
12
Center for Family and Youth Services

Agency delivers outpatient mental health counseling to at risk youth and families in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth in Need; the most unlike its peers is Justin Delivers Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT LOUIS COUNSELING INC: $25,000 · OtherSAINT LOUIS COUNSELING INCSAINT CHARLES FAMILY YMCA: $25,000 · OtherSAINT CHARLES FAMILY YMCABOONE CENTER INC: $15,000 · OtherBOONE CENTER INCGreen Lantern Senior Center: $15,000 · OtherGreen Lantern Senior CenterSALVATION ARMY: $10,880 · OtherSALVATION ARMYSAINT VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherSAINT VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST CHARLES SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherST CHARLES SCHOOL FOUNDATIONHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ST CHARLES COUNTY: $7,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ST CHARLES COUNTYCOMMUNITY LIVING INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY LIVING INCCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF…UNLIMITED PLAY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesUNLIMITED PLAY INCOUR LADYS INN: $10,000 · Human ServicesOUR LADYS INNEagles Wings: $10,000 · Human ServicesEagles WingsYOUTH IN NEED: $10,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH IN NEEDFIRST STEP BACK HOME INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFIRST STEP BACK HOME INCJUSTIN DELIVERS HOPE: $35,000 · HealthJUSTIN DELIVERS …ADAM MORGAN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthADAM MORGAN FOUN…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST CHARLES COUNTY: $16,952 · Youth DevelopmentMID AMERICAN VETERANS MUSEUM: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS: $10,000 · EmploymentSHARE PREGNANCY & INFANT LOSS SUPPORT: $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$125,880Human Services$70,000Health$45,000Youth Development$16,952Arts & Culture$15,000Employment$10,000Community Improvement$10,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUSTIN DELIVERS HOPE: $35,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST CHARLES COUNTY: $16,952 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBOONE CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMID AMERICAN VETERANS MUSEUM: $15,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIVING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNLIMITED PLAY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOUR LADYS INN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetADAM MORGAN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetCONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHARE PREGNANCY & INFANT LOSS SUPPORT: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetYOUTH IN NEED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ST CHARLES COUNTY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

World Wide Technology…Employees Community F…Commerce Bancshares F…St Louis Community Fo…Youthbridge Community…Norman J Stupp Founda…United Way of Greater…The Blackbaud Giving …Edward Jones Foundati…Bjc Health System Dba…Moneta Group Charitab…Raymond and Grace Har…
World Wide Technology FoundationMO25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: World Wide Technology Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Norman J Stupp Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Edward Jones Foundation · Bjc Health System Dba Bjc Healthcare · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Raymond and Grace Harmon Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mayor's Charity Ball Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mayor's Charity Ball Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mayor's Charity Ball Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mayor's Charity Ball Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports $19k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mayor's Charity Ball’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home