Skip to content
Mayo Clinic Group Return at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mayo Clinic Group Return

To inspire hope and contribute to health and well-being by providing the best care to every patient through integrated clinical practice, education, and research.

$1.7B
Granted FY2024still arriving
293
Grants FY2024still arriving
36
States reached
$1.6B
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

98% of Mayo Clinic Group Return’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Mayo Clinic, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 286 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

232
’17
236
’18
236
’19
197
’20
251
’21
251
’22
274
’23
286
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$12.2BEducation$252MPhilanthropy$18MScience & Tech$15MHousing & Shelter$7.5MReligion$2.8MCommunity Improvement$1.6MHuman Services$1.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 293 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k66 grants · $482k
  • $10k–50k146 grants · $2.8M
  • $50k–250k49 grants · $5.7M
  • $250k+32 grants · $1.7B
$19,468
Median grant
36
States reached
$17.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$1,628,083,733
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$2,967,624
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$2,176,906
EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF MINNESOTA$1,998,350
THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$1,730,069
EMORY UNIVERSITY$1,604,987
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,242,192
NEXUS FAMILY HEALING$1,100,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE$1,055,486
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC$1,048,826
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$946,634
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$853,150
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$805,234
SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE$781,027
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$656,248
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CIRCLE THE CITY: $1.0M → 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $125k → 14%CURTIE CARES INC: $25k → 10%CIRCLE THE CITY: $125k → 11%HOPE AND HARBOR HOMELESS SHELTER: $20k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $23k → 14%MANKATO FAMILY YMCA: $156k → 15%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $19k → 14%CIRCLE THE CITY: $30k → 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $15k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC: $30k → 17%MANKATO YOUTH PLACE INC: $108k → 15%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC: $20k → 17%MANKATO FAMILY YMCA: $85k → 15%MISSION HOUSE INC: $20k → 14%GENERATION W INC: $14k → 14%VINE FAITH IN ACTION: $40k → 15%GENERATION W INC: $14k → 14%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $20k → 11%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ALBERT LEA MINNESOTA INC: $23k → 12%GENERATION W INC: $14k → 14%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $15k → 10%MENOMONIE AREA SENIOR CENTER: $20k → 11%FAMILY Y OF ALBERT LEA MINNESOTA INC: $23k → 12%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $15k → 10%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $15k → 10%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING FOR WESTERN WISCONSIN INC: $15k → 11%HELP IN HEALING HOME FOUNDATION INC: $55k → 11%HELP IN HEALING HOME FOUNDATION INC: $54k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC: $26k → 12%HELP IN HEALING HOME FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 11%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ALBERT LEA MINNESOTA INC: $19k → 12%FAMILY Y OF ALBERT LEA MINNESOTA INC: $18k → 12%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ALBERT LEA MINNESOTA INC: $18k → 12%2ND MILE MINISTRIES INC: $15k → 14%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ALBERT LEA MINNESOTA INC: $18k → 12%FAMILY Y OF ALBERT LEA MINNESOTA INC: $18k → 12%COMMUNITY FOOD RESPONSE: $50k → 9%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ALBERT LEA MINNESOTA INC: $18k → 12%EAU CLAIRE YMCA: $16k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC: $15k → 12%KARUNA INC: $26k → 12%EAU CLAIRE YMCA: $15k → 12%EAU CLAIRE YMCA: $14k → 12%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MANKATO: $15k → 15%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $14k → 12%KARUNA INC: $20k → 12%RETHREADED INC: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2B · 387 repeat orgs$109M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

387 repeat relationships: 207 still active in FY2024, 180 since wound down; 79 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

387
182

Total granted

$1.2B
$105M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+7%

Still filing today

66%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $5.5M · revenue +21%
  • IS
    IM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +10% · 25% of their budget
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM--FRANCISCAN HEALTHCARE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $48M
  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC
    one grant, 2019 · $34M
  • IS
    INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 535
    one grant, 2023 · $10M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
3
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
4
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
5
Burnett Medical Center Inc

The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…

Health
6
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
7
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
8
Caromont Health

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
9
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
10
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
11
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is William Beaumont Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Terasaki Inst for Biomedical Innovation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

456 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 456 of the 666 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

15
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
75
Early backer (in before they grew)
446/456
Grantees still filing
320/456
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC: $11,204,322,932 · HealthMAYO CLINIC+48 more: $29,144,241 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $510,686,069 · OtherMAYO CLINICMAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM: $278,524,095 · OtherMAYO CLINIC…MAYO CLINIC: $110,105,706 · OtherMAYO CLINICMAYO CLINIC: $94,885,745 · OtherMAYO CLINICMAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM--FRANCISCAN HEALTHCARE INC: $48,378,917 · OtherMAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM-SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN REGION INC: $44,100,667 · Other+110 more: $129,213,859 · Other+110 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $6,271,411 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5,458,489 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3,819,119 · EducationEmory University: $3,677,786 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $2,175,384 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,027,065 · Education+14 more: $5,232,032 · EducationROCHESTER AREA FOUNDATION: $13,029,000 · PhilanthropyGREAT RIVERS UNITED WAY INC: $544,521 · Philanthropy+7 more: $1,745,175 · PhilanthropyIM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $5,122,108 · Housing & ShelterHOPE VILLAGE - TINY HOUSING ALTERNATIVES INC: $208,500 · Housing & ShelterSAINT ANDREW'S LIGHTHOUSE INC: $192,500 · Housing & ShelterINSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY: $2,701,562 · Science & TechSAGE BIONETWORKS: $1,133,569 · Science & TechNEXUS FAMILY HEALING: $3,733,000 · Crime & Legal
Health$11,233,467,173Other$1,215,895,058Education$28,661,286Philanthropy$15,318,696Housing & Shelter$5,523,108Science & Tech$3,835,131Crime & Legal$3,733,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $11,204,322,932 over 8y, 30% of budgetROCHESTER AREA FOUNDATION: $13,029,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $6,271,411 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $5,880,182 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5,458,489 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $5,122,108 over 5y, 25% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3,819,119 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEXUS FAMILY HEALING: $3,733,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,687,161 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEmory University: $3,677,786 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY: $2,701,562 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetTERASAKI INST FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION: $2,428,171 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $2,175,384 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,027,065 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $1,472,362 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY: $1,468,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $1,155,359 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCIRCLE THE CITY: $1,155,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetSAGE BIONETWORKS: $1,133,569 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,113,875 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $954,138 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBaptist Healthcare System Inc: $915,943 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $880,732 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetFAIRMONT COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $871,421 over 1y, 89% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS: $832,566 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE: $827,421 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDIGNITY HEALTH: $778,215 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFORSYTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $717,027 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $712,713 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $652,163 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $606,963 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBanner Health: $583,286 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $560,274 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $558,487 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT RIVERS UNITED WAY INC: $544,521 over 8y, 6.5% of budgetARIZONA VETERANS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $512,940 over 7y, 8.9% of budgetADELANTE HEALTHCAREINC: $508,195 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $500,109 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER DOWNTOWN ALLIANCE: $500,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $492,408 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $489,245 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $485,967 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $420,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $417,407 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $403,650 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetThe Miriam Hospital: $388,681 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $386,655 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $347,964 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds IM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NEXUS FAMILY HEALING ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds TERASAKI INST FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE JACKSON LABORATORY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Mayo ClinicLa Crosse Community F…Gundersen Lutheran Ad…Otto Bremer TrustUnited Way of Northea…Jacksonville Jaguars …Eau Claire Community …The Community Foundat…Southern Baptist Hosp…Cleary-Kumm Foundatio…Southern Minnesota In…Lyche Family Foundati…
Mayo ClinicMN125.3× affinity86 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mayo Clinic · La Crosse Community Foundation · Gundersen Lutheran Administrative Services Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · United Way of Northeast Florida Inc · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Eau Claire Community Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida Inc · Cleary-Kumm Foundation Inc · Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation · Lyche Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mayo Clinic Group Return funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mayo Clinic Group Return. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine: 100% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Agape Community Health Center Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Im Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • United Way of Northeast Florida Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Adventist Healthcare Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Hartford Hospital: 0% of income from government
  • Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pga Tour Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Morton Plant Mease Health Care Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mayo Clinic Group Return?

Find your warmest path to Mayo Clinic Group Return through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 666 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mayo Clinic Group Return’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home