Skip to content
Maximum Impact Love Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Maximum Impact Love Inc

Our mission at maximum impact love is to provide to those in need, feed the hungry, send a child to school, save a life, and to do all we can to help one another in unity in the name of our lord and savior, jesus christ.

$111k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.8MHuman Services$505kEducation$202kInternational$142kHealth$140kHousing & Shelter$95kRecreation & Sports$86kYouth Development$32kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $27,076, the rows itemized in this filing. The $110,714 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $83,638 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$12,076
FRIENDSHIP BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
CALEB'S CALL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $167k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%HUMAN COALITION: $22k → 5%STREETWISE MINISTIRES: $23k → 9%HUMAN COALITION: $13k → 5%STREETWISE MINISTIRES: $12k → 9%HUMAN COALITION: $13k → 5%STREETWISE MINISTIRES: $12k → 9%HUMAN COALITION: $13k → 5%STREETWISE MINISTIRES: $12k → 9%HUMAN COALITION: $6k → 5%LAMBS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $12k → 8%STREETWISE MINISTIRES: $12k → 9%LAMBS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $12k → 8%LAMBS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 40 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
8

Total granted

$2.8M
$158k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+10158%

Still filing today

35%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GILGAL INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $128k · revenue +76%
  • FL
    FAMILY LIFE RESTORATION CENTER
    7× · 2017–2023 · $125k · revenue +26%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $95k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • MI
    MAXIMUM IMPACT INTERNATIONAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $69k
  • NC
    NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $21k · revenue ×103
  • CN
    CARE NET PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
2
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
3
Gospel Life Global Missions

Sending disciples to glorify god

—
4
Life Connections International

Ministry

Religion
5
Speaklife Ministries Inc
Arts & Culture
6
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
7
Follow Him Media Inc
Religion
8
Marketplace Leaders Ministries Inc

Provide spiritual encouragement to men and women in the workplace.

Religion
9
Bowlin Ministries Nc

Evangelist

Religion
10
Life Training Ministries Inc

Christian counseling for individuals with anxiety depression or other emotional struggles. Christian counseling for marriages and other couples.

Human Services
11
Heartlife Ministries

Establish and oversee places of worship, conduct evangelism worldwide, create departments necessary to support missions & outreach activities license and oversee ministers of the gospel,

Human Services
12
Tim Case International Ministries Inc
International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fellowship of Christian Athletes; the most unlike its peers is Franklin H Coleman Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDSHIP BAPTIST CHURCH: $290,000 · OtherFRIENDSHIP BAPTIST CHURCHVICTORY OUTREACH INC: $154,300 · OtherVICTORY OUTREACH INCNEW BIRTH OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $151,800 · OtherNEW BIRTH OUTREACH MINISTRIES INCFAMILY LIFE RESTORATION CENTER: $125,000 · OtherFAMILY LIFE RESTORATION CENTERNATIONAL CAMPUS FUND: $97,000 · OtherABBA FATHER INSTITUTE: $86,500 · OtherSTANDING ANGEL MINISTRIES: $70,300 · OtherKEEPIN IT REAL LIGHTHOUSE: $69,300 · OtherMAXIMUM IMPACT INTERNATIONAL CHURCH: $68,722 · Other+27 more: $947,576 · Other+27 moreMARKETPLACE MISSIONS INC: $78,800 · ReligionMARKETPLACE MI…LIFELINE INTERNATIONAL INC: $73,000 · ReligionLIFELINE INTER…FRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $65,300 · ReligionFRONTLINE RESP…FRANKLIN H COLEMAN MINISTRIES INC: $62,600 · ReligionFRANKLIN H COL…Wellspring Living Inc: $60,300 · ReligionWellspring Liv…Regenerating Life Ministries Inc: $52,800 · ReligionRegenerating L…+1 more: $5,000 · ReligionSTREETWISE GEORGIA INC: $70,500 · Human ServicesHUMAN COALITION: $65,500 · Human ServicesLAMBS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $45,600 · Human ServicesGILGAL INC: $127,500 · HealthNATIONAL CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $94,800 · Housing & ShelterFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $86,300 · Youth DevelopmentSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $59,800 · Education
Other$2,060,498Religion$397,800Human Services$181,600Health$127,500Housing & Shelter$94,800Youth Development$86,300Education$59,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGILGAL INC: $127,500 over 7y, 6.4% of budgetFAMILY LIFE RESTORATION CENTER: $125,000 over 7y, 18% of budgetNATIONAL CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $94,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $86,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARKETPLACE MISSIONS INC: $78,800 over 7y, 50% of budgetLIFELINE INTERNATIONAL INC: $73,000 over 7y, 7.9% of budgetSTREETWISE GEORGIA INC: $70,500 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetHUMAN COALITION: $65,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $65,300 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetBASIC GOSPEL INC: $64,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetFRANKLIN H COLEMAN MINISTRIES INC: $62,600 over 4y, 85% of budgetWellspring Living Inc: $60,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $59,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Evangelism Foundation Inc: $56,300 over 5y, 22% of budgetSHINING LIGHT MINISTRIES INC: $54,800 over 6y, 11% of budgetRegenerating Life Ministries Inc: $52,800 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetLAMBS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $45,600 over 4y, 13% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $12,076 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE THRIVES NPO INC: $11,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCALEBS CALL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GILGAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY LIFE RESTORATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds MARKETPLACE MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds STREETWISE GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN COALITION ↗
  • Who funds FRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BASIC GOSPEL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN H COLEMAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Wellspring Living Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds World Evangelism Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHINING LIGHT MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Regenerating Life Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAMBS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA13.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maximum Impact Love Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maximum Impact Love Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Maximum Impact Love Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Maximum Impact Love Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maximum Impact Love’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home