Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Maxi Fuxjager Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2021
0%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 8
FY2017 to FY2021
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$9k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 0% of the organizations Maxi Fuxjager Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
EnvironmentInternationalEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving1$10k100%
FY20211$10k0%
FY20203$68k0%
FY20192$25k100%
FY20188$230k88%
FY20172$20kn/a
88% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$140kInternational$83kArts & Culture$53kCrime & Legal$20kYouth Development$10kCivil Rights$10kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Kingston Model Railroad Club Inc$53,0002n/a
Ecpat-Usa Inc$50,00017%
Grand Staircase - Escalante Partners Inc$35,00013%
Utah Dine Bikeyah$35,00014%
Friends of Gold Butte$35,0001n/a
Big Bend Conservation Alliance$35,000122%
Children First Inc$32,50030%
First Step Incorporated$20,000257%
Lee & Bob Peterson Foundation Inc Dba Sunshine From Darkness$10,00013%
El Puente de Williamsburg Inc$10,00010%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($47k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Maxi Fuxjager Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEcpat-Usa Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetGrand Staircase - Escalante Partners Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetUtah Dine Bikeyah: $35,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetBig Bend Conservation Alliance: $35,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetChildren First Inc: $32,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFirst Step Incorporated: $20,000 over 2y, 57% of budgetLee & Bob Peterson Foundation Inc Dba Sunshine From Darkness: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetEl Puente de Williamsburg Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgCA15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Maxi Fuxjager Foundation with peer funders

About Maxi Fuxjager Foundation

How much does Maxi Fuxjager Foundation give?
Maxi Fuxjager Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $10,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 8 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2021.
What does Maxi Fuxjager Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (39%), International (23%), Arts & Culture (15%).
Who are Maxi Fuxjager Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Kingston Model Railroad Club Inc ($53k), Ecpat-Usa Inc ($50k), Grand Staircase - Escalante Partners Inc ($35k).
Does Maxi Fuxjager Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Maxi Fuxjager Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Maxi Fuxjager Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Patagoniaorg, Network for Good, National Philanthropic Trust.
Where is Maxi Fuxjager Foundation based?
Maxi Fuxjager Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Maxi Fuxjager’s filings →

More from the funding graph