Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Max & Pauline Zimmer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$272k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$946kReligion$577kHuman Services$480kHealth$386kArts & Culture$185kYouth Development$111kEducation$97kCivil Rights$51kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $233k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASORTI FOUNDATION$30,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$25,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENT$22,500
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$20,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHET EILON$20,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND INC$20,000
CAMP RAMAH$15,000
WEST SIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENTD CIR$10,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$10,000
AMERICAN ASSOC BEN-GURION UNIVERSIT$10,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$10,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR MENTAL ILLNES$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $559k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VISTA DEL MAR: $10k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $5k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $5k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $5k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $5k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $5k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $5k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $5k → 14%SISTAHFRIENDS: $35k → 14%SISTAHFRIENDS: $35k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $35k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENT: $25k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $35k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENT: $25k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENT: $25k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENT: $25k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENT: $25k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $23k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENT: $25k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENT: $25k → 14%WEST SIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENT: $25k → 14%WEST SIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENT: $23k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 29 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
3

Total granted

$1.9M
$22k

Still filing today

41%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterHealthEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WJ
    WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $223k · revenue +85%
  • SC
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $223k · revenue +30%
  • CR
    CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • AH
    AMIRIM HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • CS
    CALIF STATE UNIV NORTHRIDGE
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • EC
    EARLHAM COLLEGE THEATER ARTS PROGRA
    one grant, 2024 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
2
The Jewish Agency - American Section Inc

The jewish agency-american section, inc. (jaas) was organized to work with and in support of non profit organizations active in the fields of immigration and absorption in israel; youth care and training; teaching of hebrew and jewish…

Human Services
3
Kivunim

Creating, organizing and administering student and educator educational programs regarding the state of israel and/or other jewish communities throughout the world, through the sponsorship of limited duration group educator and student…

Education
4
Jewish Institute for the Blind (Jerusalem) Inc

To educate, enrich and empower visually impaired people across israel to achieve their full potential and become contributing members of society.

International
5
Sherit Isroel
6
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
7
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
8
The Aish School - Azriel Aharon

The aish school was created to provide jewish adult education in a non judgmental, apolitical, and inspiring way. the aish school offers classes in most areas of jewish life and culture, including but not limited to: jewish law, history,…

Religion
9
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

10
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
11
American Council for World Jewry Inc

Founded so jews, worldwide, can join together in partnership, ensuring our common good and coolective survival. the council acts in the belief that the key to successfully countering threats against the jewish people and the state if…

Civil Rights
12
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westside Jewish Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nami National. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $946,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHET EILON INC — $180,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHET EILON INC+2 more — $6,000 · PhilanthropyMASORTI FOUNDATION CONSERVATIVE JUD — $280,000 · OtherMASORTI FOUNDATION CONSERVATIVE JUDMASORTI FOUNDATION FOR CONSERVATIVE JUDAISM IN ISRAEL — $150,000 · OtherMASORTI FOUNDATION FOR CONSERVATIVE JUDA…CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC — $135,000 · OtherCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INCJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $127,000 · OtherJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATIONJEWISH BIG BROTHERS SISTERS — $53,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF PARENTS CIRCLE — $46,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF BEN GURION U — $34,000 · Other+16 more — $192,000 · Other+16 moreWESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $222,500 · Human ServicesWESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUN…SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER — $222,500 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CO…SISTAHFRIENDS — $70,000 · Human ServicesSISTAHFRIENDSVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $44,000 · Human ServicesVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AN…Trauma Resource Institute Inc — $98,000 · Public Safety & DisasterAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $17,000 · EducationNAMI National — $10,000 · HealthJUDAISM BY CHOICE INC — $4,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$1,132,000Other$1,017,500Human Services$559,000Public Safety & Disaster$98,000Education$17,000Health$10,000Religion$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $946,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $222,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER — $222,500 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHET EILON INC — $180,000 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC — $135,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $127,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTrauma Resource Institute Inc — $98,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetSISTAHFRIENDS — $70,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $44,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI National — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDAISM BY CHOICE INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERIT SPREAD FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC
  • Who funds WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHET EILON INC
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Trauma Resource Institute Inc
  • Who funds SISTAHFRIENDS
  • Who funds VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NAMI National
  • Who funds JUDAISM BY CHOICE INC
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC
  • Who funds MERIT SPREAD FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Max & Pauline Zimmer Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Max & Pauline Zimmer Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Max & Pauline Zimmer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph