Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Maude Pritchard Char Trust Xxxxx2009

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$944k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Health$920kArts & Culture$589kPhilanthropy$560kEnvironment$505kCrime & Legal$500kEducation$500kHuman Services$430kFood & Nutrition$345kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $144k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $800k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC$100,000
NEW HOUR FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN$100,000
NURSING SISTERS HOME CARE$100,000
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$100,000
BANK STREET COLLEGE$100,000
UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND$50,000
HERSTORY WRITERS WORKSHOP INC$50,000
WYANDANCH HOMES AND PROPERTY$50,000
NEW SCHOOL UNIVERSITY$50,000
DOCS FOR TOTS$50,000
HEALTH AND WELFARE COUNCIL OF$50,000
THE HECKSCHER MUSEUM OF ART$34,000
ST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$30,000
THREE VILLAGE MEALS ON WHEELS INC$30,000
COMMUNITY ACTION SOUTHOLD TOWN INC$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $505k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DOCS FOR TOTS: $50k → 13%HELEN KELLER SERVICES HKSB: $30k → 20%THE SAFE CENTER LI INC: $50k → 6%DOCS FOR TOTS: $50k → 13%ISLAND HARVEST LTD: $50k → 6%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%DOCS FOR TOTS: $50k → 6%DOCS FOR TOTS: $50k → 6%LIGHT HOUSE MISSION OUTREACH INC: $25k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $50k → 7%FAMILY SERVICES LEAGUE INC: $50k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.0M · 23 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
18

Total granted

$4.0M
$875k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+10%

Still filing today

65%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEW HOUR FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN LI I
    5× · 2021–2025 · $450k · revenue +155%
  • THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
    5× · 2021–2025 · $425k · revenue +109%
  • SB
    STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $250k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD HOSPICE CATHOLIC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • SC
    ST CHARLES HOSPITAL CORP
    one grant, 2023 · $90k · revenue +10%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Island Community Hospital At Nyu Langone Health

The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…

—
2
Health and Welfare Council of Long Island Inc

Serve the most vulnerable on li by convening and supporting agencies that serve them

Health
3
Long Island Partnership Clt Housing Development Fund Company Inc

Long island partnership clt housing development fund company, inc. (lipclt) was established to provide housing within nassau and suffolk counties in new york for "persons of low income", as defined in any federal or state low income…

Housing & Shelter
4
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
5
Chs Services Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
6
Long Island Medical Foundation Inc Dba Nuhealth Foundation

Long island medical foundation (limf) is the not-for-profit philanthropic arm of the nassau health care corporation. limf is devoted to inspire philanthropic support for the nassau university medical center, a. holly patterson skilled…

Health
7
Nursing Sisters Home Care Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
8
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
Long Island Housing Partnership Inc

Long island housing partnership, inc. (lihp) was created to address the need for and to provide affordable housing opportunities on long island for those who are unable to afford homes, through development, technical assistance, mortgage…

Housing & Shelter
10
Mercy Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
11
Nassau Suffolk Hospital Council Inc

& part iii, line 1: the mission of the nassau-suffolk hospital council, inc. (nshc) is to:- provide a forum for the exchange of ideas regarding the development of regional, state, and national health policy,- identify key policy issues…

—
12
Long Island University

To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Health System of Long Island and the most unlike its peers is Herstory Writers Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCatholic Health Care SystemsCommunity Arts CentersPhysician Practice GroupsJewish Community SupportEarly Childhood Care & Educ…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr21%11%10–20yr20%31%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr14%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr21%16%10–20yr20%28%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr14%25%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
10%
3,821/36,694

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
22/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HEALTH AND WELFARE COUNCIL OF — $350,000 · OtherHEALTH AND WELFARE COUNCIL OFUNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND — $220,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF LONG ISLANDCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHOLD TOWN INC — $205,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHOLD TOWN INCBANK STREET COLLEGE — $200,000 · OtherBANK STREET COLLEGEST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $175,000 · OtherST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCHVANDERBILT MUSEUM — $150,000 · OtherVANDERBILT MUSEUMWYANDANCH HOMES AND PROPERTY — $141,000 · OtherCATHOLIC HEALTH SYSTEM OF LONG ISLAND — $100,000 · OtherLONG ISLAND GAY AND LESBIAN YOUTH INC — $100,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD HOSPICE CATHOLIC — $100,000 · OtherACTION EAST INC (ASCENDUS) — $100,000 · OtherTHREE VILLAGE MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $175,000 · OtherTHREE VILLAGE MEALS ON WHEELS INCMercy Haven Inc — $150,000 · OtherMercy Haven IncTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $90,000 · Other+9 more — $420,000 · Other+9 moreTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $425,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST F…Seatuck Environmental Association Inc — $80,000 · EnvironmentSeatuck Env…DOCS FOR TOTS — $200,000 · Human ServicesDOCS FOR TO…FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERV…The Safe Center LI Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesThe Safe Ce…ISLAND HARVEST LTD — $50,000 · Human ServicesISLAND HARV…Long Island Cares Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesLong Island…TIDES CENTER — $50,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTE…Helen Keller Services — $30,000 · Human ServicesHelen Kelle…LIGHTHOUSE MISSION OUTREACH INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesNEW HOUR FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN LI I — $450,000 · Crime & LegalNEW HOUR …STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 · EducationSTONY BRO…PROJECT MOST INC — $100,000 · EducationPROJECT M…Middle Country Library Foundation Inc — $50,000 · EducationMiddle Co…The New School — $50,000 · EducationThe New S…HERSTORY WRITERS NETWORK INC — $150,000 · Arts & CultureHECKSCHER MUSEUM — $84,000 · Arts & CultureHAMPTONS COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureSUFFOLK COUNTY VANDERBILT MUSEUM — $50,000 · Arts & CultureLONG ISLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $30,000 · Arts & CultureBROOKHAVEN HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORP — $100,000 · HealthST CHARLES HOSPITAL CORP — $90,000 · HealthOPTIONS FOR COMMUNITY LIVING INC — $30,000 · Health
Other$2,676,000Environment$505,000Human Services$505,000Crime & Legal$450,000Education$450,000Arts & Culture$364,000Health$220,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW HOUR FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN LI I — $450,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $425,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND — $220,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHOLD TOWN INC — $205,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetDOCS FOR TOTS — $200,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetTHREE VILLAGE MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $175,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetMercy Haven Inc — $150,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHERSTORY WRITERS NETWORK INC — $150,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetBROOKHAVEN HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORP — $100,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetPROJECT MOST INC — $100,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST CHARLES HOSPITAL CORP — $90,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHECKSCHER MUSEUM — $84,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetSeatuck Environmental Association Inc — $80,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Safe Center LI Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMiddle Country Library Foundation Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAMPTONS COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC — $50,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetLong Island Cares Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe New School — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLa Fuerza Unida Community Development Corporation — $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSUFFOLK COUNTY VANDERBILT MUSEUM — $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHEALTHRIGHT INTERNATIONAL INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF HUNTINGTON TOWNSHIP CORP — $40,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetHelen Keller Services — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLONG ISLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFARMS FOR CITY KIDS FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOPTIONS FOR COMMUNITY LIVING INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE FARMS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Communit…Mother Cabrini Health…The Marilyn Lichtman …Td Charitable Foundat…Frank J Antun Foundat…New York Community Ba…Sunshine FoundationJewish Communal FundPseg Foundation IncInvestors Foundation …Raymond J and Mary C …The Claire Friedlande…
The New York Community TrustNY38.8× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Marilyn Lichtman Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Frank J Antun Foundation · New York Community Bank Foundation · Sunshine Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Pseg Foundation Inc · Investors Foundation Inc · Raymond J and Mary C Reisert Foundation Inc · The Claire Friedlander Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Maude Pritchard Char Trust Xxxxx2009 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home