Skip to content
Mattingly Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mattingly Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$62kPhilanthropy$55kYouth Development$39kHealth$32kHuman Services$30kReligion$20kRecreation & Sports$17kCommunity Improvement$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$77k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION$16,667
BISHOP ROSECRANS HIGH SCHOOL$5,901
MUSKINGUM COUNTY 4-H$4,107
FOREVER DADS$3,050
NEWARK CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$3,000
LICKING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,500
NORTH NEWARK LITTLE LEAGUE$2,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LICKING COUNTY$1,000
BISHOPS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION$1,000
NEWARK CATHOLIC ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION$750
TRINWAY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TERESA MCCORMICK CENTER: $1k → 13%FOREVER DADS: $8k → 14%FOREVER DADS: $5k → 14%FOREVER DADS: $3k → 14%FOREVER DADS: $3k → 14%FOREVER DADS: $3k → 14%FOREVER DADS: $3k → 14%FOREVER DADS: $3k → 14%ST FRANCIS DE SALES: $2k → 10%ST FRANCIS DE SALES: $2k → 10%ST FRANCIS DE SALES: $2k → 10%FOREVER DADS: $700 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$271k · 23 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
24

Total granted

$271k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+2%

Still filing today

26%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • F
    FOREVERDADS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +66%
  • ND
    NEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS
    2× · 2018–2020 · $8k · revenue +252%
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS DESALES
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • TK
    THE KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +2%
  • CO
    CITY OF NEWARK
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • PC
    PERRYTON CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muncie-Delaware County Chamber of Commerce

To be an action-oriented, visionary organization which will stimulate progress, foster economic growth and enhance individual opportunity to achieve a high quality of life for everyone.

—
2
Ohio County Community Foundation Inc

The foundation was organized to provide responsible stewardship of donated gifts to provide leadership in addressing community issues and to make grants in the fields of community service, education, health, environment and the arts in the…

Philanthropy
3
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
4
Muncie Sports Commission Inc

The muncie sports commission exists to attract, create, host, and support sporting events and recreational opportunities for delaware county, indiana.

Recreation & Sports
5
Ohio Debate Commission Inc

Our mission is to foster fair and substantive debates that encourage participation in our democracy, and our vision is of a stronger Ohio, with well informed voters and highly qualified public servants, candidates, and elected officials.

Civil Rights
6
The Greater Cincinnati Film Commission

The Greater Cincinnati Film Commission is dedicated to maximizing the area's economic potential by attracting, promoting and cultivating film, television, and commercial production throughout Greater Cincinnati. Once filmmakers choose…

—
7
American Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio

To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…

—
8
Delaware County Foundation

Strengthening the community by connecting people through charitable giving

Philanthropy
9
The Northern Cincinnai Foundation

Transforming generosity into impact by encouraging, supporting, and facilitating philanthropy to create more vibrant communities in northern cincinnati.

Philanthropy
10
The Falls of the Ohio Foundation

To inspire a sense of wonder in the falls of the ohio region through education, preservation, and exploration.

Environment
11
Delaware County Economic Development Corporation

To promote new business and assist existing businesses in delaware county, pa to create employment opportunities

—
12
Ohio District Kiwanis Foundation Inc

The mission of the ohio district kiwanis foundation is to raise, manage, and distribute funds to support programs of ohio district kiwanis family organizations for the improvement of lives of individuals. the focus will be fundraising and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Muskingum County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Malouf Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $53,334 · OtherTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATIONBISHOP ROSECRANS HIGH SCHOOL: $32,734 · OtherBISHOP ROSECRANS HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $25,446 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGENESIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $17,707 · OtherGENESIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LICKING COUNTY: $14,534 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LICKING COUNTYLICKING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $14,500 · OtherLICKING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONMUSKINGUM COUNTY 4-H: $14,010 · OtherMUSKINGUM COUNTY 4-HNEWARK CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $13,370 · OtherNEWARK CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLST FRANCIS DE SALES PARISH: $11,000 · OtherNorth Newark Little League: $9,300 · Other+28 more: $36,118 · Other+28 moreFOREVERDADS: $29,331 · Human ServicesFOREVERDADSST FRANCIS DESALES: $4,900 · Human ServicesST FRANCIS DE…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationZANE STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,500 · EducationNEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS: $7,948 · Community ImprovementTHE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY: $1,550 · Arts & CultureRECREATION UNLIMITED FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsMalouf Foundation: $600 · PhilanthropyTHE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $600 · PhilanthropyBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC: $500 · Youth DevelopmentLIFEWISE INC: $200 · Youth Development
Other$242,053Human Services$35,231Education$11,500Community Improvement$7,948Arts & Culture$1,550Recreation & Sports$1,500Philanthropy$1,200Youth Development$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOREVERDADS: $29,331 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetTHE KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetNorth Newark Little League: $9,300 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetNEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS: $7,948 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetST FRANCIS DESALES: $4,900 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTHE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY: $1,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZANE STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRECREATION UNLIMITED FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTERESA MCCORMICK CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMalouf Foundation: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLICKING COUNTY COURTHOUSE LIGHTING COMMITTEE INC: $300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEWISE INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOREVERDADS ↗
  • Who funds THE KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds North Newark Little League ↗
  • Who funds NEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS DESALES ↗
  • Who funds THE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds ZANE STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RECREATION UNLIMITED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TERESA MCCORMICK CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Malouf Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Park National Corpora…Licking County Founda…The Gilbert Reese Fam…The Patricia R and He…Licking Memorial Heal…Energy Cooperative Ro…The Foundation of the…Nisource Charitable F…Columbus FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…
Park National Corporation FoundationOH19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Park National Corporation Foundation · Licking County Foundation Inc · The Gilbert Reese Family Foundation · The Patricia R and Herbert J Murphy Foundation · Licking Memorial Health Foundation · Energy Cooperative Roundup Foundation Inc · The Foundation of the Catholic Diocese of Columbus · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mattingly Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mattingly Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mattingly Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home