· Private foundation
Mattingly Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION | $16,667 |
| BISHOP ROSECRANS HIGH SCHOOL | $5,901 |
| MUSKINGUM COUNTY 4-H | $4,107 |
| FOREVER DADS | $3,050 |
| NEWARK CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| LICKING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| NORTH NEWARK LITTLE LEAGUE | $2,000 |
| BISHOPS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LICKING COUNTY | $1,000 |
| NEWARK CATHOLIC ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION | $750 |
| TRINWAY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFOREVERDADS8× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +66%
- NDNEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS2× · 2018–2020 · $8k · revenue +252%
- SFST FRANCIS DESALES3× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- TKTHE KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +2%
- COCITY OF NEWARKone grant, 2018 · $3k
- PCPERRYTON CHURCH OF CHRISTone grant, 2022 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To be an action-oriented, visionary organization which will stimulate progress, foster economic growth and enhance individual opportunity to achieve a high quality of life for everyone.
The foundation was organized to provide responsible stewardship of donated gifts to provide leadership in addressing community issues and to make grants in the fields of community service, education, health, environment and the arts in the…
Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.
The muncie sports commission exists to attract, create, host, and support sporting events and recreational opportunities for delaware county, indiana.
Our mission is to foster fair and substantive debates that encourage participation in our democracy, and our vision is of a stronger Ohio, with well informed voters and highly qualified public servants, candidates, and elected officials.
The Greater Cincinnati Film Commission is dedicated to maximizing the area's economic potential by attracting, promoting and cultivating film, television, and commercial production throughout Greater Cincinnati. Once filmmakers choose…
To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…
Strengthening the community by connecting people through charitable giving
Transforming generosity into impact by encouraging, supporting, and facilitating philanthropy to create more vibrant communities in northern cincinnati.
To inspire a sense of wonder in the falls of the ohio region through education, preservation, and exploration.
To promote new business and assist existing businesses in delaware county, pa to create employment opportunities
The mission of the ohio district kiwanis foundation is to raise, manage, and distribute funds to support programs of ohio district kiwanis family organizations for the improvement of lives of individuals. the focus will be fundraising and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Muskingum County Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Malouf Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOREVERDADS ↗
- Who funds THE KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds North Newark Little League ↗
- Who funds NEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS DESALES ↗
- Who funds THE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds ZANE STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RECREATION UNLIMITED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TERESA MCCORMICK CENTER ↗
- Who funds Malouf Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Park National Corporation Foundation · Licking County Foundation Inc · The Gilbert Reese Family Foundation · The Patricia R and Herbert J Murphy Foundation · Licking Memorial Health Foundation · Energy Cooperative Roundup Foundation Inc · The Foundation of the Catholic Diocese of Columbus · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mattingly Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.