Skip to content

· Private foundation

Massey Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$5.0MEducation$2.4MRecreation & Sports$758kHealth$186kYouth Development$153kArts & Culture$99kCivil Rights$80kHuman Services$53kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.7M
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$44M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VICTORY LIFE CHURCH$1,000,000
SOSU FOUNDATION$750,000
SIGMA CHI FOUNDATION$640,000
SOSU FOUNDATION$300,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$84,660
AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$25,000
OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME$25,000
MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE$20,000
FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE$20,000
FOLDS OF HONOR$20,000
EAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$15,005
J127 MINISTRY$15,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH DURANT$10,000
PREGNANCY CENTER OF BRYAN COUNTY$10,000
OKLAHOMA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNDER HIS WINGS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.4M · 14 repeat orgs$947k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
21

Total granted

$8.4M
$217k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+25%

Still filing today

57%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $730k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureSocial ScienceCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    5× · 2019–2023 · $796k · revenue +90%
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2025 · $175k · revenue +48%
  • FL
    FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $80k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • FB
    FIRST BAPTISH CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • SF
    SE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
The Oklahoma United Methodist Foundation

To create and administer permanent charitable endowments to strengthen Methodist ministries in Oklahoma.

—
5
Northwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc and Alumni Association

To provide support to NWOSU and scholarships to NWOSU students

Education
6
Ouachita Baptist University

Ouachita baptist university is a christ-centered learning community. embracing the liberal arts tradition, the university prepares individuals for ongoing intellectual and spiritual growth, lives of meaningful work, and reasoned engagement…

Education
7
Toccoa Falls College Inc

The mission of Toccoa Falls College is to glorify God through seeking and developing Christian servant leaders who will impact their world with the love and message of Jesus Christ.

Education
8
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
9
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
10
Eastern Oklahoma State College Development Foundation Inc

The Foundation's primary purpose is to provide resources and to seek external support for scholarships, faculty development, equipment, and campus projects, which support Eastern Oklahoma State College, a community college in Southeast…

Education
11
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
12
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Under His Wings. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VICTORY LIFE CHURCH: $4,950,000 · OtherVICTORY LIFE CHURCHSOSU FOUNDATION: $1,474,125 · OtherSOSU FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $600,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+27 more: $452,985 · Other+27 moreOklahoma State University Foundation: $796,398 · EducationOklahoma State Unive…Sigma Chi Foundation: $640,000 · EducationSigma Chi FoundationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $175,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUND…OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $63,500 · Education+2 more: $20,000 · EducationTEXOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $168,750 · HealthPregnancy Center of Bryan County Inc: $15,000 · Health+1 more: $2,500 · HealthFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $80,000 · Civil RightsOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $51,500 · Arts & CultureOklahoma Shakespearean Festival: $2,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $25,000 · Social ScienceOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$7,477,110Education$1,694,898Health$186,250Civil Rights$80,000Arts & Culture$54,000Social Science$25,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $796,398 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSigma Chi Foundation: $640,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $175,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTEXOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $168,750 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $63,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $51,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE BIBLE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,005 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPregnancy Center of Bryan County Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTEXOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $7,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnder His Wings: $5,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTOGETHER WE THRIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Shakespearean Festival: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Sigma Chi Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds EAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Center of Bryan County Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEXOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds J127 Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds Under His Wings ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER WE THRIVE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Shakespearean Festival ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texoma Community FoundationTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texoma Community Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Massey Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Massey Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Massey Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph