Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Massachusetts Society for Aiding Discharged Prisoners

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$298kCrime & Legal$260kHousing & Shelter$103kCivil Rights$61kReligion$54kHealth$38kInternational$25kCommunity Improvement$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$362k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STRAIGHT AHEAD MINISTRIES$30,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
PLACE OF PROMISE$15,000
NEW ENGLAND AFTERCARE MINISTRIES$8,000
UNITED BAPTIST CHURCH$7,000
BOSTON RESCUE MISSION$5,000
BOSTON COLLABORATIVE$5,000
LIFE AFTER PRISON$2,500
FATHERS' UPLIFT INC$2,500
PEOPLE AFFECTING COMMUNITY CHANGE (PACC GLOBAL)$2,500
HIGHROCK CHURCH$2,500
PARTAKERS INC$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIFE AFTER PRISON: $3k → 11%FATHERS' UPLIFT INC: $25k → 16%FATHERS' UPLIFT INC: $13k → 16%FATHERS' UPLIFT INC: $5k → 16%FATHERS' UPLIFT INC: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$830k · 15 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$830k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
0%

Still filing today

47%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Straight Ahead Ministries INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $215k · revenue +35%
  • NE
    New England Aftercare Ministries Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $123k · revenue +35%
  • BR
    BOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $103k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • BD
    BOSTON DREAM CENTER CORP
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -63%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PRISONERS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • SO
    sisterhood on the move
    one grant, 2017 · $250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Remnant Ministries Inc

Restore inmates and those addicted back in to society

Religion
2
Brookshire New Birth Ministries

To provide a transitional living faclity for battered women, women released from prison and women rehabing from drug addiction

Human Services
3
Recovery Ministries Inc
Religion
4
Prison to Purpose

The organization is to reinvent, rehabilitates,and formulate as a support. group for individuals out of the prison system Also offers job assistance.

Crime & Legal
5
Bridge Prison Ministry

A faith-based ministry that serves inmates preparing to transition from incarceration to successful restoration into the community, family & reconciliation to god.

Human Services
6
Prison in the Wild Inc

Provide ministry to inmates

7
Friends House Ministries Inc

To assist former prisoners to transition into society successully

Housing & Shelter
8
Promising People Missions Inc

Promising People Missions is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization committed to aiding transitioning citizens in overcoming re-entry obstacles by facilitating access to support services, connecting them with faith-based organizations,…

Crime & Legal
9
Prison Discipleship Inc

Our 12 chaplains conduct group and individual bible studies and training to cover over 15,000 men and women in city, county and state facilities.

10
Next Door Ministries

The organization's purpose is to provide resources for men taking the next steps from recovery to a sustainable lifestyle. Our goal is to create a path to success for men struggling with a broken life pattern by providing a Christ-centered…

Religion
11
Broken Lives Ministry

We are having tremendous sucess treating men and women with drug and alcohol adductions. We are using work programs in a concentrated christian envorinment. WE are presently housing 87 men and 22 women in seperate ficilities.

Religion
12
Broken Chains Jail & Prison Ministry Inc

To help our clients recover from incarceration and homelessness, while providing programming that will empower individuals to become employed, have a bridge out of poverty, become self sufficient and overcome substance abuse, domestic…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Place of Promise Inc and the most unlike its peers is Prison Prevention Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

New England Aftercare Ministries Inc — $123,000 · OtherNew England Aftercare Ministries IncTHE SALVATION ARMY — $110,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYVISION NEW ENGLAND — $61,125 · OtherVISION NEW ENGLANDIndividual grant recipient — $50,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBridge to Hope — $25,000 · OtherBridge to HopeBOSTON DREAM CENTER CORP — $20,000 · OtherUNITED BAPTIST CHURCH — $14,500 · Other+6 more — $20,950 · OtherStraight Ahead Ministries INC — $215,000 · ReligionStraight Ahead Ministries INCPLACE OF PROMISE INC — $25,000 · ReligionPLACE OF PROMISE INC+1 more — $7,500 · ReligionBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC — $102,500 · Housing & ShelterBOSTON RESCUE…FATHERS UPLIFT INCORPORATED — $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE LIFE AFTER PRISON INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesPrison Prevention Ministries Inc — $33,500 · Crime & LegalPARTAKERS INC — $2,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$425,175Religion$247,500Housing & Shelter$102,500Human Services$47,500Crime & Legal$36,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetStraight Ahead Ministries INC — $215,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetNew England Aftercare Ministries Inc — $123,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC — $102,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetFATHERS UPLIFT INCORPORATED — $45,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetPrison Prevention Ministries Inc — $33,500 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetPLACE OF PROMISE INC — $25,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetBOSTON DREAM CENTER CORP — $20,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBOSTON COLLABORATIVE INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LIFE AFTER PRISON INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPARTAKERS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Straight Ahead Ministries INC
  • Who funds New England Aftercare Ministries Inc
  • Who funds BOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds FATHERS UPLIFT INCORPORATED
  • Who funds Prison Prevention Ministries Inc
  • Who funds PLACE OF PROMISE INC
  • Who funds BOSTON DREAM CENTER CORP
  • Who funds BOSTON COLLABORATIVE INC
  • Who funds THE LIFE AFTER PRISON INC
  • Who funds PARTAKERS INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PRISONERS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Gardiner Howland Shaw Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Massachusetts Society for Aiding Discharged Prisoners funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 27%
  • Partakers Inc59% of income from government
  • Straight Ahead Ministries Inc27% of income from government
  • Fathers Uplift Incorporated22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Massachusetts Society for Aiding Discharged Prisoners?

Find your warmest path to Massachusetts Society for Aiding Discharged Prisoners through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph