· Private foundation
Gardiner Howland Shaw Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k21 grants · $102k
- $10k–50k51 grants · $800k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY RESOURCES FOR JUSTICE | $70,000 |
| PRISONERS LEGAL SERVICES | $30,000 |
| WORCESTER COMMON GROUND | $30,000 |
| CENTER FOR LAW BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR | $25,000 |
| CITIZENS FOR JUVENILE JUSTICE | $25,000 |
| MASS INC | $22,500 |
| NEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT | $20,000 |
| EMERSON COLLEGE | $20,000 |
| OLD COLONY YMCA | $20,000 |
| CLARK UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| PETEY GREENE PROGRAM | $20,000 |
| RFK COMMUNITY ALLIANCE | $20,000 |
| ONE CAN HELP INC | $20,000 |
| SECOND CHANCE CARS | $20,000 |
| TRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $929k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
110 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2025, 57 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRCOMMUNITY RESOURCES FOR JUSTICE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $632k · revenue +110%
CITIZENS FOR JUVENILE JUSTICE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $288k · revenue +48%- GBGREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $175k · revenue +120%
Funded once
- PMPHOENIX MULTISPORT INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue +263%
- PLPRISON LEGAL SERVICESone grant, 2021 · $33k
- MIMA INSTITUTE FOR A NEW COMMONWEALTHone grant, 2020 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To employ, train, and empower youth to, in collaboration with adults, create peace, equity, and justice.
Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…
To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.
The purpose and mission of community counseling of bristol county, inc. (ccbc) is to develop and deliver compassionate, responsive, culturally competent, and quality mental health and substance abuse services to meet the…
Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.
The organization is a non-profit agency building community by providing services that promote accountability, dignity and restoration for people affected by criminal justice system.
Mfhc is committed to ending systemic housing discrimination and creating inclusive communities through education, outreach, advocacy, housing counseling and enforcement.
The mission of the roundtable is to make massachusetts the most desirable place to live, work and do business by engaging private sector executives and public leaders to ensure access to a robust, diverse and talented workforce that…
The mission of the massachusetts nonprofit network is to unite and strengthen the nonprofit sector in the commonwealth through public policy, public awareness, and capacity building services.
To empower individuals from diverse communities to find employment and build careers, while partnering with employers to hire, develop, and retain productive workforces.
The massachusetts legal assistance corporation provides leadership and support to improve civil legal services to low-income people in massachusetts through collaboration with the legal services community, the legislature, the public, the…
Massachusetts children's alliance pioneers the most promising, leading-edge ways that help victims of child abuse.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families for Justice As Healing Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ithrive Games Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
121 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 121 of the 197 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCES FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS FOR JUVENILE JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds The Petey Greene Program Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ADVOCACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS CORRECTIONAL LEGAL SERVICES INC DBA PRISONERS' LEGAL SVCS ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER COMMON GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds NEADS INC ↗
- Who funds EMERSON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND INNOCENCE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Prison Policy Initiative ↗
- Who funds ROBERT F KENNEDY CHILDREN'S ACTION CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds DOC WAYNE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW GARDEN SOCIETY LTD ↗
- Who funds MOTHERS FOR JUSTICE AND EQUALITY INC ↗
- Who funds Straight Ahead Ministries INC ↗
- Who funds THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE FOR A NEW COMMONWEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds STRATEGIES FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds ONE CAN HELP INC ↗
- Who funds MORE THAN WORDS INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH LAW ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND CHANCE CARS INC ↗
- Who funds TRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS INC ↗
- Who funds MERRIMACK COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ADOLESCENT CONSULTATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Everyday Boston Inc ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds BROCKTON INTERFAITH COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds SARITA AND CLAIRE WRIGHT LUCAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOR RESTORATIVE JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds Self Esteem Boston Educational Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S TRUST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Children's Hospital Corporation · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · The Philanthropy Connection Inc · Barr Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gardiner Howland Shaw Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lawrence Family Development Inc — 100% of income from government
- The Key Program Incorporated — 86% of income from government
- Pathways for Childreninc — 86% of income from government
- The Edinburg Center Inc — 81% of income from government
- Roca Inc — 78% of income from government
- The Mass Mentoring Partnership Inc — 63% of income from government
- Partakers Inc — 59% of income from government
- Health Law Advocates Inc — 52% of income from government
- Justice Resource Institute Inc — 48% of income from government
- Utec Inc — 46% of income from government
- Mothers for Justice and Equality Inc — 43% of income from government
- New Beginnings Reentry Services Inc — 42% of income from government
- Robert F Kennedy Community Alliance Inc — 41% of income from government
- The Performance Project Inc — 40% of income from government
- On the Rise Inc — 39% of income from government
- Missionsafe a New Beginning Inc — 38% of income from government
- Children's Services of Roxbury Inc — 35% of income from government
- Community Resources for Justice Inc — 34% of income from government
- Louis D Brown Peace Institute Corp — 32% of income from government
- Council of Juvenile Justice Administrators Inc — 30% of income from government
- The Petey Greene Program Inc — 29% of income from government
- Behavioral Health Network Inc — 28% of income from government
- Straight Ahead Ministries Inc — 27% of income from government
- More Than Words Inc — 24% of income from government
- Community Teamwork Inc — 23% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Fathers Uplift Incorporated — 22% of income from government
- Strategies for Youth — 21% of income from government
- Essex County Community Organization — 15% of income from government
- Doc Wayne Inc — 15% of income from government
- New England Innocence Project — 12% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Youthbuild Boston Inc — 9% of income from government
- Communities for Restorative Justice Inc — 8% of income from government
- One Can Help Inc — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Community Legal Aid Inc — 5% of income from government
- Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute of Technology — 5% of income from government
- Children's Trust Inc — 3% of income from government
- Greater Boston Legal Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Clark University — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- Transformative Culture Project Inc F/K/a Press Pass Tv Inc — 2% of income from government
- Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Amazing Grace of Cape Cod Inc — 1% of income from government
- Youth Advocacy Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wayside Youth and Family Support Network Inc — 1% of income from government
- Madison Park Development Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
- Springfield Boys & Girls Club Inc — 1% of income from government
- Worcester Common Ground Inc — 1% of income from government
- Merrimack College — 1% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
- Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gardiner Howland Shaw Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Gardiner Howland Shaw Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.