· Private foundation
Maskateer Charitable Corporation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k1 grant · $1k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $10,000 |
| EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FU | $10,000 |
| PKD FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ZCARES FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| YOGA BHARTI | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- PFPKD Foundation6× · 2017–2022 · $55k · revenue +90%
- FSFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC5× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +45%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- GSGRAM SEVA FOUNDATION USAone grant, 2021 · $27k · revenue -38%
- TTEAM4TECHone grant, 2020 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.
Improve excellence and access in higher education. Current focus is on India. Thus, Nalanda 2.0's current focus is to make India's higher education system world-class by building a world-class multidisciplinary research university,…
The foundation is dedicated to finding a cure for parkinson's disease through an aggressively funded research agenda and ensuring the development of improved therapies for those living with parkinson's today.
Khyentse foundation is a nonprofit organization incorporated in the state of washington, usa, in november, 2001. founded by dzongsar khyentse rinpoche, the foundation aims to preserve and share the buddha's wisdom with everyone. primarily…
Nanban foundation strives to provide free, high-quality financial education for all. the organization functions with the support of volunteers united by one common goal: knowledge sharing. embracing online education, we invite people of…
Public education
Transforming lives of underprivileged children through education, technology, healthcare programs, and connection with a global network of qualified volunteers and mentors.
How this is measured
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PKD Foundation ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds GRAM SEVA FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Z-CARES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Yoga Bharati ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KQED INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Maskateer Charitable Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maskateer Charitable Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Maskateer Charitable Corporation?
Find your warmest path to Maskateer Charitable Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Maskateer’s filings →